{"title":"利用离子束中的主动和被动探测器评估 LET 的现状","authors":"Jeppe Brage Christensen , Iván Domingo Muñoz , Pawel Bilski , Valeria Conte , Pawel Olko , Lily Bossin , Anne Vestergaard , Stefano Agosteo , Anatoly Rosenfeld , Linh Tran , Željka Knežević , Marija Majer , Iva Ambrožová , Alessio Parisi , Tim Gehrke , Mária Martišíková , Niels Bassler","doi":"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review explores current experimental methods for determining the radiation quality in ion beams. In this context, radiation quality is commonly evaluated using the averaged linear energy transfer (LET), a metric employed to assess the response of both biological and physical systems. Dose and averaged LET can be experimentally determined with passive detectors through various techniques that have seen recent improvements. Another metric related to the LET is the mean lineal energy, which is measurable using microdosimetric detectors. This review focuses on the available possibilities for evaluating the radiation quality using three microdosimeters (mini-TEPC, Silicon Telescope, and SOI Microplus), three passive luminescence detectors (based on optical, thermo-, and radiophoto-luminescence), three track-based detectors (track-etched detector, Timepix, fluorescent nuclear track detector), and a chemical detector based on alanine. A comparison of detector properties is provided along with an overview of the underlying mechanisms enabling LET assessment or measurements of the mean lineal energy with each detector type. Finally, this review summarizes the current possibilities of LET determination with respect to the needs for quality assurance in particle therapy. Areas for future research and development are suggested.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21055,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Measurements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724002002/pdfft?md5=67f187f3091f05046397a48805e97fd4&pid=1-s2.0-S1350448724002002-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Status of LET assessment with active and passive detectors in ion beams\",\"authors\":\"Jeppe Brage Christensen , Iván Domingo Muñoz , Pawel Bilski , Valeria Conte , Pawel Olko , Lily Bossin , Anne Vestergaard , Stefano Agosteo , Anatoly Rosenfeld , Linh Tran , Željka Knežević , Marija Majer , Iva Ambrožová , Alessio Parisi , Tim Gehrke , Mária Martišíková , Niels Bassler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This review explores current experimental methods for determining the radiation quality in ion beams. In this context, radiation quality is commonly evaluated using the averaged linear energy transfer (LET), a metric employed to assess the response of both biological and physical systems. Dose and averaged LET can be experimentally determined with passive detectors through various techniques that have seen recent improvements. Another metric related to the LET is the mean lineal energy, which is measurable using microdosimetric detectors. This review focuses on the available possibilities for evaluating the radiation quality using three microdosimeters (mini-TEPC, Silicon Telescope, and SOI Microplus), three passive luminescence detectors (based on optical, thermo-, and radiophoto-luminescence), three track-based detectors (track-etched detector, Timepix, fluorescent nuclear track detector), and a chemical detector based on alanine. A comparison of detector properties is provided along with an overview of the underlying mechanisms enabling LET assessment or measurements of the mean lineal energy with each detector type. Finally, this review summarizes the current possibilities of LET determination with respect to the needs for quality assurance in particle therapy. Areas for future research and development are suggested.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Measurements\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724002002/pdfft?md5=67f187f3091f05046397a48805e97fd4&pid=1-s2.0-S1350448724002002-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Measurements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724002002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724002002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本综述探讨了目前确定离子束辐射质量的实验方法。在这种情况下,通常使用平均线性能量传递(LET)来评估辐射质量,这是一种用于评估生物和物理系统响应的指标。剂量和平均线性能量转移可以通过最近改进的各种技术,用被动探测器进行实验测定。与 LET 有关的另一个指标是平均线能量,可使用微量探测器进行测量。本综述重点介绍了使用三种微型探测器(微型 TEPC、硅望远镜和 SOI Microplus)、三种被动发光探测器(基于光学、热学和放射光发光)、三种轨道探测器(轨道蚀刻、Timepix、荧光核轨道探测器)和一种基于丙氨酸的化学探测器评估辐射质量的可能性。本综述对探测器的特性进行了比较,并概述了每种探测器进行 LET 评估或测量平均线能量的基本机制。最后,本综述总结了目前根据粒子治疗质量保证需求进行 LET 测定的可能性,并提出了未来研究和开发的领域。
Status of LET assessment with active and passive detectors in ion beams
This review explores current experimental methods for determining the radiation quality in ion beams. In this context, radiation quality is commonly evaluated using the averaged linear energy transfer (LET), a metric employed to assess the response of both biological and physical systems. Dose and averaged LET can be experimentally determined with passive detectors through various techniques that have seen recent improvements. Another metric related to the LET is the mean lineal energy, which is measurable using microdosimetric detectors. This review focuses on the available possibilities for evaluating the radiation quality using three microdosimeters (mini-TEPC, Silicon Telescope, and SOI Microplus), three passive luminescence detectors (based on optical, thermo-, and radiophoto-luminescence), three track-based detectors (track-etched detector, Timepix, fluorescent nuclear track detector), and a chemical detector based on alanine. A comparison of detector properties is provided along with an overview of the underlying mechanisms enabling LET assessment or measurements of the mean lineal energy with each detector type. Finally, this review summarizes the current possibilities of LET determination with respect to the needs for quality assurance in particle therapy. Areas for future research and development are suggested.
期刊介绍:
The journal seeks to publish papers that present advances in the following areas: spontaneous and stimulated luminescence (including scintillating materials, thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence); electron spin resonance of natural and synthetic materials; the physics, design and performance of radiation measurements (including computational modelling such as electronic transport simulations); the novel basic aspects of radiation measurement in medical physics. Studies of energy-transfer phenomena, track physics and microdosimetry are also of interest to the journal.
Applications relevant to the journal, particularly where they present novel detection techniques, novel analytical approaches or novel materials, include: personal dosimetry (including dosimetric quantities, active/electronic and passive monitoring techniques for photon, neutron and charged-particle exposures); environmental dosimetry (including methodological advances and predictive models related to radon, but generally excluding local survey results of radon where the main aim is to establish the radiation risk to populations); cosmic and high-energy radiation measurements (including dosimetry, space radiation effects, and single event upsets); dosimetry-based archaeological and Quaternary dating; dosimetry-based approaches to thermochronometry; accident and retrospective dosimetry (including activation detectors), and dosimetry and measurements related to medical applications.