甜椒基因型对本地假单胞菌 A32 处理的不同反应:对抗旱能力的影响。

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Aleksandra Mesaroš, Iva Atanasković, Marija Nedeljković, Slaviša Stanković, Jelena Lozo
{"title":"甜椒基因型对本地假单胞菌 A32 处理的不同反应:对抗旱能力的影响。","authors":"Aleksandra Mesaroš, Iva Atanasković, Marija Nedeljković, Slaviša Stanković, Jelena Lozo","doi":"10.1093/jambio/lxae190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the potential of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacterium (PGPB), Pseudomonas putida A32, to mitigate drought stress in two bell pepper genotypes, Amfora 19 and Amfora 26, and to assess the genotype-specific responses to bacterial treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The isolate P. putida A32 was selected for its remarkable beneficial properties, exhibiting 13 out of 14 traits tested. Under drought conditions, Amfora 26 showed increased relative water content and decreased H2O2 and malondialdehyde following bacterial treatment, while Amfora 19 exhibited enhanced growth parameters but responded less to bacterial treatment regarding drought parameters. However, Amfora 19 displayed inherent drought tolerance mechanisms, as indicated by lower stress parameters compared to Amfora 26.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study emphasizes the importance of genotype-specific responses to PGPB treatment and the mechanisms of drought tolerance in peppers. Pseudomonas putida A32 effectively mitigated drought stress in both genotypes, with differential responses influenced by plant genotype. Our study confirmed our initial hypothesis that Amfora 19, as a genotype tolerant to biotic stress, is also more tolerant to abiotic stress. Understanding these interactions is crucial for the development of customized strategies to improve plant productivity and tolerance to drought.</p>","PeriodicalId":15036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential responses of bell pepper genotypes to indigenous Pseudomonas putida A32 treatment: implications for drought resilience.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandra Mesaroš, Iva Atanasković, Marija Nedeljković, Slaviša Stanković, Jelena Lozo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jambio/lxae190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the potential of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacterium (PGPB), Pseudomonas putida A32, to mitigate drought stress in two bell pepper genotypes, Amfora 19 and Amfora 26, and to assess the genotype-specific responses to bacterial treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The isolate P. putida A32 was selected for its remarkable beneficial properties, exhibiting 13 out of 14 traits tested. Under drought conditions, Amfora 26 showed increased relative water content and decreased H2O2 and malondialdehyde following bacterial treatment, while Amfora 19 exhibited enhanced growth parameters but responded less to bacterial treatment regarding drought parameters. However, Amfora 19 displayed inherent drought tolerance mechanisms, as indicated by lower stress parameters compared to Amfora 26.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study emphasizes the importance of genotype-specific responses to PGPB treatment and the mechanisms of drought tolerance in peppers. Pseudomonas putida A32 effectively mitigated drought stress in both genotypes, with differential responses influenced by plant genotype. Our study confirmed our initial hypothesis that Amfora 19, as a genotype tolerant to biotic stress, is also more tolerant to abiotic stress. Understanding these interactions is crucial for the development of customized strategies to improve plant productivity and tolerance to drought.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxae190\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxae190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估内生植物生长促进菌(PGPB)--假单胞菌 A32--在两种甜椒基因型 Amfora 19 和 Amfora 26 中缓解干旱胁迫的潜力,并评估基因型对细菌处理的特异性反应:筛选出的分离株 P. putida A32 具有显著的有益特性,在 14 个测试性状中表现出 13 个。在干旱条件下,经细菌处理后,Amfora 26 的相对含水量(RWC)提高,H2O2 和丙二醛降低,而 Amfora 19 的生长参数提高,但在干旱参数方面对细菌处理的反应较小。然而,与 Amfora 26 相比,Amfora 19 的胁迫参数较低,这表明 Amfora 19 具有固有的耐旱机制:该研究强调了辣椒基因型对 PGPB 处理的特异性反应和耐旱机制的重要性。P. putida A32 能有效缓解两种基因型的干旱胁迫,植物基因型不同,反应也不同。我们的研究证实了我们最初的假设,即 Amfora 19 作为一种耐受生物胁迫的基因型,也更耐受非生物胁迫。了解这些相互作用对于开发定制战略以提高植物生产力和抗旱能力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential responses of bell pepper genotypes to indigenous Pseudomonas putida A32 treatment: implications for drought resilience.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the potential of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacterium (PGPB), Pseudomonas putida A32, to mitigate drought stress in two bell pepper genotypes, Amfora 19 and Amfora 26, and to assess the genotype-specific responses to bacterial treatment.

Methods and results: The isolate P. putida A32 was selected for its remarkable beneficial properties, exhibiting 13 out of 14 traits tested. Under drought conditions, Amfora 26 showed increased relative water content and decreased H2O2 and malondialdehyde following bacterial treatment, while Amfora 19 exhibited enhanced growth parameters but responded less to bacterial treatment regarding drought parameters. However, Amfora 19 displayed inherent drought tolerance mechanisms, as indicated by lower stress parameters compared to Amfora 26.

Conclusions: The study emphasizes the importance of genotype-specific responses to PGPB treatment and the mechanisms of drought tolerance in peppers. Pseudomonas putida A32 effectively mitigated drought stress in both genotypes, with differential responses influenced by plant genotype. Our study confirmed our initial hypothesis that Amfora 19, as a genotype tolerant to biotic stress, is also more tolerant to abiotic stress. Understanding these interactions is crucial for the development of customized strategies to improve plant productivity and tolerance to drought.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Journal of Applied Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.50%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信