鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG 作为早产儿益生菌:菌株特异性系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Anitha Ananthan, Haribalakrishna Balasubramanian, Chandra Rath, Saravanan Muthusamy, Shripada Rao, Sanjay Patole
{"title":"鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG 作为早产儿益生菌:菌株特异性系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Anitha Ananthan, Haribalakrishna Balasubramanian, Chandra Rath, Saravanan Muthusamy, Shripada Rao, Sanjay Patole","doi":"10.1038/s41430-024-01474-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) is a widely used and extensively researched probiotic. Probiotic effects are considered to be strain specific. We aimed to comprehensively assess the strain-specific effects of LGG in preterm infants. A systematic review of RCTs and non-RCTs to evaluate the effect of LGG in preterm infants. We followed the Cochrane methodology, and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) statement for conducting and reporting this review. We searched the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases till December 2023. The review was registered in PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022324933. Meta-analysis of data from RCTs that used LGG as the sole probiotic showed significantly lower risk of NEC ≥Stage II [5 RCTs, n = 851, RR:0.50 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.93), P = 0.03] in the LGG group. There was no significant difference in the risk of LOS [7 RCTs, n = 1037, RR:1.08 (95% CI 0.84, 1.39), P = 0.55], mortality [3 RCTs, n = 207, RR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.42, 2.33), P = 0.99], time to reach full feeds [2 RCTs, n = 19, SMD = 0.11 days (95% CI: −0.22, 0.45), P = 0.51] and duration of hospital stay [3 RCTs, n = 293, SMD: −0.14 days (95% CI: −0.37 to 0.09), P = 0.23]. Meta-analysis of data from non-RCTs showed no significant effect of LGG on NEC, LOS, and mortality. RCTs showed beneficial effects of LGG when used as the sole probiotic in reducing the risk of NEC, whereas observational studies did not. Strain-specific systematic review of LGG provides important data for guiding research and clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":11927,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"78 10","pages":"830-846"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-024-01474-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as a probiotic for preterm infants: a strain specific systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Anitha Ananthan, Haribalakrishna Balasubramanian, Chandra Rath, Saravanan Muthusamy, Shripada Rao, Sanjay Patole\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41430-024-01474-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) is a widely used and extensively researched probiotic. Probiotic effects are considered to be strain specific. We aimed to comprehensively assess the strain-specific effects of LGG in preterm infants. A systematic review of RCTs and non-RCTs to evaluate the effect of LGG in preterm infants. We followed the Cochrane methodology, and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) statement for conducting and reporting this review. We searched the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases till December 2023. The review was registered in PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022324933. Meta-analysis of data from RCTs that used LGG as the sole probiotic showed significantly lower risk of NEC ≥Stage II [5 RCTs, n = 851, RR:0.50 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.93), P = 0.03] in the LGG group. There was no significant difference in the risk of LOS [7 RCTs, n = 1037, RR:1.08 (95% CI 0.84, 1.39), P = 0.55], mortality [3 RCTs, n = 207, RR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.42, 2.33), P = 0.99], time to reach full feeds [2 RCTs, n = 19, SMD = 0.11 days (95% CI: −0.22, 0.45), P = 0.51] and duration of hospital stay [3 RCTs, n = 293, SMD: −0.14 days (95% CI: −0.37 to 0.09), P = 0.23]. Meta-analysis of data from non-RCTs showed no significant effect of LGG on NEC, LOS, and mortality. RCTs showed beneficial effects of LGG when used as the sole probiotic in reducing the risk of NEC, whereas observational studies did not. Strain-specific systematic review of LGG provides important data for guiding research and clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"78 10\",\"pages\":\"830-846\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-024-01474-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-024-01474-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-024-01474-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG(LGG)是一种应用广泛、研究深入的益生菌。益生菌的作用被认为具有菌株特异性。我们旨在全面评估 LGG 对早产儿的菌株特异性作用。我们对研究性试验和非研究性试验进行了系统回顾,以评估 LGG 对早产儿的作用。我们遵循 Cochrane 方法和系统性综述首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 声明来开展和报告本综述。我们检索了 Cochrane 对照试验中央登记册、PubMed、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库,直至 2023 年 12 月。本综述已在 PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022324933 中注册。对使用 LGG 作为唯一益生菌的 RCT 数据进行的 Meta 分析表明,LGG 组 NEC ≥ II 期的风险显著降低 [5 项 RCT,n = 851,RR:0.50 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.93),P = 0.03]。LOS风险[7项研究,n = 1037,RR:1.08(95% CI 0.84,1.39),P = 0.55]、死亡率[3项研究,n = 207,RR:0.99(95% CI:0.42,2.33),P = 0.99]、完全进食时间[2 项 RCT,n = 19,SMD = 0.11 天(95% CI:-0.22,0.45),P = 0.51]和住院时间[3 项 RCT,n = 293,SMD:-0.14 天(95% CI:-0.37 至 0.09),P = 0.23]。对非研究性试验数据进行的 Meta 分析表明,LGG 对 NEC、LOS 和死亡率无显著影响。研究性试验显示,LGG 作为唯一的益生菌可降低 NEC 风险,而观察性研究则未显示出有益效果。针对特定菌株的 LGG 系统性综述为指导研究和临床实践提供了重要数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as a probiotic for preterm infants: a strain specific systematic review and meta-analysis

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as a probiotic for preterm infants: a strain specific systematic review and meta-analysis

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as a probiotic for preterm infants: a strain specific systematic review and meta-analysis
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) is a widely used and extensively researched probiotic. Probiotic effects are considered to be strain specific. We aimed to comprehensively assess the strain-specific effects of LGG in preterm infants. A systematic review of RCTs and non-RCTs to evaluate the effect of LGG in preterm infants. We followed the Cochrane methodology, and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) statement for conducting and reporting this review. We searched the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases till December 2023. The review was registered in PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022324933. Meta-analysis of data from RCTs that used LGG as the sole probiotic showed significantly lower risk of NEC ≥Stage II [5 RCTs, n = 851, RR:0.50 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.93), P = 0.03] in the LGG group. There was no significant difference in the risk of LOS [7 RCTs, n = 1037, RR:1.08 (95% CI 0.84, 1.39), P = 0.55], mortality [3 RCTs, n = 207, RR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.42, 2.33), P = 0.99], time to reach full feeds [2 RCTs, n = 19, SMD = 0.11 days (95% CI: −0.22, 0.45), P = 0.51] and duration of hospital stay [3 RCTs, n = 293, SMD: −0.14 days (95% CI: −0.37 to 0.09), P = 0.23]. Meta-analysis of data from non-RCTs showed no significant effect of LGG on NEC, LOS, and mortality. RCTs showed beneficial effects of LGG when used as the sole probiotic in reducing the risk of NEC, whereas observational studies did not. Strain-specific systematic review of LGG provides important data for guiding research and clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (EJCN) is an international, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of human and clinical nutrition. The journal welcomes original research, reviews, case reports and brief communications based on clinical, metabolic and epidemiological studies that describe methodologies, mechanisms, associations and benefits of nutritional interventions for clinical disease and health promotion. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: Nutrition and Health (including climate and ecological aspects) Metabolism & Metabolomics Genomics and personalized strategies in nutrition Nutrition during the early life cycle Health issues and nutrition in the elderly Phenotyping in clinical nutrition Nutrition in acute and chronic diseases The double burden of ''malnutrition'': Under-nutrition and Obesity Prevention of Non Communicable Diseases (NCD)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信