孤立、歧视和 "持续内疚 "感:以混合方法分析女医生在生育、计划生育和肿瘤事业方面的经历。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Pub Date : 2024-07-28 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35456
Sarah Marion MD, Shraddha M. Dalwadi MD, MBA, Aleksandra Kuczmarska-Haas MD, Erin F. Gillespie MD, Michelle S. Ludwig MD, PhD, Emma B. Holliday MD, Bridgette Thom PhD, Fumiko Chino MD, Anna Lee MD, MPH
{"title":"孤立、歧视和 \"持续内疚 \"感:以混合方法分析女医生在生育、计划生育和肿瘤事业方面的经历。","authors":"Sarah Marion MD,&nbsp;Shraddha M. Dalwadi MD, MBA,&nbsp;Aleksandra Kuczmarska-Haas MD,&nbsp;Erin F. Gillespie MD,&nbsp;Michelle S. Ludwig MD, PhD,&nbsp;Emma B. Holliday MD,&nbsp;Bridgette Thom PhD,&nbsp;Fumiko Chino MD,&nbsp;Anna Lee MD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Family planning among female physicians is harmed by high risks of infertility, workload burden, poor family leave policies, and gender discrimination. Many women report feeling unsupported in the workplace, despite national policies to protect against unfair treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This secondary analysis applied a modified version of the rigorous and accelerated data reduction technique to conduct a thematic analysis of comments to an open-ended prompt. Comments were coded by multiple trained researchers then grouped and merged into illustrative themes via qualitative techniques.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 1004 responses to the quantitative survey, 162 physicians completed the open-ended prompt. Initial codes (<i>n</i> = 16) were combined into eight groups including, from which three overarching themes were identified. Institutional barriers were highlighted with comments discussing the increased need for parental leave, part-time options and the concern for academic or professional punishment for being pregnant and/or having children. Departmental barriers were explored with comments grouped around codes of discrimination/negative culture and challenges with breastfeeding/pumping and childcare. Personal barriers were discussed in themes highlighting the difficulties that female physicians faced around the timing of family planning, challenges with reproductive health and assistance, and alternative circumstances and/or decisions against family planning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Barriers to family planning in oncology exist across career domains from dysfunctional maternity leave to poor education on infertility risk. Solutions include improving institutional support, expanding parental leave, and general cultural change to improve awareness and promotion of family and career balance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"130 22","pages":"3855-3862"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolation, discrimination, and feeling “constant guilt”: A mixed-methods analysis of female physicians’ experience with fertility, family planning, and oncology careers\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Marion MD,&nbsp;Shraddha M. Dalwadi MD, MBA,&nbsp;Aleksandra Kuczmarska-Haas MD,&nbsp;Erin F. Gillespie MD,&nbsp;Michelle S. Ludwig MD, PhD,&nbsp;Emma B. Holliday MD,&nbsp;Bridgette Thom PhD,&nbsp;Fumiko Chino MD,&nbsp;Anna Lee MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cncr.35456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Family planning among female physicians is harmed by high risks of infertility, workload burden, poor family leave policies, and gender discrimination. Many women report feeling unsupported in the workplace, despite national policies to protect against unfair treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This secondary analysis applied a modified version of the rigorous and accelerated data reduction technique to conduct a thematic analysis of comments to an open-ended prompt. Comments were coded by multiple trained researchers then grouped and merged into illustrative themes via qualitative techniques.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 1004 responses to the quantitative survey, 162 physicians completed the open-ended prompt. Initial codes (<i>n</i> = 16) were combined into eight groups including, from which three overarching themes were identified. Institutional barriers were highlighted with comments discussing the increased need for parental leave, part-time options and the concern for academic or professional punishment for being pregnant and/or having children. Departmental barriers were explored with comments grouped around codes of discrimination/negative culture and challenges with breastfeeding/pumping and childcare. Personal barriers were discussed in themes highlighting the difficulties that female physicians faced around the timing of family planning, challenges with reproductive health and assistance, and alternative circumstances and/or decisions against family planning.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Barriers to family planning in oncology exist across career domains from dysfunctional maternity leave to poor education on infertility risk. Solutions include improving institutional support, expanding parental leave, and general cultural change to improve awareness and promotion of family and career balance.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer\",\"volume\":\"130 22\",\"pages\":\"3855-3862\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35456\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于不孕风险高、工作量大、家事假政策不完善以及性别歧视,女医生的计划生育受到了损害。尽管国家出台了保护妇女免受不公平待遇的政策,但许多妇女仍表示在工作场所得不到支持:这项二次分析采用了修改版的严格和加速数据缩减技术,对开放式提示的评论进行了专题分析。评论由多名训练有素的研究人员进行编码,然后通过定性技术进行分组并合并成说明性主题:在定量调查的 1004 份回复中,有 162 名医生完成了开放式提示。最初的代码(n = 16)被合并为八组,其中包括三个总体主题。机构障碍突出表现在对育儿假需求增加、非全日制选择以及担心怀孕和/或有孩子会受到学术或职业惩罚等方面的评论。在探讨部门障碍时,围绕歧视/负面文化、母乳喂养/助产和儿童保育方面的挑战等问题进行了评论。个人障碍的讨论主题突出了女医生在计划生育的时间安排、生殖健康和援助方面的挑战以及其他情况和/或反对计划生育的决定等方面所面临的困难:结论:肿瘤学领域的计划生育障碍存在于各个职业领域,从功能失调的产假到不孕不育风险教育不足。解决方法包括改善机构支持、扩大育儿假,以及普遍的文化变革,以提高对家庭与事业平衡的认识和促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Isolation, discrimination, and feeling “constant guilt”: A mixed-methods analysis of female physicians’ experience with fertility, family planning, and oncology careers

Introduction

Family planning among female physicians is harmed by high risks of infertility, workload burden, poor family leave policies, and gender discrimination. Many women report feeling unsupported in the workplace, despite national policies to protect against unfair treatment.

Methods

This secondary analysis applied a modified version of the rigorous and accelerated data reduction technique to conduct a thematic analysis of comments to an open-ended prompt. Comments were coded by multiple trained researchers then grouped and merged into illustrative themes via qualitative techniques.

Results

Of 1004 responses to the quantitative survey, 162 physicians completed the open-ended prompt. Initial codes (n = 16) were combined into eight groups including, from which three overarching themes were identified. Institutional barriers were highlighted with comments discussing the increased need for parental leave, part-time options and the concern for academic or professional punishment for being pregnant and/or having children. Departmental barriers were explored with comments grouped around codes of discrimination/negative culture and challenges with breastfeeding/pumping and childcare. Personal barriers were discussed in themes highlighting the difficulties that female physicians faced around the timing of family planning, challenges with reproductive health and assistance, and alternative circumstances and/or decisions against family planning.

Conclusion

Barriers to family planning in oncology exist across career domains from dysfunctional maternity leave to poor education on infertility risk. Solutions include improving institutional support, expanding parental leave, and general cultural change to improve awareness and promotion of family and career balance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信