2019年冠状病毒病南北方中医诊疗规律差异的实证研究。

S U Rui, S U Youzhu, Wang Shuo, Fan Jie, Liu Qingquan, Liu Mifeng
{"title":"2019年冠状病毒病南北方中医诊疗规律差异的实证研究。","authors":"S U Rui, S U Youzhu, Wang Shuo, Fan Jie, Liu Qingquan, Liu Mifeng","doi":"10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the differences in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) diagnosis and treatment rules for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) between Northern and Southern China based on the real-world data from 982 COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive cases of COVID-19 admitted to the TCM department of designated COVID-19 hospitals in eight provinces and cities were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into a Northern and a Southern group according to the location of the admitting hospital. The symptoms, syndrome elements, syndrome distribution and herbal treatments were analyzed. The core prescriptions were extracted using the multiscale backbone-based network comparison algorithm (msbNC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution of syndrome elements showed that dampness was common in Northern and Southern China, wind and heat were more often present in the South, while fire toxin and spleen deficiency were more often encountered in the North. The distribution of syndromes showed that the South was dominated by heat dampness accumulating in the lung (55.69%), while the North was dominated by dampness-toxin stagnating in the lung (44.90%).The results of core prescription mining showed that dispelling dampness, dispersing wind, clearing heat and strengthening spleen were the common treatment methods in Northern and Southern China. For mild cases, Jinyinhua (<i>Flos Lonicerae</i>) and Lianqiao (<i>Fructus Forsythiae Suspensae</i>) were often used in the South to clear heat and relieve exterior symptoms, while Chaihu (<i>Radix Bupleuri Chinensis</i>) and Huangqin (<i>Radix Scutellariae Baicalensis</i>) were often used in the North to relieve muscles by expelling heat. For moderate cases, Chaihu (<i>Radix Bupleuri Chinensis</i>), Qinghao (<i>Herba Artemisiae Annuae</i>), and Shigao (<i>Gypsum Fibrosum</i>) were often used to clear heat of Tri-jiao Channel and stomach in the South, while Fuling (<i>Poria</i>), Chenpi (<i>Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae</i>), and Dangshen (<i>Radix Codonopsis</i>) were often used to invigorate spleen and remove dampness in the North. For severe cases, spleen invigoration and dampness removal as well as relaxing the bowels and discharging heat were often used in the North.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were certain North-South differences in terms of symptoms, syndrome elements and syndrome distribution of COVID-19, as well as differences in core prescriptions during different periods of the disease. The regional differences in the rules of TCM diagnosis and treatment for COVID-19 should be further considered in the process of optimization and revision of relevant treatment guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan","volume":"44 4","pages":"822-829"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11337256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A real-world study of the differences in Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnosis and treatment rules for coronavirus disease 2019 between Northern and Southern China.\",\"authors\":\"S U Rui, S U Youzhu, Wang Shuo, Fan Jie, Liu Qingquan, Liu Mifeng\",\"doi\":\"10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2024.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the differences in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) diagnosis and treatment rules for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) between Northern and Southern China based on the real-world data from 982 COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive cases of COVID-19 admitted to the TCM department of designated COVID-19 hospitals in eight provinces and cities were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into a Northern and a Southern group according to the location of the admitting hospital. The symptoms, syndrome elements, syndrome distribution and herbal treatments were analyzed. The core prescriptions were extracted using the multiscale backbone-based network comparison algorithm (msbNC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution of syndrome elements showed that dampness was common in Northern and Southern China, wind and heat were more often present in the South, while fire toxin and spleen deficiency were more often encountered in the North. The distribution of syndromes showed that the South was dominated by heat dampness accumulating in the lung (55.69%), while the North was dominated by dampness-toxin stagnating in the lung (44.90%).The results of core prescription mining showed that dispelling dampness, dispersing wind, clearing heat and strengthening spleen were the common treatment methods in Northern and Southern China. For mild cases, Jinyinhua (<i>Flos Lonicerae</i>) and Lianqiao (<i>Fructus Forsythiae Suspensae</i>) were often used in the South to clear heat and relieve exterior symptoms, while Chaihu (<i>Radix Bupleuri Chinensis</i>) and Huangqin (<i>Radix Scutellariae Baicalensis</i>) were often used in the North to relieve muscles by expelling heat. For moderate cases, Chaihu (<i>Radix Bupleuri Chinensis</i>), Qinghao (<i>Herba Artemisiae Annuae</i>), and Shigao (<i>Gypsum Fibrosum</i>) were often used to clear heat of Tri-jiao Channel and stomach in the South, while Fuling (<i>Poria</i>), Chenpi (<i>Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae</i>), and Dangshen (<i>Radix Codonopsis</i>) were often used to invigorate spleen and remove dampness in the North. For severe cases, spleen invigoration and dampness removal as well as relaxing the bowels and discharging heat were often used in the North.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were certain North-South differences in terms of symptoms, syndrome elements and syndrome distribution of COVID-19, as well as differences in core prescriptions during different periods of the disease. The regional differences in the rules of TCM diagnosis and treatment for COVID-19 should be further considered in the process of optimization and revision of relevant treatment guidance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"822-829\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11337256/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2024.04.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2024.04.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的根据 982 例 COVID-19 患者的真实数据,探讨中国北方和南方在冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的中医诊疗规则方面的差异:方法:对8个省市COVID-19定点医院中医科收治的所有COVID-19连续病例进行回顾性分析。根据收治医院所在地将患者分为北方组和南方组。分析了症状、证候要素、证候分布和中药治疗。使用基于多尺度骨干网络比较算法(msbNC)提取核心处方:证候分布显示,湿邪常见于中国北方和南方,风热多见于南方,而火毒和脾虚多见于北方。证候分布显示,南方以湿热蕴肺为主(55.69%),北方以湿毒壅肺为主(44.90%)。核心方药挖掘结果显示,祛湿、散风、清热、健脾是南北方常用的治疗方法。对于轻度病例,南方常用金银花、连翘清热解表,北方常用柴胡、黄芩祛热舒筋。对于中度病例,南方常用柴胡、秦艽、石膏清三焦胃热,北方常用茯苓、陈皮、党参健脾利湿。对于重症患者,北方常用健脾利湿、通便泄热的方法:结论:COVID-19 的症状、证候要素和证候分布存在一定的南北差异,不同时期的核心方药也存在差异。在优化和修订相关治疗指南的过程中,应进一步考虑 COVID-19 中医辨证论治规律的地区差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A real-world study of the differences in Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnosis and treatment rules for coronavirus disease 2019 between Northern and Southern China.

