Kai-Lun Hu, Jie Zhao, Mingmei Lin, Xiaoye Wang, Linjing Qi, Huan Liu, Dan Mo, Zhonghong Zeng, Ben W Mol, Rong Li
{"title":"在真空吸引术基础上增加宫腔镜手术治疗试管受精后早期妊娠失败。","authors":"Kai-Lun Hu, Jie Zhao, Mingmei Lin, Xiaoye Wang, Linjing Qi, Huan Liu, Dan Mo, Zhonghong Zeng, Ben W Mol, Rong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether operative hysteroscopy in addition to vacuum aspiration for the management of early pregnancy loss effectively increases the success rate of subsequent frozen embryo transfer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Propensity score-matched cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic hospital.</p><p><strong>Patient(s): </strong>Women with a miscarriage at 5-16 gestational weeks during an in vitro fertilization cycle in Peking University Third Hospital from 2015 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>Hysteroscopy plus vacuum aspiration vs. conventional vacuum aspiration.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Live birth rate in the subsequent frozen embryo transfer.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>A total of 347 women who underwent vacuum aspiration plus hysteroscopy and 2,562 women who underwent conventional vacuum aspiration were included in the analysis. After propensity score matching (1:1 ratio), 325 women were included in each group. Compared with women who underwent vacuum aspiration, those who underwent vacuum aspiration plus hysteroscopy were associated with a lower rate of live birth in the propensity score-based matched cohort (22% vs. 30%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.68 [0.47-0.97]). Biochemical, clinical, and multiple pregnancy rates were not significantly different, as was the miscarriage rate. In the overall cohort, 11 women experienced surgery reintervention in the vacuum aspiration group (0.4%), whereas none required surgery reintervention in the vacuum aspiration plus hysteroscopy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Women who underwent vacuum aspiration plus hysteroscopy may be associated with lower rates of live birth than those who underwent vacuum aspiration. Further studies are necessary to establish this relationship definitively.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":"1134-1143"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of operative hysteroscopy to vacuum aspiration for the management of early pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization.\",\"authors\":\"Kai-Lun Hu, Jie Zhao, Mingmei Lin, Xiaoye Wang, Linjing Qi, Huan Liu, Dan Mo, Zhonghong Zeng, Ben W Mol, Rong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether operative hysteroscopy in addition to vacuum aspiration for the management of early pregnancy loss effectively increases the success rate of subsequent frozen embryo transfer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Propensity score-matched cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic hospital.</p><p><strong>Patient(s): </strong>Women with a miscarriage at 5-16 gestational weeks during an in vitro fertilization cycle in Peking University Third Hospital from 2015 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>Hysteroscopy plus vacuum aspiration vs. conventional vacuum aspiration.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Live birth rate in the subsequent frozen embryo transfer.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>A total of 347 women who underwent vacuum aspiration plus hysteroscopy and 2,562 women who underwent conventional vacuum aspiration were included in the analysis. After propensity score matching (1:1 ratio), 325 women were included in each group. Compared with women who underwent vacuum aspiration, those who underwent vacuum aspiration plus hysteroscopy were associated with a lower rate of live birth in the propensity score-based matched cohort (22% vs. 30%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.68 [0.47-0.97]). Biochemical, clinical, and multiple pregnancy rates were not significantly different, as was the miscarriage rate. In the overall cohort, 11 women experienced surgery reintervention in the vacuum aspiration group (0.4%), whereas none required surgery reintervention in the vacuum aspiration plus hysteroscopy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Women who underwent vacuum aspiration plus hysteroscopy may be associated with lower rates of live birth than those who underwent vacuum aspiration. Further studies are necessary to establish this relationship definitively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1134-1143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.027\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的研究在治疗早期妊娠失败时,除真空吸引术外,宫腔镜手术是否能有效提高后续冷冻胚胎移植的成功率:倾向得分匹配队列研究:暴露:宫腔镜加真空吸引术与常规真空吸引术对比。主要结局指标:结果:347名接受真空吸引术加宫腔镜检查的妇女和2562名接受传统真空吸引术的妇女被纳入分析。经过倾向评分匹配(1:1 比例)后,每组各纳入 325 名妇女。与接受真空吸引术的妇女相比,在倾向性匹配队列中,接受真空吸引术加宫腔镜检查的妇女的活产率较低(22% vs 30%,aOR = 0.68 (0.47, 0.97))。生化妊娠率、临床妊娠率和多胎妊娠率以及流产率没有显著差异。在整个队列中,真空吸引组有11名妇女(0.4%)经历过手术再干预,而真空吸引加宫腔镜检查组没有人需要手术再干预:结论:与接受真空吸引术的妇女相比,接受真空吸引术加宫腔镜检查的妇女的活产率可能较低。要确定这种关系,还需要进一步的研究。
Addition of operative hysteroscopy to vacuum aspiration for the management of early pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization.
Objective: To investigate whether operative hysteroscopy in addition to vacuum aspiration for the management of early pregnancy loss effectively increases the success rate of subsequent frozen embryo transfer.
Design: Propensity score-matched cohort study.
Setting: Academic hospital.
Patient(s): Women with a miscarriage at 5-16 gestational weeks during an in vitro fertilization cycle in Peking University Third Hospital from 2015 to 2022.
Intervention(s): Hysteroscopy plus vacuum aspiration vs. conventional vacuum aspiration.
Main outcome measure(s): Live birth rate in the subsequent frozen embryo transfer.
Result(s): A total of 347 women who underwent vacuum aspiration plus hysteroscopy and 2,562 women who underwent conventional vacuum aspiration were included in the analysis. After propensity score matching (1:1 ratio), 325 women were included in each group. Compared with women who underwent vacuum aspiration, those who underwent vacuum aspiration plus hysteroscopy were associated with a lower rate of live birth in the propensity score-based matched cohort (22% vs. 30%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.68 [0.47-0.97]). Biochemical, clinical, and multiple pregnancy rates were not significantly different, as was the miscarriage rate. In the overall cohort, 11 women experienced surgery reintervention in the vacuum aspiration group (0.4%), whereas none required surgery reintervention in the vacuum aspiration plus hysteroscopy group.
Conclusion(s): Women who underwent vacuum aspiration plus hysteroscopy may be associated with lower rates of live birth than those who underwent vacuum aspiration. Further studies are necessary to establish this relationship definitively.
期刊介绍:
Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.