学生如何使用 ChatGPT 作为写作辅助工具?

IF 0.9 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sarah Levine, Sarah W. Beck, Chris Mah, Lena Phalen, Jaylen PIttman
{"title":"学生如何使用 ChatGPT 作为写作辅助工具?","authors":"Sarah Levine, Sarah W. Beck, Chris Mah, Lena Phalen, Jaylen PIttman","doi":"10.1002/jaal.1373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educators and researchers are interested in ways that ChatGPT and other generative AI tools might move beyond the role of “cheatbot” and become part of the network of resources students use for writing. We studied how high school students used ChatGPT as a writing support while writing arguments about topics like school mascots. We asked: What did students prompt ChatGPT to do? And how did students take up ChatGPT's responses to those prompts? We used Flower and Hayes' writing model to analyze screencasts of students interacting with ChatGPT and one another as they planned, drafted, and reviewed their arguments. Our data show that while planning and drafting, students primarily asked ChatGPT for ideas and then built upon those ideas to develop their own arguments. While reviewing, they generally used ChatGPT as they might use Grammarly or other editing tools. Students also compared their writing with that of ChatGPT, which allowed them to identify their unique writing voices and build meta‐level understandings of rhetorical choices and effects. Our study indicates that ChatGPT can become a part of a social, distributed model of writing, and that students can use ChatGPT as a resource for writing without sidestepping the processes of planning, drafting, and reviewing.","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do students use ChatGPT as a writing support?\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Levine, Sarah W. Beck, Chris Mah, Lena Phalen, Jaylen PIttman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jaal.1373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Educators and researchers are interested in ways that ChatGPT and other generative AI tools might move beyond the role of “cheatbot” and become part of the network of resources students use for writing. We studied how high school students used ChatGPT as a writing support while writing arguments about topics like school mascots. We asked: What did students prompt ChatGPT to do? And how did students take up ChatGPT's responses to those prompts? We used Flower and Hayes' writing model to analyze screencasts of students interacting with ChatGPT and one another as they planned, drafted, and reviewed their arguments. Our data show that while planning and drafting, students primarily asked ChatGPT for ideas and then built upon those ideas to develop their own arguments. While reviewing, they generally used ChatGPT as they might use Grammarly or other editing tools. Students also compared their writing with that of ChatGPT, which allowed them to identify their unique writing voices and build meta‐level understandings of rhetorical choices and effects. Our study indicates that ChatGPT can become a part of a social, distributed model of writing, and that students can use ChatGPT as a resource for writing without sidestepping the processes of planning, drafting, and reviewing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1373\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育工作者和研究人员对 ChatGPT 和其他生成式人工智能工具如何超越 "作弊机器人 "的角色,成为学生写作资源网络的一部分很感兴趣。我们研究了高中生在撰写关于学校吉祥物等主题的论据时如何使用 ChatGPT 作为写作辅助工具。我们问学生促使 ChatGPT 做了什么?学生又是如何使用 ChatGPT 回应这些提示的?我们使用 Flower 和 Hayes 的写作模型,分析了学生在计划、起草和审阅论点时与 ChatGPT 以及学生之间互动的截屏。我们的数据显示,在计划和起草过程中,学生主要是向 ChatGPT 征求想法,然后在这些想法的基础上形成自己的论点。在审阅时,他们一般会像使用 Grammarly 或其他编辑工具一样使用 ChatGPT。学生们还会将自己的写作与 ChatGPT 的写作进行比较,从而发现自己独特的写作声音,并建立对修辞选择和效果的元层面理解。我们的研究表明,ChatGPT 可以成为社会化、分布式写作模式的一部分,学生可以使用 ChatGPT 作为写作资源,而无需回避计划、起草和审阅的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do students use ChatGPT as a writing support?
Educators and researchers are interested in ways that ChatGPT and other generative AI tools might move beyond the role of “cheatbot” and become part of the network of resources students use for writing. We studied how high school students used ChatGPT as a writing support while writing arguments about topics like school mascots. We asked: What did students prompt ChatGPT to do? And how did students take up ChatGPT's responses to those prompts? We used Flower and Hayes' writing model to analyze screencasts of students interacting with ChatGPT and one another as they planned, drafted, and reviewed their arguments. Our data show that while planning and drafting, students primarily asked ChatGPT for ideas and then built upon those ideas to develop their own arguments. While reviewing, they generally used ChatGPT as they might use Grammarly or other editing tools. Students also compared their writing with that of ChatGPT, which allowed them to identify their unique writing voices and build meta‐level understandings of rhetorical choices and effects. Our study indicates that ChatGPT can become a part of a social, distributed model of writing, and that students can use ChatGPT as a resource for writing without sidestepping the processes of planning, drafting, and reviewing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy is the only literacy journal published exclusively for teachers of older learners. Each issue offers practical, classroom-tested ideas grounded in research and theory. Whether you work with new, struggling, or skilled readers, you’ll find something of interest in JAAL. Every issue includes •Practical ideas for instruction •Reviews of student and teacher resources, including young adult literature •Tips on how to integrate technology, media, and popular culture in your classroom •Reflections on current literacy trends, issues, and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信