资源抵押贷款与人类发展的生态效率:非洲国家的证据

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY
{"title":"资源抵押贷款与人类发展的生态效率:非洲国家的证据","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main challenge for most African countries is to find an alternative source of funding that can meet the needs of present generation without jeopardizing the needs of the future generations. Indeed, budgetary pressures are as defaults and economic recessions, combined with difficulties in accessing financial markets, which are often triggered by a series of sovereign debt restructurings and defaults, and have led some resource-rich African countries to turn to resource-backed loans to finance infrastructure projects to achieve long-term sustainable development goals. In this paper, we use the entropy balancing method to test whether resource-backed loans have a causal impact on the ecological efficiency of human development of African economies. Across a battery of robustness checks, the estimation results indicate that resource-backed loans have a positive and statistically significant impact on ecological efficiency of human development. Nonetheless, when resource-backed loans are disaggregated to run the regressions, we find that oil-backed loans and minerals resource-backed loans increase ecological efficiency of human development while cocoa and tobacco resource-backed loans are negatively associated to ecological efficiency of human development. The main findings of the study suggest that resource-backed loans agreements in general, and cocoa and tobacco in particular, should include strict clean development provisions and the implementation of actions to mitigate the negative environmental impact of these loans for borrowing countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924001927/pdfft?md5=26dc0f187a13f4ce4e631ff67ba6d1da&pid=1-s2.0-S0921800924001927-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resource-backed loans and ecological efficiency of human development: Evidence from African countries\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The main challenge for most African countries is to find an alternative source of funding that can meet the needs of present generation without jeopardizing the needs of the future generations. Indeed, budgetary pressures are as defaults and economic recessions, combined with difficulties in accessing financial markets, which are often triggered by a series of sovereign debt restructurings and defaults, and have led some resource-rich African countries to turn to resource-backed loans to finance infrastructure projects to achieve long-term sustainable development goals. In this paper, we use the entropy balancing method to test whether resource-backed loans have a causal impact on the ecological efficiency of human development of African economies. Across a battery of robustness checks, the estimation results indicate that resource-backed loans have a positive and statistically significant impact on ecological efficiency of human development. Nonetheless, when resource-backed loans are disaggregated to run the regressions, we find that oil-backed loans and minerals resource-backed loans increase ecological efficiency of human development while cocoa and tobacco resource-backed loans are negatively associated to ecological efficiency of human development. The main findings of the study suggest that resource-backed loans agreements in general, and cocoa and tobacco in particular, should include strict clean development provisions and the implementation of actions to mitigate the negative environmental impact of these loans for borrowing countries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924001927/pdfft?md5=26dc0f187a13f4ce4e631ff67ba6d1da&pid=1-s2.0-S0921800924001927-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924001927\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924001927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数非洲国家面临的主要挑战是找到一种替代资金来源,既能满足当代人的需 求,又不危及子孙后代的需要。事实上,由于违约和经济衰退造成的预算压力,再加上进入金融市场的困难(往往由一系列主权债务重组和违约引发),导致一些资源丰富的非洲国家转而利用资源支持贷款为基础设施项目融资,以实现长期可持续发展目标。在本文中,我们使用熵平衡法来检验资源支持贷款是否对非洲经济体人类发展的生态效率产生因果影响。通过一系列稳健性检验,估计结果表明,资源支持贷款对人类发展的生态效率有积极的、统计上显著的影响。然而,当对资源支持贷款进行分类回归时,我们发现石油支持贷款和矿产资源支持贷款会提高人类发展的生态效率,而可可和烟草资源支持贷款则与人类发展的生态效率负相关。研究的主要结果表明,一般来说,资源支持贷款协议,尤其是可可和烟草协议,应包括严格的清洁发展条款,并采取行动减轻这些贷款对借款国环境的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resource-backed loans and ecological efficiency of human development: Evidence from African countries

The main challenge for most African countries is to find an alternative source of funding that can meet the needs of present generation without jeopardizing the needs of the future generations. Indeed, budgetary pressures are as defaults and economic recessions, combined with difficulties in accessing financial markets, which are often triggered by a series of sovereign debt restructurings and defaults, and have led some resource-rich African countries to turn to resource-backed loans to finance infrastructure projects to achieve long-term sustainable development goals. In this paper, we use the entropy balancing method to test whether resource-backed loans have a causal impact on the ecological efficiency of human development of African economies. Across a battery of robustness checks, the estimation results indicate that resource-backed loans have a positive and statistically significant impact on ecological efficiency of human development. Nonetheless, when resource-backed loans are disaggregated to run the regressions, we find that oil-backed loans and minerals resource-backed loans increase ecological efficiency of human development while cocoa and tobacco resource-backed loans are negatively associated to ecological efficiency of human development. The main findings of the study suggest that resource-backed loans agreements in general, and cocoa and tobacco in particular, should include strict clean development provisions and the implementation of actions to mitigate the negative environmental impact of these loans for borrowing countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信