青少年校本幸福感普查:葡萄牙学生主观幸福感问卷的验证

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Rosário Serrão, Pedro Dias, Ana Andrés, Mhairi Bowe, Tyler Renshaw
{"title":"青少年校本幸福感普查:葡萄牙学生主观幸福感问卷的验证","authors":"Rosário Serrão, Pedro Dias, Ana Andrés, Mhairi Bowe, Tyler Renshaw","doi":"10.1007/s12310-024-09691-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>School-based universal well-being screening is proposed within the Multi-tiered Systems of Support approach to collect data on school and individual well-being. Universal screening allows for data-based informed decision, allocating each pupil or set of pupils in universal, selective and/or indicated structured interventions and supports. However, schools require adequate and validated measures of both positive well-being and indicators of psychological health problems. This study focused on the adaptation and validation of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire (SSWQ) in Portugal, a tool directed to positive well-being screening. After a translation process, data was collected in 10 schools. A sample of 942 school pupils in the 3rd cycle was randomly split into two subsamples. First was conducted on one subsample, and then, CFA was conducted in the other. Gender and school year invariance were also conducted with the CFA subsample. Internal consistency was likewise analysed. The analysis finished with convergent and discriminant validity. Overall, results supported a second-order factor model (subjective well-being), including four first-order factors, with the elimination of one item and changing one item to another subscale. Results showed good reliability of each factor (all above 0.70). Full measurement invariance was reached for gender (male and female) and school year (7th, 8th and 9th grades). Convergent validity was found with measures of satisfaction with school, group identification with peers and school social support, and divergent validity was found with BPM-Y. Altogether, results support that SSWQ-PG can be used to screen for subjective well-being in schools, helping schools in identifying and addressing pupils’ mental health needs more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":51538,"journal":{"name":"School Mental Health","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adolescents’ School-Based Universal Well-Being Screening: A Validation of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire in Portugal\",\"authors\":\"Rosário Serrão, Pedro Dias, Ana Andrés, Mhairi Bowe, Tyler Renshaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12310-024-09691-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>School-based universal well-being screening is proposed within the Multi-tiered Systems of Support approach to collect data on school and individual well-being. Universal screening allows for data-based informed decision, allocating each pupil or set of pupils in universal, selective and/or indicated structured interventions and supports. However, schools require adequate and validated measures of both positive well-being and indicators of psychological health problems. This study focused on the adaptation and validation of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire (SSWQ) in Portugal, a tool directed to positive well-being screening. After a translation process, data was collected in 10 schools. A sample of 942 school pupils in the 3rd cycle was randomly split into two subsamples. First was conducted on one subsample, and then, CFA was conducted in the other. Gender and school year invariance were also conducted with the CFA subsample. Internal consistency was likewise analysed. The analysis finished with convergent and discriminant validity. Overall, results supported a second-order factor model (subjective well-being), including four first-order factors, with the elimination of one item and changing one item to another subscale. Results showed good reliability of each factor (all above 0.70). Full measurement invariance was reached for gender (male and female) and school year (7th, 8th and 9th grades). Convergent validity was found with measures of satisfaction with school, group identification with peers and school social support, and divergent validity was found with BPM-Y. Altogether, results support that SSWQ-PG can be used to screen for subjective well-being in schools, helping schools in identifying and addressing pupils’ mental health needs more effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09691-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09691-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在多层次支持系统方法中提出了以学校为基础的普遍幸福筛查,以收集有关学校和个人幸福的数据。通过普遍筛查,可以根据数据做出明智的决定,将每个学生或每组学生分配到普遍、选择性和/或有针对性的结构化干预和支持中。然而,学校需要对积极的幸福感和心理健康问题指标进行充分和有效的测量。本研究的重点是在葡萄牙对学生主观幸福感问卷(SSWQ)进行改编和验证,这是一种针对积极幸福感筛查的工具。经过翻译,在 10 所学校收集了数据。942 名第三阶段的小学生被随机分成两个子样本。首先对其中一个子样本进行分析,然后对另一个子样本进行 CFA 分析。还对 CFA 子样本进行了性别和学年不变性分析。同样还分析了内部一致性。最后进行了收敛效度和判别效度分析。总体而言,结果支持二阶因子模型(主观幸福感),包括四个一阶因子,但删除了一个项目,并将一个项目改为另一个子量表。结果显示,每个因子都具有良好的可靠性(均高于 0.70)。性别(男性和女性)和学年(七年级、八年级和九年级)达到了完全测量不变量。与 "对学校的满意度"、"对同伴的群体认同感 "和 "学校社会支持 "的测量结果具有聚合效度,而与 "BPM-Y "的测量结果具有发散效度。总之,研究结果表明,SSWQ-PG 可用于筛查学校中学生的主观幸福感,帮助学校更有效地识别和解决学生的心理健康需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Adolescents’ School-Based Universal Well-Being Screening: A Validation of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire in Portugal

Adolescents’ School-Based Universal Well-Being Screening: A Validation of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire in Portugal

School-based universal well-being screening is proposed within the Multi-tiered Systems of Support approach to collect data on school and individual well-being. Universal screening allows for data-based informed decision, allocating each pupil or set of pupils in universal, selective and/or indicated structured interventions and supports. However, schools require adequate and validated measures of both positive well-being and indicators of psychological health problems. This study focused on the adaptation and validation of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire (SSWQ) in Portugal, a tool directed to positive well-being screening. After a translation process, data was collected in 10 schools. A sample of 942 school pupils in the 3rd cycle was randomly split into two subsamples. First was conducted on one subsample, and then, CFA was conducted in the other. Gender and school year invariance were also conducted with the CFA subsample. Internal consistency was likewise analysed. The analysis finished with convergent and discriminant validity. Overall, results supported a second-order factor model (subjective well-being), including four first-order factors, with the elimination of one item and changing one item to another subscale. Results showed good reliability of each factor (all above 0.70). Full measurement invariance was reached for gender (male and female) and school year (7th, 8th and 9th grades). Convergent validity was found with measures of satisfaction with school, group identification with peers and school social support, and divergent validity was found with BPM-Y. Altogether, results support that SSWQ-PG can be used to screen for subjective well-being in schools, helping schools in identifying and addressing pupils’ mental health needs more effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: School Mental Health: A Multidisciplinary Research and Practice Journal is a forum for the latest research related to prevention, treatment, and assessment practices that are associated with the pre-K to 12th-grade education system and focuses on children and adolescents with emotional and behavioral disorders. The journal publishes empirical studies, quantitative and qualitative research, and systematic and scoping review articles from authors representing the many disciplines that are involved in school mental health, including child and school psychology, education, pediatrics, child and adolescent psychiatry, developmental psychology, school counseling, social work and nursing.  Sample topics include: ·         Innovative school-based treatment practices·         Consultation and professional development procedures·         Dissemination and implementation science targeting schools·         Educational techniques for children with emotional and behavioral disorders·         Schoolwide prevention programs·         Medication effects on school behavior and achievement·         Assessment practices·         Special education services·         Developmental implications affecting learning and behavior·         Racial, ethnic, and cultural issues·         School policy·         Role of families in school mental health·         Prediction of impairment and resilience·         Moderators and mediators of response to treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信