Objective: To explore the differences in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) diagnosis and treatment rules for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) between Northern and Southern China based on the real-world data from 982 COVID-19 patients.

Methods: All consecutive cases of COVID-19 admitted to the TCM department of designated COVID-19 hospitals in eight provinces and cities were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into a Northern and a Southern group according to the location of the admitting hospital. The symptoms, syndrome elements, syndrome distribution and herbal treatments were analyzed. The core prescriptions were extracted using the multiscale backbone-based network comparison algorithm (msbNC).

Results: The distribution of syndrome elements showed that dampness was common in Northern and Southern China, wind and heat were more often present in the South, while fire toxin and spleen deficiency were more often encountered in the North. The distribution of syndromes showed that the South was dominated by heat dampness accumulating in the lung (55.69%), while the North was dominated by dampness-toxin stagnating in the lung (44.90%).The results of core prescription mining showed that dispelling dampness, dispersing wind, clearing heat and strengthening spleen were the common treatment methods in Northern and Southern China. For mild cases, Jinyinhua (Flos Lonicerae) and Lianqiao (Fructus Forsythiae Suspensae) were often used in the South to clear heat and relieve exterior symptoms, while Chaihu (Radix Bupleuri Chinensis) and Huangqin (Radix Scutellariae Baicalensis) were often used in the North to relieve muscles by expelling heat. For moderate cases, Chaihu (Radix Bupleuri Chinensis), Qinghao (Herba Artemisiae Annuae), and Shigao (Gypsum Fibrosum) were often used to clear heat of Tri-jiao Channel and stomach in the South, while Fuling (Poria), Chenpi (Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae), and Dangshen (Radix Codonopsis) were often used to invigorate spleen and remove dampness in the North. For severe cases, spleen invigoration and dampness removal as well as relaxing the bowels and discharging heat were often used in the North.

Conclusion: There were certain North-South differences in terms of symptoms, syndrome elements and syndrome distribution of COVID-19, as well as differences in core prescriptions during different periods of the disease. The regional differences in the rules of TCM diagnosis and treatment for COVID-19 should be further considered in the process of optimization and revision of relevant treatment guidance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信