{"title":"揭示两种豌豆(Pisum sativum L.)栽培品种在模拟酸雨诱导的氧化胁迫下的生化、生理和生长响应的内在机制","authors":"Jigyasa Prakash, Shashi Bhushan Agrawal, Madhoolika Agrawal","doi":"10.1007/s12298-024-01494-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current experiment was designed to evaluate the ramifications of simulated acid rain (SAR) on two pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.) cultivars, Kashi Samridhi (Samridhi) and Kashi Nandini (Nandini), to decipher the intraspecific variations in defence mechanism considering the current scenario of rapid anthropogenic activities leading to increase in rain acidity. The pea cultivars were subjected to SAR of pH 7 (Control), 5.6, 5.0, and 4.5 under field conditions. SAR increased active oxygen species and malondialdehyde content due to increased lipid peroxidation in both cultivars; however, the increment intensity was more remarkable in Samridhi at the later growth stage. Ascorbic acid, thiol, and flavonoids were significantly increased in cultivar Nandini, along with increased peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities. Total phenolics, glutathione reductase, and ascorbate peroxidase activities were enhanced considerably in Samridhi than in Nandini under SAR treatments. Higher stomatal density and stomatal size in Samridhi prompted greater acidic particles influx which further damaged the chloroplast and mitochondria. The present study concludes that cultivar Nandini is more proficient in inducing defence responses by elevating non-enzymatic antioxidants than Samridhi. Non-enzymatic linked defence mechanisms are more metabolically expensive, leading to less biomass accumulation in Nandini. The study depicted that innate defence responses, particularly the role of non-enzymatic antioxidants, governed the sensitivity level of cultivars towards SAR stress. Further, findings also contribute to bridging the knowledge gap regarding the responses of tropical and subtropical crops to acid rain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20148,"journal":{"name":"Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unraveling the underlying mechanisms of biochemical, physiological, and growth responses of two pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars under simulated acid rain-induced oxidative stress\",\"authors\":\"Jigyasa Prakash, Shashi Bhushan Agrawal, Madhoolika Agrawal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12298-024-01494-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The current experiment was designed to evaluate the ramifications of simulated acid rain (SAR) on two pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.) cultivars, Kashi Samridhi (Samridhi) and Kashi Nandini (Nandini), to decipher the intraspecific variations in defence mechanism considering the current scenario of rapid anthropogenic activities leading to increase in rain acidity. The pea cultivars were subjected to SAR of pH 7 (Control), 5.6, 5.0, and 4.5 under field conditions. SAR increased active oxygen species and malondialdehyde content due to increased lipid peroxidation in both cultivars; however, the increment intensity was more remarkable in Samridhi at the later growth stage. Ascorbic acid, thiol, and flavonoids were significantly increased in cultivar Nandini, along with increased peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities. Total phenolics, glutathione reductase, and ascorbate peroxidase activities were enhanced considerably in Samridhi than in Nandini under SAR treatments. Higher stomatal density and stomatal size in Samridhi prompted greater acidic particles influx which further damaged the chloroplast and mitochondria. The present study concludes that cultivar Nandini is more proficient in inducing defence responses by elevating non-enzymatic antioxidants than Samridhi. Non-enzymatic linked defence mechanisms are more metabolically expensive, leading to less biomass accumulation in Nandini. The study depicted that innate defence responses, particularly the role of non-enzymatic antioxidants, governed the sensitivity level of cultivars towards SAR stress. Further, findings also contribute to bridging the knowledge gap regarding the responses of tropical and subtropical crops to acid rain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-024-01494-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-024-01494-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目前的实验旨在评估模拟酸雨(SAR)对两个豌豆(Pisum sativum L.)栽培品种--Kashi Samridhi(Samridhi)和 Kashi Nandini(Nandini)--的影响,以了解在当前人类活动迅速导致雨水酸度增加的情况下,防御机制的种内差异。在田间条件下,豌豆栽培品种分别受到 pH 值为 7(对照)、5.6、5.0 和 4.5 的 SAR 的影响。由于两种栽培品种的脂质过氧化反应加剧,SAR 增加了活性氧和丙二醛的含量;但是,Samridhi 在后期生长阶段的活性氧和丙二醛含量增加更为显著。Nandini 品种的抗坏血酸、硫醇和类黄酮含量显著增加,过氧化物酶和超氧化物歧化酶活性也有所提高。在 SAR 处理下,Samridhi 的总酚、谷胱甘肽还原酶和抗坏血酸过氧化物酶活性比 Nandini 高得多。Samridhi 的气孔密度和气孔大小较高,促使酸性颗粒流入,进一步损害了叶绿体和线粒体。本研究得出结论,与 Samridhi 相比,Nandini 栽培品种更善于通过提高非酶性抗氧化剂来诱导防御反应。非酶联防御机制的代谢成本较高,导致 Nandini 的生物量积累较少。研究表明,先天防御反应,特别是非酶抗氧化剂的作用,决定了栽培品种对 SAR 胁迫的敏感程度。此外,研究结果还有助于缩小热带和亚热带作物对酸雨反应的知识差距。
Unraveling the underlying mechanisms of biochemical, physiological, and growth responses of two pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars under simulated acid rain-induced oxidative stress
The current experiment was designed to evaluate the ramifications of simulated acid rain (SAR) on two pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars, Kashi Samridhi (Samridhi) and Kashi Nandini (Nandini), to decipher the intraspecific variations in defence mechanism considering the current scenario of rapid anthropogenic activities leading to increase in rain acidity. The pea cultivars were subjected to SAR of pH 7 (Control), 5.6, 5.0, and 4.5 under field conditions. SAR increased active oxygen species and malondialdehyde content due to increased lipid peroxidation in both cultivars; however, the increment intensity was more remarkable in Samridhi at the later growth stage. Ascorbic acid, thiol, and flavonoids were significantly increased in cultivar Nandini, along with increased peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities. Total phenolics, glutathione reductase, and ascorbate peroxidase activities were enhanced considerably in Samridhi than in Nandini under SAR treatments. Higher stomatal density and stomatal size in Samridhi prompted greater acidic particles influx which further damaged the chloroplast and mitochondria. The present study concludes that cultivar Nandini is more proficient in inducing defence responses by elevating non-enzymatic antioxidants than Samridhi. Non-enzymatic linked defence mechanisms are more metabolically expensive, leading to less biomass accumulation in Nandini. The study depicted that innate defence responses, particularly the role of non-enzymatic antioxidants, governed the sensitivity level of cultivars towards SAR stress. Further, findings also contribute to bridging the knowledge gap regarding the responses of tropical and subtropical crops to acid rain.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1995, Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants (PMBP) is a peer reviewed monthly journal co-published by Springer Nature. It contains research and review articles, short communications, commentaries, book reviews etc., in all areas of functional plant biology including, but not limited to plant physiology, biochemistry, molecular genetics, molecular pathology, biophysics, cell and molecular biology, genetics, genomics and bioinformatics. Its integrated and interdisciplinary approach reflects the global growth trajectories in functional plant biology, attracting authors/editors/reviewers from over 98 countries.