{"title":"资源抵押贷款与人类发展的生态效率:非洲国家的证据","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main challenge for most African countries is to find an alternative source of funding that can meet the needs of present generation without jeopardizing the needs of the future generations. Indeed, budgetary pressures are as defaults and economic recessions, combined with difficulties in accessing financial markets, which are often triggered by a series of sovereign debt restructurings and defaults, and have led some resource-rich African countries to turn to resource-backed loans to finance infrastructure projects to achieve long-term sustainable development goals. In this paper, we use the entropy balancing method to test whether resource-backed loans have a causal impact on the ecological efficiency of human development of African economies. Across a battery of robustness checks, the estimation results indicate that resource-backed loans have a positive and statistically significant impact on ecological efficiency of human development. Nonetheless, when resource-backed loans are disaggregated to run the regressions, we find that oil-backed loans and minerals resource-backed loans increase ecological efficiency of human development while cocoa and tobacco resource-backed loans are negatively associated to ecological efficiency of human development. The main findings of the study suggest that resource-backed loans agreements in general, and cocoa and tobacco in particular, should include strict clean development provisions and the implementation of actions to mitigate the negative environmental impact of these loans for borrowing countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924001927/pdfft?md5=26dc0f187a13f4ce4e631ff67ba6d1da&pid=1-s2.0-S0921800924001927-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resource-backed loans and ecological efficiency of human development: Evidence from African countries\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The main challenge for most African countries is to find an alternative source of funding that can meet the needs of present generation without jeopardizing the needs of the future generations. Indeed, budgetary pressures are as defaults and economic recessions, combined with difficulties in accessing financial markets, which are often triggered by a series of sovereign debt restructurings and defaults, and have led some resource-rich African countries to turn to resource-backed loans to finance infrastructure projects to achieve long-term sustainable development goals. In this paper, we use the entropy balancing method to test whether resource-backed loans have a causal impact on the ecological efficiency of human development of African economies. Across a battery of robustness checks, the estimation results indicate that resource-backed loans have a positive and statistically significant impact on ecological efficiency of human development. Nonetheless, when resource-backed loans are disaggregated to run the regressions, we find that oil-backed loans and minerals resource-backed loans increase ecological efficiency of human development while cocoa and tobacco resource-backed loans are negatively associated to ecological efficiency of human development. The main findings of the study suggest that resource-backed loans agreements in general, and cocoa and tobacco in particular, should include strict clean development provisions and the implementation of actions to mitigate the negative environmental impact of these loans for borrowing countries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924001927/pdfft?md5=26dc0f187a13f4ce4e631ff67ba6d1da&pid=1-s2.0-S0921800924001927-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924001927\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924001927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Resource-backed loans and ecological efficiency of human development: Evidence from African countries
The main challenge for most African countries is to find an alternative source of funding that can meet the needs of present generation without jeopardizing the needs of the future generations. Indeed, budgetary pressures are as defaults and economic recessions, combined with difficulties in accessing financial markets, which are often triggered by a series of sovereign debt restructurings and defaults, and have led some resource-rich African countries to turn to resource-backed loans to finance infrastructure projects to achieve long-term sustainable development goals. In this paper, we use the entropy balancing method to test whether resource-backed loans have a causal impact on the ecological efficiency of human development of African economies. Across a battery of robustness checks, the estimation results indicate that resource-backed loans have a positive and statistically significant impact on ecological efficiency of human development. Nonetheless, when resource-backed loans are disaggregated to run the regressions, we find that oil-backed loans and minerals resource-backed loans increase ecological efficiency of human development while cocoa and tobacco resource-backed loans are negatively associated to ecological efficiency of human development. The main findings of the study suggest that resource-backed loans agreements in general, and cocoa and tobacco in particular, should include strict clean development provisions and the implementation of actions to mitigate the negative environmental impact of these loans for borrowing countries.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.