{"title":"基于分馏次数的选择性复杂分馏心房电图消融术治疗肺静脉隔离术难治的持续性心房颤动","authors":"Masahiro Mizobuchi, Tomoki Yamashita, Tatsushi Sato, Atsushi Funatsu, Tomoko Kobayashi, Shigeru Nakamura","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01889-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Previous studies have suggested that the prolonged or highly fractionated electrograms during atrial fibrillation (AF) are closely related to the reentrant driver regions. We hypothesized that exploration and ablation of these critical complex atrial fractionated electrograms (CFAE) may improve the outcome of persistent AF (PeAF) refractory to conventional PVI.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A total of 73 PeAF patients with residual inducibility or failed cardioversions of AF after PVI were enrolled and underwent number-of-fractionation mapping (NFM) by counting the number of fractionations in 2.5 s at each of the points using the CARTO3 (ICL mode) and EnSite (fractionation map) systems. After NFM, selective CFAE ablation (NFM-CA) targeting the sites of the upper 40% of the counted fraction number (NF40) was performed as an additional procedure for refractory PeAF. We investigated the prognosis of these patients within 24 months after the index ablation procedure and the relationship between changes in activation patterns during the ablation procedure and their prognosis. We also performed a propensity score–matched analysis comparing these patients with historical controls (HC) to identify the optimal indications for NFM-CA.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The AF/AT free survival rate was 79.1% at 12 months and 56.7% at 24 months. Patients with AF termination or AF cycle length prolongation > 21 ms during the procedure had significantly better AF/AT-free survival rates than those without notable activation changes (87.7% vs. 69.0%, logrank <i>p</i> = 0.028). After propensity-matched analysis, AF/AT-free survival showed comparable results between the two groups (1 year; NFM 72.1% vs. HC 77.1%, logrank <i>p</i> = 0.649).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>NFM-CA is a versatile and less invasive adjunctive procedure for patients with PVI-refractory PeAF who showed a comparable prognosis to patients with PVI-compliant PeAF. In particular, remarkable activation changes during the procedure (AFCL prolongation > 21 ms or acute termination) suggest a favorable prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation based on the number-of-fractionation for persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to pulmonary vein isolation\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Mizobuchi, Tomoki Yamashita, Tatsushi Sato, Atsushi Funatsu, Tomoko Kobayashi, Shigeru Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-024-01889-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Introduction</h3><p>Previous studies have suggested that the prolonged or highly fractionated electrograms during atrial fibrillation (AF) are closely related to the reentrant driver regions. We hypothesized that exploration and ablation of these critical complex atrial fractionated electrograms (CFAE) may improve the outcome of persistent AF (PeAF) refractory to conventional PVI.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>A total of 73 PeAF patients with residual inducibility or failed cardioversions of AF after PVI were enrolled and underwent number-of-fractionation mapping (NFM) by counting the number of fractionations in 2.5 s at each of the points using the CARTO3 (ICL mode) and EnSite (fractionation map) systems. After NFM, selective CFAE ablation (NFM-CA) targeting the sites of the upper 40% of the counted fraction number (NF40) was performed as an additional procedure for refractory PeAF. We investigated the prognosis of these patients within 24 months after the index ablation procedure and the relationship between changes in activation patterns during the ablation procedure and their prognosis. We also performed a propensity score–matched analysis comparing these patients with historical controls (HC) to identify the optimal indications for NFM-CA.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The AF/AT free survival rate was 79.1% at 12 months and 56.7% at 24 months. Patients with AF termination or AF cycle length prolongation > 21 ms during the procedure had significantly better AF/AT-free survival rates than those without notable activation changes (87.7% vs. 69.0%, logrank <i>p</i> = 0.028). After propensity-matched analysis, AF/AT-free survival showed comparable results between the two groups (1 year; NFM 72.1% vs. HC 77.1%, logrank <i>p</i> = 0.649).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>NFM-CA is a versatile and less invasive adjunctive procedure for patients with PVI-refractory PeAF who showed a comparable prognosis to patients with PVI-compliant PeAF. In particular, remarkable activation changes during the procedure (AFCL prolongation > 21 ms or acute termination) suggest a favorable prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01889-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01889-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Selective complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation based on the number-of-fractionation for persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to pulmonary vein isolation
Introduction
Previous studies have suggested that the prolonged or highly fractionated electrograms during atrial fibrillation (AF) are closely related to the reentrant driver regions. We hypothesized that exploration and ablation of these critical complex atrial fractionated electrograms (CFAE) may improve the outcome of persistent AF (PeAF) refractory to conventional PVI.
Methods
A total of 73 PeAF patients with residual inducibility or failed cardioversions of AF after PVI were enrolled and underwent number-of-fractionation mapping (NFM) by counting the number of fractionations in 2.5 s at each of the points using the CARTO3 (ICL mode) and EnSite (fractionation map) systems. After NFM, selective CFAE ablation (NFM-CA) targeting the sites of the upper 40% of the counted fraction number (NF40) was performed as an additional procedure for refractory PeAF. We investigated the prognosis of these patients within 24 months after the index ablation procedure and the relationship between changes in activation patterns during the ablation procedure and their prognosis. We also performed a propensity score–matched analysis comparing these patients with historical controls (HC) to identify the optimal indications for NFM-CA.
Results
The AF/AT free survival rate was 79.1% at 12 months and 56.7% at 24 months. Patients with AF termination or AF cycle length prolongation > 21 ms during the procedure had significantly better AF/AT-free survival rates than those without notable activation changes (87.7% vs. 69.0%, logrank p = 0.028). After propensity-matched analysis, AF/AT-free survival showed comparable results between the two groups (1 year; NFM 72.1% vs. HC 77.1%, logrank p = 0.649).
Conclusions
NFM-CA is a versatile and less invasive adjunctive procedure for patients with PVI-refractory PeAF who showed a comparable prognosis to patients with PVI-compliant PeAF. In particular, remarkable activation changes during the procedure (AFCL prolongation > 21 ms or acute termination) suggest a favorable prognosis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.