移动医疗干预对服务使用者健康结果的影响以及医疗专业的作用：系统性审查的系统性审查--协议

IF 6.3 4区医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02624-y

Fathiya Alkhuzaimi, Deborah Rainey, Christine Brown Wilson, Jacqueline Bloomfield

{"title":"移动医疗干预对服务使用者健康结果的影响以及医疗专业的作用：系统性审查的系统性审查--协议","authors":"Fathiya Alkhuzaimi, Deborah Rainey, Christine Brown Wilson, Jacqueline Bloomfield","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02624-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile health tools have gained prominence in global health care in recent years. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have demonstrated their impact on managing healthcare service users’ health. A pilot search revealed many systematic reviews on the effectiveness of mobile health tools on service users’ health outcomes. However, how the role of healthcare professionals in promoting the adoption of mobile health may lead to improved outcomes needs to be clarified. Therefore, this systematic review aims to synthesise existing systematic reviews that examine both the impact of mobile health interventions on service users’ outcomes and the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating the adoption of mobile health solutions. Five electronic databases will be searched: EMBASE, CINHAL Plus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews exploring the impact of mobile health interventions on service users’ outcomes and the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating the adoption of mobile health solutions. Systematic reviews published in English dated from January 2015 to June 2024 will be included. Screening and selection of the reviews against inclusion and exclusion criteria will be performed by three independent reviewers, as well as data extraction and quality assessment. Current systematic reviews in mHealth have primarily focused on assessing the effectiveness of mHealth interventions for managing a range of conditions. While these reviews provide valuable input into the outcomes for mHealth, more is needed to know about the impact of the involvement of health professions on service users’ outcomes when adopting mHealth. This systematic review of systematic reviews aims to bridge this critical gap in the literature by critically appraising and synthesising the evidence of mHealth interventions’ impact on service user outcomes and the level of involvement of health professionals. PROSPERO CRD 42023414435.","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"53 10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of mobile health interventions on service users’ health outcomes and the role of health professions: a systematic review of systematic reviews—protocol\",\"authors\":\"Fathiya Alkhuzaimi, Deborah Rainey, Christine Brown Wilson, Jacqueline Bloomfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-024-02624-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mobile health tools have gained prominence in global health care in recent years. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have demonstrated their impact on managing healthcare service users’ health. A pilot search revealed many systematic reviews on the effectiveness of mobile health tools on service users’ health outcomes. However, how the role of healthcare professionals in promoting the adoption of mobile health may lead to improved outcomes needs to be clarified. Therefore, this systematic review aims to synthesise existing systematic reviews that examine both the impact of mobile health interventions on service users’ outcomes and the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating the adoption of mobile health solutions. Five electronic databases will be searched: EMBASE, CINHAL Plus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews exploring the impact of mobile health interventions on service users’ outcomes and the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating the adoption of mobile health solutions. Systematic reviews published in English dated from January 2015 to June 2024 will be included. Screening and selection of the reviews against inclusion and exclusion criteria will be performed by three independent reviewers, as well as data extraction and quality assessment. Current systematic reviews in mHealth have primarily focused on assessing the effectiveness of mHealth interventions for managing a range of conditions. While these reviews provide valuable input into the outcomes for mHealth, more is needed to know about the impact of the involvement of health professions on service users’ outcomes when adopting mHealth. This systematic review of systematic reviews aims to bridge this critical gap in the literature by critically appraising and synthesising the evidence of mHealth interventions’ impact on service user outcomes and the level of involvement of health professionals. PROSPERO CRD 42023414435.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"53 10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02624-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02624-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来，移动医疗工具在全球医疗保健领域日益突出。移动医疗（mHealth）干预措施已证明其对医疗服务用户健康管理的影响。通过试验性搜索，我们发现了许多关于移动医疗工具对服务用户健康结果的有效性的系统性综述。然而，医疗保健专业人员在促进采用移动医疗方面所扮演的角色如何能够带来更好的结果尚需明确。因此，本系统性综述旨在综合现有的系统性综述，这些综述既研究了移动医疗干预措施对服务使用者健康结果的影响，也研究了医疗保健专业人员在促进采用移动医疗解决方案中的作用。我们将检索五个电子数据库：EMBASE、CINHAL Plus、MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆，以查找探讨移动医疗干预对服务用户的疗效影响以及医疗保健专业人员在促进移动医疗解决方案应用中的作用的系统性综述。将收录 2015 年 1 月至 2024 年 6 月期间以英文发表的系统性综述。三位独立审稿人将根据纳入和排除标准对综述进行筛选，并进行数据提取和质量评估。目前移动医疗领域的系统性综述主要侧重于评估移动医疗干预措施在管理一系列疾病方面的有效性。虽然这些综述为移动医疗的成果提供了宝贵的意见，但我们还需要进一步了解在采用移动医疗时，卫生专业人员的参与对服务用户成果的影响。本系统性综述旨在通过批判性评估和综合移动医疗干预对服务用户结果的影响以及医疗专业人员参与程度的证据，弥补文献中的这一重要空白。PERCORCO CRD 42023414435。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The impact of mobile health interventions on service users’ health outcomes and the role of health professions: a systematic review of systematic reviews—protocol

Mobile health tools have gained prominence in global health care in recent years. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have demonstrated their impact on managing healthcare service users’ health. A pilot search revealed many systematic reviews on the effectiveness of mobile health tools on service users’ health outcomes. However, how the role of healthcare professionals in promoting the adoption of mobile health may lead to improved outcomes needs to be clarified. Therefore, this systematic review aims to synthesise existing systematic reviews that examine both the impact of mobile health interventions on service users’ outcomes and the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating the adoption of mobile health solutions. Five electronic databases will be searched: EMBASE, CINHAL Plus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews exploring the impact of mobile health interventions on service users’ outcomes and the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating the adoption of mobile health solutions. Systematic reviews published in English dated from January 2015 to June 2024 will be included. Screening and selection of the reviews against inclusion and exclusion criteria will be performed by three independent reviewers, as well as data extraction and quality assessment. Current systematic reviews in mHealth have primarily focused on assessing the effectiveness of mHealth interventions for managing a range of conditions. While these reviews provide valuable input into the outcomes for mHealth, more is needed to know about the impact of the involvement of health professions on service users’ outcomes when adopting mHealth. This systematic review of systematic reviews aims to bridge this critical gap in the literature by critically appraising and synthesising the evidence of mHealth interventions’ impact on service user outcomes and the level of involvement of health professionals. PROSPERO CRD 42023414435.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

8.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

241

审稿时长

11 weeks

期刊介绍： Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.