长度偏差数据下巴克利-詹姆斯估计器的经验似然推断

IF 1.4 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Narjes Amiri, Vahid Fakoor, Majid Sarmad, Mahboubeh Akbari
{"title":"长度偏差数据下巴克利-詹姆斯估计器的经验似然推断","authors":"Narjes Amiri,&nbsp;Vahid Fakoor,&nbsp;Majid Sarmad,&nbsp;Mahboubeh Akbari","doi":"10.1007/s40995-024-01668-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A problem that statisticians frequently face is the analysis of survival data obtained from a non-random sampling procedure. When each subject can be selected with a chance proportional to its measure, the bias imposed on the sample is called length bias. This paper uses empirical likelihood to construct confidence intervals for the regression coefficients using a Buckley–James type estimator when the underlying sample is length-biased. For this purpose, the empirical log-likelihood ratio is derived, and its asymptotic distribution is shown to be a standard chi-square. A simulation study is carried out to compare the confidence intervals based on the empirical likelihood and those based on the normal approximation. Following this, it is revealed that the empirical likelihood method improves the performance of the confidence intervals, specifically for small sample sizes. Finally, the methods are illustrated by modeling the regression parameter and estimating confidence intervals for a set of real data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":600,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science","volume":"48 5","pages":"1329 - 1339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical Likelihood Inference of the Buckley–James Estimator with Length-Biased Data\",\"authors\":\"Narjes Amiri,&nbsp;Vahid Fakoor,&nbsp;Majid Sarmad,&nbsp;Mahboubeh Akbari\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40995-024-01668-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A problem that statisticians frequently face is the analysis of survival data obtained from a non-random sampling procedure. When each subject can be selected with a chance proportional to its measure, the bias imposed on the sample is called length bias. This paper uses empirical likelihood to construct confidence intervals for the regression coefficients using a Buckley–James type estimator when the underlying sample is length-biased. For this purpose, the empirical log-likelihood ratio is derived, and its asymptotic distribution is shown to be a standard chi-square. A simulation study is carried out to compare the confidence intervals based on the empirical likelihood and those based on the normal approximation. Following this, it is revealed that the empirical likelihood method improves the performance of the confidence intervals, specifically for small sample sizes. Finally, the methods are illustrated by modeling the regression parameter and estimating confidence intervals for a set of real data.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science\",\"volume\":\"48 5\",\"pages\":\"1329 - 1339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"4\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40995-024-01668-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40995-024-01668-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

统计学家经常面临的一个问题是如何分析通过非随机抽样程序获得的生存数据。当每个受试者被选中的几率与其测量值成正比时,施加在样本上的偏差称为长度偏差。本文利用经验似然法,在基础样本存在长度偏差的情况下,使用巴克利-詹姆斯类型估计器构建回归系数的置信区间。为此,推导出了经验对数似然比,并证明其渐近分布是标准的卡方分布。通过模拟研究,比较了基于经验似然法的置信区间和基于正态近似法的置信区间。结果表明,经验似然法提高了置信区间的性能,尤其是在样本量较小的情况下。最后,通过为一组真实数据建立回归参数模型和估计置信区间来说明这些方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Empirical Likelihood Inference of the Buckley–James Estimator with Length-Biased Data

Empirical Likelihood Inference of the Buckley–James Estimator with Length-Biased Data

A problem that statisticians frequently face is the analysis of survival data obtained from a non-random sampling procedure. When each subject can be selected with a chance proportional to its measure, the bias imposed on the sample is called length bias. This paper uses empirical likelihood to construct confidence intervals for the regression coefficients using a Buckley–James type estimator when the underlying sample is length-biased. For this purpose, the empirical log-likelihood ratio is derived, and its asymptotic distribution is shown to be a standard chi-square. A simulation study is carried out to compare the confidence intervals based on the empirical likelihood and those based on the normal approximation. Following this, it is revealed that the empirical likelihood method improves the performance of the confidence intervals, specifically for small sample sizes. Finally, the methods are illustrated by modeling the regression parameter and estimating confidence intervals for a set of real data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to foster the growth of scientific research among Iranian scientists and to provide a medium which brings the fruits of their research to the attention of the world’s scientific community. The journal publishes original research findings – which may be theoretical, experimental or both - reviews, techniques, and comments spanning all subjects in the field of basic sciences, including Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Statistics, Biology and Earth Sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信