之间的距离:将随机模型与时间序列数据进行比较的算法方法。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Brock D Sherlock, Marko A A Boon, Maria Vlasiou, Adelle C F Coster
{"title":"之间的距离:将随机模型与时间序列数据进行比较的算法方法。","authors":"Brock D Sherlock, Marko A A Boon, Maria Vlasiou, Adelle C F Coster","doi":"10.1007/s11538-024-01331-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While mean-field models of cellular operations have identified dominant processes at the macroscopic scale, stochastic models may provide further insight into mechanisms at the molecular scale. In order to identify plausible stochastic models, quantitative comparisons between the models and the experimental data are required. The data for these systems have small sample sizes and time-evolving distributions. The aim of this study is to identify appropriate distance metrics for the quantitative comparison of stochastic model outputs and time-evolving stochastic measurements of a system. We identify distance metrics with features suitable for driving parameter inference, model comparison, and model validation, constrained by data from multiple experimental protocols. In this study, stochastic model outputs are compared to synthetic data across three scales: that of the data at the points the system is sampled during the time course of each type of experiment; a combined distance across the time course of each experiment; and a combined distance across all the experiments. Two broad categories of comparators at each point were considered, based on the empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) of the data and of the model outputs: discrete based measures such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance, and integrated measures such as the Wasserstein-1 distance between the ECDFs. It was found that the discrete based measures were highly sensitive to parameter changes near the synthetic data parameters, but were largely insensitive otherwise, whereas the integrated distances had smoother transitions as the parameters approached the true values. The integrated measures were also found to be robust to noise added to the synthetic data, replicating experimental error. The characteristics of the identified distances provides the basis for the design of an algorithm suitable for fitting stochastic models to real world stochastic data.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Distance Between: An Algorithmic Approach to Comparing Stochastic Models to Time-Series Data.\",\"authors\":\"Brock D Sherlock, Marko A A Boon, Maria Vlasiou, Adelle C F Coster\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11538-024-01331-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While mean-field models of cellular operations have identified dominant processes at the macroscopic scale, stochastic models may provide further insight into mechanisms at the molecular scale. In order to identify plausible stochastic models, quantitative comparisons between the models and the experimental data are required. The data for these systems have small sample sizes and time-evolving distributions. The aim of this study is to identify appropriate distance metrics for the quantitative comparison of stochastic model outputs and time-evolving stochastic measurements of a system. We identify distance metrics with features suitable for driving parameter inference, model comparison, and model validation, constrained by data from multiple experimental protocols. In this study, stochastic model outputs are compared to synthetic data across three scales: that of the data at the points the system is sampled during the time course of each type of experiment; a combined distance across the time course of each experiment; and a combined distance across all the experiments. Two broad categories of comparators at each point were considered, based on the empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) of the data and of the model outputs: discrete based measures such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance, and integrated measures such as the Wasserstein-1 distance between the ECDFs. It was found that the discrete based measures were highly sensitive to parameter changes near the synthetic data parameters, but were largely insensitive otherwise, whereas the integrated distances had smoother transitions as the parameters approached the true values. The integrated measures were also found to be robust to noise added to the synthetic data, replicating experimental error. The characteristics of the identified distances provides the basis for the design of an algorithm suitable for fitting stochastic models to real world stochastic data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282162/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-024-01331-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-024-01331-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然细胞运行的均场模型已经确定了宏观尺度上的主导过程,但随机模型可能会让人们进一步了解分子尺度上的机制。为了确定可信的随机模型,需要对模型和实验数据进行定量比较。这些系统的数据样本量小,分布随时间不断变化。本研究的目的是确定适当的距离度量,用于定量比较随机模型输出和系统的时间演化随机测量结果。我们根据多个实验方案的数据,确定了具有适合驱动参数推断、模型比较和模型验证的特征的距离度量。在这项研究中,随机模型输出与合成数据在三个尺度上进行了比较:每种类型实验时间过程中系统采样点的数据;每个实验时间过程中的综合距离;所有实验的综合距离。根据数据和模型输出的经验累积分布函数(ECDF),考虑了每一点上的两大类比较器:基于离散的度量(如 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 距离)和综合度量(如 ECDF 之间的 Wasserstein-1 距离)。研究发现,基于离散度量的方法对合成数据参数附近的参数变化高度敏感,但对其他参数变化基本不敏感,而综合距离则在参数接近真实值时具有更平滑的过渡。研究还发现,综合测量法对合成数据中添加的噪声具有鲁棒性,可以复制实验误差。已识别距离的特征为设计一种适合将随机模型拟合到真实世界随机数据的算法奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Distance Between: An Algorithmic Approach to Comparing Stochastic Models to Time-Series Data.

The Distance Between: An Algorithmic Approach to Comparing Stochastic Models to Time-Series Data.

While mean-field models of cellular operations have identified dominant processes at the macroscopic scale, stochastic models may provide further insight into mechanisms at the molecular scale. In order to identify plausible stochastic models, quantitative comparisons between the models and the experimental data are required. The data for these systems have small sample sizes and time-evolving distributions. The aim of this study is to identify appropriate distance metrics for the quantitative comparison of stochastic model outputs and time-evolving stochastic measurements of a system. We identify distance metrics with features suitable for driving parameter inference, model comparison, and model validation, constrained by data from multiple experimental protocols. In this study, stochastic model outputs are compared to synthetic data across three scales: that of the data at the points the system is sampled during the time course of each type of experiment; a combined distance across the time course of each experiment; and a combined distance across all the experiments. Two broad categories of comparators at each point were considered, based on the empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) of the data and of the model outputs: discrete based measures such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance, and integrated measures such as the Wasserstein-1 distance between the ECDFs. It was found that the discrete based measures were highly sensitive to parameter changes near the synthetic data parameters, but were largely insensitive otherwise, whereas the integrated distances had smoother transitions as the parameters approached the true values. The integrated measures were also found to be robust to noise added to the synthetic data, replicating experimental error. The characteristics of the identified distances provides the basis for the design of an algorithm suitable for fitting stochastic models to real world stochastic data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信