均衡器基于机器学习的高能效异构集群负载平衡器

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Taha Abdelazziz Rahmani, Ghalem Belalem, Sidi Ahmed Mahmoudi, Omar Rafik Merad-Boudia
{"title":"均衡器基于机器学习的高能效异构集群负载平衡器","authors":"Taha Abdelazziz Rahmani,&nbsp;Ghalem Belalem,&nbsp;Sidi Ahmed Mahmoudi,&nbsp;Omar Rafik Merad-Boudia","doi":"10.1002/cpe.8230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Heterogeneous systems deliver high computing performance when effectively utilized. It is crucial to execute each application on the most suitable device while maintaining system balance. However, achieving equal distribution of the computing load is challenging due to variations in computing power and device architectures within the system. Moreover, scheduling applications at real-time further complicates this task, as prior information about the submitted applications is absent. In this context, we introduce “Equalizer,” a real-time load balancer for heterogeneous systems. “Equalizer” leverages machine learning to continuously monitor the system's state, predicting optimal devices for application execution at runtime. It assigns applications to devices that minimize system imbalance. To quantify system imbalance, we propose a novel metric that reflects the disparity in computing loads across the system's devices. This metric is calculated using predicted execution times of applications. To validate the performance of “Equalizer,” we conducted a comparative study against widely adopted approaches, namely Round Robin and Device Suitability. The experiments were performed on a heterogeneous cluster comprising a master host and three slave servers, equipped with a total of 4 central processing units (CPUs) and 4 graphics processing units (GPUs). All approaches were deployed on the cluster and evaluated using three distinct workloads categorized by their computing intensity: medium intensity, heavy intensity, and a combination of heavy and medium intensity, simulating real-world scenarios. Each workload consisted of a set of 80 OpenCL applications with varying input data sizes. The experimental results demonstrate that “Equalizer” effectively minimized the system's imbalance, reduced the idle time of devices, and eliminated overloads. Moreover, “Equalizer” exhibited significant improvements in workload execution time, resource utilization, throughput, and energy consumption. Across all tested scenarios, “Equalizer” consistently outperformed alternative approaches, showcasing its robustness, adaptability to dynamic environments, and applicability in real-world practice.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55214,"journal":{"name":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","volume":"36 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equalizer: Energy-efficient machine learning-based heterogeneous cluster load balancer\",\"authors\":\"Taha Abdelazziz Rahmani,&nbsp;Ghalem Belalem,&nbsp;Sidi Ahmed Mahmoudi,&nbsp;Omar Rafik Merad-Boudia\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpe.8230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Heterogeneous systems deliver high computing performance when effectively utilized. It is crucial to execute each application on the most suitable device while maintaining system balance. However, achieving equal distribution of the computing load is challenging due to variations in computing power and device architectures within the system. Moreover, scheduling applications at real-time further complicates this task, as prior information about the submitted applications is absent. In this context, we introduce “Equalizer,” a real-time load balancer for heterogeneous systems. “Equalizer” leverages machine learning to continuously monitor the system's state, predicting optimal devices for application execution at runtime. It assigns applications to devices that minimize system imbalance. To quantify system imbalance, we propose a novel metric that reflects the disparity in computing loads across the system's devices. This metric is calculated using predicted execution times of applications. To validate the performance of “Equalizer,” we conducted a comparative study against widely adopted approaches, namely Round Robin and Device Suitability. The experiments were performed on a heterogeneous cluster comprising a master host and three slave servers, equipped with a total of 4 central processing units (CPUs) and 4 graphics processing units (GPUs). All approaches were deployed on the cluster and evaluated using three distinct workloads categorized by their computing intensity: medium intensity, heavy intensity, and a combination of heavy and medium intensity, simulating real-world scenarios. Each workload consisted of a set of 80 OpenCL applications with varying input data sizes. The experimental results demonstrate that “Equalizer” effectively minimized the system's imbalance, reduced the idle time of devices, and eliminated overloads. Moreover, “Equalizer” exhibited significant improvements in workload execution time, resource utilization, throughput, and energy consumption. Across all tested scenarios, “Equalizer” consistently outperformed alternative approaches, showcasing its robustness, adaptability to dynamic environments, and applicability in real-world practice.