在一个为期 20 年的恢复项目中,通过播种和种植重新引入 Armeria maritima ssp:对遗传变异有影响吗?

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Katerina Iberl, Christoph Reisch
{"title":"在一个为期 20 年的恢复项目中,通过播种和种植重新引入 Armeria maritima ssp:对遗传变异有影响吗?","authors":"Katerina Iberl,&nbsp;Christoph Reisch","doi":"10.1016/j.flora.2024.152570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reintroduction is a frequently used method to restore populations of endangered species. However, it has hardly been tested whether there is a pronounced genetic impact resulting from different propagule types used for restoration. To address this knowledge gap, we carried out a pilot study based on a 20-years practical experiment, in which new populations of the rare and endangered herb <em>Armeria maritima</em> ssp. <em>elongata</em> were founded using seeds and/or young plants. The experiment took place in a nature reserve protecting a declining nutrient-poor sand-dune habitat. To evaluate if there was an effect of propagule type on genetic variation of restored populations, we compared populations of <em>A. maritima</em> ssp. <em>elongata</em> started by direct seeding, planting of seedlings and both seeding &amp; planting<em>.</em> Using molecular markers (AFLPs), we observed slightly higher levels of genetic diversity within restored compared to the source population. Genetic diversity was comparable in populations restored by different propagules, and genetic differentiation between the source and restored populations was absent. Our study provides a first piece of evidence that both seeds and young plants can be applied successfully in population restoration projects. We suggest to further test the impact of the reintroduction methods on restoration outcomes under different experimental settings, e.g. using species with different life history traits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reintroduction of Armeria maritima ssp. elongata by sowing and planting in a 20-year restoration project: Is there an impact on genetic variation?\",\"authors\":\"Katerina Iberl,&nbsp;Christoph Reisch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.flora.2024.152570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Reintroduction is a frequently used method to restore populations of endangered species. However, it has hardly been tested whether there is a pronounced genetic impact resulting from different propagule types used for restoration. To address this knowledge gap, we carried out a pilot study based on a 20-years practical experiment, in which new populations of the rare and endangered herb <em>Armeria maritima</em> ssp. <em>elongata</em> were founded using seeds and/or young plants. The experiment took place in a nature reserve protecting a declining nutrient-poor sand-dune habitat. To evaluate if there was an effect of propagule type on genetic variation of restored populations, we compared populations of <em>A. maritima</em> ssp. <em>elongata</em> started by direct seeding, planting of seedlings and both seeding &amp; planting<em>.</em> Using molecular markers (AFLPs), we observed slightly higher levels of genetic diversity within restored compared to the source population. Genetic diversity was comparable in populations restored by different propagules, and genetic differentiation between the source and restored populations was absent. Our study provides a first piece of evidence that both seeds and young plants can be applied successfully in population restoration projects. We suggest to further test the impact of the reintroduction methods on restoration outcomes under different experimental settings, e.g. using species with different life history traits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0367253024001221\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0367253024001221","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重新引入是恢复濒危物种种群的常用方法。然而,几乎没有人测试过用于恢复的不同繁殖类型是否会产生明显的遗传影响。为了填补这一知识空白,我们在一项长达 20 年的实际实验基础上开展了一项试点研究,利用种子和/或幼苗建立珍稀濒危草本植物的新种群。实验在一个自然保护区内进行,该保护区保护着一个营养贫瘠的沙丘栖息地。为了评估繁殖类型是否会对恢复种群的遗传变异产生影响,我们比较了通过直接播种、种植幼苗以及播种和种植两种方式建立的草本植物种群。 通过分子标记(AFLPs),我们观察到恢复种群的遗传多样性水平略高于原种群。在通过不同繁殖方式恢复的种群中,遗传多样性不相上下,而且原种群和恢复种群之间不存在遗传分化。我们的研究为种子和幼苗都能成功应用于种群恢复项目提供了第一个证据。我们建议在不同的实验环境下,如使用具有不同生活史特征的物种,进一步测试重新引入方法对恢复结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reintroduction of Armeria maritima ssp. elongata by sowing and planting in a 20-year restoration project: Is there an impact on genetic variation?

Reintroduction is a frequently used method to restore populations of endangered species. However, it has hardly been tested whether there is a pronounced genetic impact resulting from different propagule types used for restoration. To address this knowledge gap, we carried out a pilot study based on a 20-years practical experiment, in which new populations of the rare and endangered herb Armeria maritima ssp. elongata were founded using seeds and/or young plants. The experiment took place in a nature reserve protecting a declining nutrient-poor sand-dune habitat. To evaluate if there was an effect of propagule type on genetic variation of restored populations, we compared populations of A. maritima ssp. elongata started by direct seeding, planting of seedlings and both seeding & planting. Using molecular markers (AFLPs), we observed slightly higher levels of genetic diversity within restored compared to the source population. Genetic diversity was comparable in populations restored by different propagules, and genetic differentiation between the source and restored populations was absent. Our study provides a first piece of evidence that both seeds and young plants can be applied successfully in population restoration projects. We suggest to further test the impact of the reintroduction methods on restoration outcomes under different experimental settings, e.g. using species with different life history traits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信