支持乳腺癌妇女坚持用药的四项干预措施的可接受性:分数因子试点优化试验的过程评估。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Prevention Science Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1007/s11121-024-01711-9
Sophie M C Green, Nikki Rousseau, Louise H Hall, David P French, Christopher D Graham, Kelly E Lloyd, Michelle Collinson, Pei Loo Ow, Christopher Taylor, Daniel Howdon, Robbie Foy, Rebecca Walwyn, Jane Clark, Catherine Parbutt, Jo Waller, Jacqueline Buxton, Sally J L Moore, Galina Velikova, Amanda Farrin, Samuel G Smith
{"title":"支持乳腺癌妇女坚持用药的四项干预措施的可接受性:分数因子试点优化试验的过程评估。","authors":"Sophie M C Green, Nikki Rousseau, Louise H Hall, David P French, Christopher D Graham, Kelly E Lloyd, Michelle Collinson, Pei Loo Ow, Christopher Taylor, Daniel Howdon, Robbie Foy, Rebecca Walwyn, Jane Clark, Catherine Parbutt, Jo Waller, Jacqueline Buxton, Sally J L Moore, Galina Velikova, Amanda Farrin, Samuel G Smith","doi":"10.1007/s11121-024-01711-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces mortality in early-stage breast cancer, but adherence is low. We developed a multicomponent intervention to support AET adherence comprising: text messages, information leaflet, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and side-effect website. Guided by the multiphase optimization strategy, the intervention components were tested in the ROSETA pilot optimization trial. Our mixed-methods process evaluation investigated component acceptability. The pilot optimization trial used a 2<sup>4-1</sup> fractional factorial design. Fifty-two women prescribed AET were randomized to one of eight experimental conditions, containing unique component combinations. An acceptability questionnaire was administered 4 months post-randomization, and semi-structured interviews with 20 participants further explored acceptability. Assessments were guided by four constructs of the theoretical framework of acceptability: affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, and coherence. Quantitative and qualitative findings were triangulated to identify agreements/disagreements. There were high overall acceptability scores (median = 14-15/20, range = 11-20). There was agreement between the qualitative and quantitative findings when triangulated. Most participants \"liked\" or \"strongly liked\" all components and reported they required low effort to engage in. Between 50% (leaflet) and 65% (SMS) \"agreed\" or \"strongly agreed,\" it was clear how each component would help adherence. Perceived effectiveness was mixed, with 35.0% (text messages) to 55.6% (ACT) of participants \"agreeing\" or \"strongly agreeing\" that each component would improve their adherence. Interview data provided suggestions for improvements. The four components were acceptable to women with breast cancer and will be refined. Mixed-methods and triangulation were useful methodological approaches and could be applied in other optimization trial process evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability of Four Intervention Components Supporting Medication Adherence in Women with Breast Cancer: a Process Evaluation of a Fractional Factorial Pilot Optimization Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie M C Green, Nikki Rousseau, Louise H Hall, David P French, Christopher D Graham, Kelly E Lloyd, Michelle Collinson, Pei Loo Ow, Christopher Taylor, Daniel Howdon, Robbie Foy, Rebecca Walwyn, Jane Clark, Catherine Parbutt, Jo Waller, Jacqueline Buxton, Sally J L Moore, Galina Velikova, Amanda Farrin, Samuel G Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11121-024-01711-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces mortality in early-stage breast cancer, but adherence is low. We developed a multicomponent intervention to support AET adherence comprising: text messages, information leaflet, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and side-effect website. Guided by the multiphase optimization strategy, the intervention components were tested in the ROSETA pilot optimization trial. Our mixed-methods process evaluation investigated component acceptability. The pilot optimization trial used a 2<sup>4-1</sup> fractional factorial design. Fifty-two women prescribed AET were randomized to one of eight experimental conditions, containing unique component combinations. An acceptability questionnaire was administered 4 months post-randomization, and semi-structured interviews with 20 participants further explored acceptability. Assessments were guided by four constructs of