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience\",\"volume\":\"36 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.8230\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.8230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要异构系统如能得到有效利用,可提供极高的计算性能。在保持系统平衡的同时,在最合适的设备上执行每个应用程序至关重要。然而,由于系统内计算能力和设备架构的差异,实现计算负载的平均分配具有挑战性。此外,由于缺乏有关已提交应用程序的事先信息,实时调度应用程序使这项任务更加复杂。在这种情况下,我们引入了 "Equalizer"--一种用于异构系统的实时负载平衡器。"Equalizer "利用机器学习持续监控系统状态,预测运行时执行应用的最佳设备。它将应用程序分配到设备上,最大限度地减少系统失衡。为了量化系统失衡,我们提出了一种新的指标,它能反映系统各设备之间计算负载的差异。该指标使用应用程序的预测执行时间来计算。为了验证 "均衡器 "的性能,我们进行了一项与广泛采用的方法(即 Round Robin 和 Device Suitability)的比较研究。实验在一个异构集群上进行,该集群由一台主主机和三台从属服务器组成,共配备 4 个中央处理器(CPU)和 4 个图形处理器(GPU)。所有方法都部署在集群上,并使用按计算强度分类的三种不同工作负载进行评估:中等强度、高强度以及高强度和中等强度的组合,模拟真实世界的场景。每个工作负载由一组输入数据大小不同的 80 个 OpenCL 应用程序组成。实验结果表明,"Equalizer "有效地减少了系统的不平衡,缩短了设备的空闲时间,并消除了过载现象。此外,"Equalizer "在工作负载执行时间、资源利用率、吞吐量和能耗方面都有显著改善。在所有测试场景中,"Equalizer "的性能始终优于其他方法,这充分证明了它的鲁棒性、对动态环境的适应性以及在实际应用中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equalizer: Energy-efficient machine learning-based heterogeneous cluster load balancer

Heterogeneous systems deliver high computing performance when effectively utilized. It is crucial to execute each application on the most suitable device while maintaining system balance. However, achieving equal distribution of the computing load is challenging due to variations in computing power and device architectures within the system. Moreover, scheduling applications at real-time further complicates this task, as prior information about the submitted applications is absent. In this context, we introduce “Equalizer,” a real-time load balancer for heterogeneous systems. “Equalizer” leverages machine learning to continuously monitor the system's state, predicting optimal devices for application execution at runtime. It assigns applications to devices that minimize system imbalance. To quantify system imbalance, we propose a novel metric that reflects the disparity in computing loads across the system's devices. This metric is calculated using predicted execution times of applications. To validate the performance of “Equalizer,” we conducted a comparative study against widely adopted approaches, namely Round Robin and Device Suitability. The experiments were performed on a heterogeneous cluster comprising a master host and three slave servers, equipped with a total of 4 central processing units (CPUs) and 4 graphics processing units (GPUs). All approaches were deployed on the cluster and evaluated using three distinct workloads categorized by their computing intensity: medium intensity, heavy intensity, and a combination of heavy and medium intensity, simulating real-world scenarios. Each workload consisted of a set of 80 OpenCL applications with varying input data sizes. The experimental results demonstrate that “Equalizer” effectively minimized the system's imbalance, reduced the idle time of devices, and eliminated overloads. Moreover, “Equalizer” exhibited significant improvements in workload execution time, resource utilization, throughput, and energy consumption. Across all tested scenarios, “Equalizer” consistently outperformed alternative approaches, showcasing its robustness, adaptability to dynamic environments, and applicability in real-world practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
664
审稿时长
9.6 months
期刊介绍: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE) publishes high-quality, original research papers, and authoritative research review papers, in the overlapping fields of: Parallel and distributed computing; High-performance computing; Computational and data science; Artificial intelligence and machine learning; Big data applications, algorithms, and systems; Network science; Ontologies and semantics; Security and privacy; Cloud/edge/fog computing; Green computing; and Quantum computing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信