David Pujal , Jorge Escudero , Pol Cabrera, Laura Bos, Carlos Vargas-Chávez, Rosa Fernández, Xavier Bellés, José Luis Maestro
{"title":"蟑螂三种胰岛素受体的功能冗余。","authors":"David Pujal , Jorge Escudero , Pol Cabrera, Laura Bos, Carlos Vargas-Chávez, Rosa Fernández, Xavier Bellés, José Luis Maestro","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmb.2024.104161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gene duplication is a fundamental evolutionary process which provides opportunities to acquire new gene functions. In the case of the insulin receptors (InRs) in cockroaches and close-related insects, two successive duplications determined the occurrence of three InR genes: <em>InR2</em>, <em>InR1</em> and <em>InR3</em>, the last two forming a sister cluster to <em>InR2</em>. The biological role of each of the gene duplicates and whether they resulted from neofunctionalization or subfunctionalization is still unclear. The analysis of the sequences from different lineages did not detect positive selection as driving the divergence of <em>InR1</em> and <em>InR3</em>, discarding neofunctionalization, and suggesting that there is no functional divergence between both gene copies. Using the cockroach <em>Blattella germanica</em> as a model, we have determined that <em>BgInR2</em> is the gene with the highest expression levels in all the tissues analyzed, both in adult females and males, as well as in nymphs and embryos. <em>BgInR3</em> is second in expression levels while <em>BgInR1</em> is expressed at lower levels and only in some tissues. The selective depletion by RNAi of each of the three InRs, analyzed in terms of phenotype and fat body transcriptomic profiles, resulted in essentially redundant effects, with a magnitude approximately proportional to the level of expression of the respective InR. Therefore, the results indicate that the InR duplicates likely experienced a subfunctionalization process, by which the three InRs maintained similar functions but contributing to those functions proportionally to their expression levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":330,"journal":{"name":"Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 104161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965174824000924/pdfft?md5=42b67627581a12efb6d2590b6d799a36&pid=1-s2.0-S0965174824000924-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional redundancy of the three insulin receptors of cockroaches\",\"authors\":\"David Pujal , Jorge Escudero , Pol Cabrera, Laura Bos, Carlos Vargas-Chávez, Rosa Fernández, Xavier Bellés, José Luis Maestro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ibmb.2024.104161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Gene duplication is a fundamental evolutionary process which provides opportunities to acquire new gene functions. In the case of the insulin receptors (InRs) in cockroaches and close-related insects, two successive duplications determined the occurrence of three InR genes: <em>InR2</em>, <em>InR1</em> and <em>InR3</em>, the last two forming a sister cluster to <em>InR2</em>. The biological role of each of the gene duplicates and whether they resulted from neofunctionalization or subfunctionalization is still unclear. The analysis of the sequences from different lineages did not detect positive selection as driving the divergence of <em>InR1</em> and <em>InR3</em>, discarding neofunctionalization, and suggesting that there is no functional divergence between both gene copies. Using the cockroach <em>Blattella germanica</em> as a model, we have determined that <em>BgInR2</em> is the gene with the highest expression levels in all the tissues analyzed, both in adult females and males, as well as in nymphs and embryos. <em>BgInR3</em> is second in expression levels while <em>BgInR1</em> is expressed at lower levels and only in some tissues. The selective depletion by RNAi of each of the three InRs, analyzed in terms of phenotype and fat body transcriptomic profiles, resulted in essentially redundant effects, with a magnitude approximately proportional to the level of expression of the respective InR. Therefore, the results indicate that the InR duplicates likely experienced a subfunctionalization process, by which the three InRs maintained similar functions but contributing to those functions proportionally to their expression levels.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology\",\"volume\":\"172 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965174824000924/pdfft?md5=42b67627581a12efb6d2590b6d799a36&pid=1-s2.0-S0965174824000924-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965174824000924\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965174824000924","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Functional redundancy of the three insulin receptors of cockroaches
Gene duplication is a fundamental evolutionary process which provides opportunities to acquire new gene functions. In the case of the insulin receptors (InRs) in cockroaches and close-related insects, two successive duplications determined the occurrence of three InR genes: InR2, InR1 and InR3, the last two forming a sister cluster to InR2. The biological role of each of the gene duplicates and whether they resulted from neofunctionalization or subfunctionalization is still unclear. The analysis of the sequences from different lineages did not detect positive selection as driving the divergence of InR1 and InR3, discarding neofunctionalization, and suggesting that there is no functional divergence between both gene copies. Using the cockroach Blattella germanica as a model, we have determined that BgInR2 is the gene with the highest expression levels in all the tissues analyzed, both in adult females and males, as well as in nymphs and embryos. BgInR3 is second in expression levels while BgInR1 is expressed at lower levels and only in some tissues. The selective depletion by RNAi of each of the three InRs, analyzed in terms of phenotype and fat body transcriptomic profiles, resulted in essentially redundant effects, with a magnitude approximately proportional to the level of expression of the respective InR. Therefore, the results indicate that the InR duplicates likely experienced a subfunctionalization process, by which the three InRs maintained similar functions but contributing to those functions proportionally to their expression levels.
期刊介绍:
This international journal publishes original contributions and mini-reviews in the fields of insect biochemistry and insect molecular biology. Main areas of interest are neurochemistry, hormone and pheromone biochemistry, enzymes and metabolism, hormone action and gene regulation, gene characterization and structure, pharmacology, immunology and cell and tissue culture. Papers on the biochemistry and molecular biology of other groups of arthropods are published if of general interest to the readership. Technique papers will be considered for publication if they significantly advance the field of insect biochemistry and molecular biology in the opinion of the Editors and Editorial Board.