the theoretical framework of acceptability: affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, and coherence. Quantitative and qualitative findings were triangulated to identify agreements/disagreements. There were high overall acceptability scores (median = 14-15/20, range = 11-20). There was agreement between the qualitative and quantitative findings when triangulated. Most participants \\\"liked\\\" or \\\"strongly liked\\\" all components and reported they required low effort to engage in. Between 50% (leaflet) and 65% (SMS) \\\"agreed\\\" or \\\"strongly agreed,\\\" it was clear how each component would help adherence. Perceived effectiveness was mixed, with 35.0% (text messages) to 55.6% (ACT) of participants \\\"agreeing\\\" or \\\"strongly agreeing\\\" that each component would improve their adherence. Interview data provided suggestions for improvements. The four components were acceptable to women with breast cancer and will be refined. Mixed-methods and triangulation were useful methodological approaches and could be applied in other optimization trial process evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prevention Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519312/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prevention Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-024-01711-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-024-01711-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

辅助内分泌疗法(AET)可降低早期乳腺癌患者的死亡率,但其依从性却很低。我们开发了一种支持坚持内分泌治疗的多成分干预措施,包括:短信、信息传单、接受与承诺疗法(ACT)和副作用网站。在多阶段优化策略的指导下,这些干预措施在 ROSETA 试点优化试验中进行了测试。我们的混合方法过程评估调查了各组成部分的可接受性。试点优化试验采用了 24-1 分因子设计。52名开具AET处方的妇女被随机分配到八个实验条件之一,其中包含独特的成分组合。随机化后 4 个月进行了可接受性问卷调查,并对 20 名参与者进行了半结构化访谈,进一步探讨了可接受性问题。评估以可接受性理论框架的四个结构为指导:情感态度、负担、感知有效性和连贯性。对定量和定性结果进行了三角测量,以确定一致/不一致之处。总体可接受性得分较高(中位数 = 14-15/20,范围 = 11-20)。对定性和定量结果进行三角分析后,发现两者之间存在一致性。大多数参与者 "喜欢 "或 "非常喜欢 "所有内容,并表示参与这些内容所需的努力较少。50%(传单)和 65%(短信)的参与者 "同意 "或 "非常同意 "每项内容对坚持治疗的帮助。对有效性的看法不一,35.0%(短信)到 55.6%(ACT)的参与者 "同意 "或 "非常同意 "每项内容都能提高他们的依从性。访谈数据提供了改进建议。患有乳腺癌的妇女可以接受这四个组成部分,并将对其进行改进。混合方法和三角测量是有用的方法论,可用于其他优化试验过程评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability of Four Intervention Components Supporting Medication Adherence in Women with Breast Cancer: a Process Evaluation of a Fractional Factorial Pilot Optimization Trial.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces mortality in early-stage breast cancer, but adherence is low. We developed a multicomponent intervention to support AET adherence comprising: text messages, information leaflet, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and side-effect website. Guided by the multiphase optimization strategy, the intervention components were tested in the ROSETA pilot optimization trial. Our mixed-methods process evaluation investigated component acceptability. The pilot optimization trial used a 24-1 fractional factorial design. Fifty-two women prescribed AET were randomized to one of eight experimental conditions, containing unique component combinations. An acceptability questionnaire was administered 4 months post-randomization, and semi-structured interviews with 20 participants further explored acceptability. Assessments were guided by four constructs of the theoretical framework of acceptability: affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, and coherence. Quantitative and qualitative findings were triangulated to identify agreements/disagreements. There were high overall acceptability scores (median = 14-15/20, range = 11-20). There was agreement between the qualitative and quantitative findings when triangulated. Most participants "liked" or "strongly liked" all components and reported they required low effort to engage in. Between 50% (leaflet) and 65% (SMS) "agreed" or "strongly agreed," it was clear how each component would help adherence. Perceived effectiveness was mixed, with 35.0% (text messages) to 55.6% (ACT) of participants "agreeing" or "strongly agreeing" that each component would improve their adherence. Interview data provided suggestions for improvements. The four components were acceptable to women with breast cancer and will be refined. Mixed-methods and triangulation were useful methodological approaches and could be applied in other optimization trial process evaluations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prevention Science
Prevention Science PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.40%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信