关于过敏性鼻炎药物治疗的理想效果和不良效果的系统综述议定书,为 ARIA 2024 指南提供信息。

Allergologie select Pub Date : 2024-07-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5414/ALX02515E
Rafael José Vieira, Maria Inês Torres, Antonio Bognanni, Sara Gil-Mata, Renato Ferreira-da-Silva, Nuno Lourenço-Silva, António Cardoso-Fernandes, André Ferreira, Henrique Ferreira-Cardoso, João Teles, Miguel Campos-Lopes, João A Fonseca, Juan José Yepes-Nuñez, Ludger Klimek, Torsten Zuberbier, Holger Schünemann, Jean Bousquet, Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
{"title":"关于过敏性鼻炎药物治疗的理想效果和不良效果的系统综述议定书,为 ARIA 2024 指南提供信息。","authors":"Rafael José Vieira, Maria Inês Torres, Antonio Bognanni, Sara Gil-Mata, Renato Ferreira-da-Silva, Nuno Lourenço-Silva, António Cardoso-Fernandes, André Ferreira, Henrique Ferreira-Cardoso, João Teles, Miguel Campos-Lopes, João A Fonseca, Juan José Yepes-Nuñez, Ludger Klimek, Torsten Zuberbier, Holger Schünemann, Jean Bousquet, Bernardo Sousa-Pinto","doi":"10.5414/ALX02515E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is insufficient evidence regarding the comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments of allergic rhinitis (AR). In the context of informing the 2024 revision of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines, we plan to perform three systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the desirable and undesirable effects (i) between intranasal and oral medications for AR; (ii) between combinations of intranasal and oral medications versus nasal or oral medications alone; and (iii) among different intranasal specific medications. We will search four electronic bibliographic databases and three clinical trials databases for RCTs examining patients ≥ 12 years old with seasonal or perennial AR. Assessed outcomes will include the Total Nasal Symptom Score, the Total Ocular Symptom Score, and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. We will assess the methodological quality of included primary studies by using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. If appropriate, we will perform a pairwise random-effects meta-analysis for each pair of assessed medication classes and outcomes, as well as a network meta-analysis to assess the comparative efficacy of intranasal medications among each other. Heterogeneity will be explored by sensitivity and subgroup analyses. This set of systematic reviews will allow for a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological interventions for AR and inform recommendations in the context of the ARIA guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":101298,"journal":{"name":"Allergologie select","volume":"8 ","pages":"270-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocol for the systematic reviews on the desirable and undesirable effects of pharmacological treatments of allergic rhinitis informing the ARIA 2024 guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael José Vieira, Maria Inês Torres, Antonio Bognanni, Sara Gil-Mata, Renato Ferreira-da-Silva, Nuno Lourenço-Silva, António Cardoso-Fernandes, André Ferreira, Henrique Ferreira-Cardoso, João Teles, Miguel Campos-Lopes, João A Fonseca, Juan José Yepes-Nuñez, Ludger Klimek, Torsten Zuberbier, Holger Schünemann, Jean Bousquet, Bernardo Sousa-Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/ALX02515E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is insufficient evidence regarding the comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments of allergic rhinitis (AR). In the context of informing the 2024 revision of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines, we plan to perform three systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the desirable and undesirable effects (i) between intranasal and oral medications for AR; (ii) between combinations of intranasal and oral medications versus nasal or oral medications alone; and (iii) among different intranasal specific medications. We will search four electronic bibliographic databases and three clinical trials databases for RCTs examining patients ≥ 12 years old with seasonal or perennial AR. Assessed outcomes will include the Total Nasal Symptom Score, the Total Ocular Symptom Score, and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. We will assess the methodological quality of included primary studies by using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. If appropriate, we will perform a pairwise random-effects meta-analysis for each pair of assessed medication classes and outcomes, as well as a network meta-analysis to assess the comparative efficacy of intranasal medications among each other. Heterogeneity will be explored by sensitivity and subgroup analyses. This set of systematic reviews will allow for a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological interventions for AR and inform recommendations in the context of the ARIA guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergologie select\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"270-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270335/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergologie select\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02515E\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergologie select","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02515E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于过敏性鼻炎(AR)药物治疗的疗效和安全性的比较证据不足。为了给 2024 年修订的《过敏性鼻炎及其对哮喘的影响》(ARIA)指南提供信息,我们计划对随机对照试验(RCT)进行三项系统综述,比较 (i) 鼻内用药和口服药物治疗 AR 的理想效果和不良效果;(ii) 鼻内用药和口服药物的组合与单独使用鼻腔或口腔药物的组合;(iii) 不同鼻内用药之间的理想效果和不良效果。我们将在四个电子文献数据库和三个临床试验数据库中搜索对年龄≥ 12 岁的季节性或常年性 AR 患者进行研究的 RCT。评估结果将包括鼻部症状总分、眼部症状总分和鼻结膜炎生活质量问卷。我们将使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估纳入的主要研究的方法学质量。如果合适,我们将对每对评估的药物类别和结果进行配对随机效应荟萃分析,并进行网络荟萃分析,以评估鼻内用药之间的疗效比较。将通过敏感性分析和亚组分析来探讨异质性。这组系统综述将有助于全面评估药物干预治疗 AR 的有效性和安全性,并为 ARIA 指南的建议提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protocol for the systematic reviews on the desirable and undesirable effects of pharmacological treatments of allergic rhinitis informing the ARIA 2024 guidelines.

There is insufficient evidence regarding the comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments of allergic rhinitis (AR). In the context of informing the 2024 revision of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines, we plan to perform three systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the desirable and undesirable effects (i) between intranasal and oral medications for AR; (ii) between combinations of intranasal and oral medications versus nasal or oral medications alone; and (iii) among different intranasal specific medications. We will search four electronic bibliographic databases and three clinical trials databases for RCTs examining patients ≥ 12 years old with seasonal or perennial AR. Assessed outcomes will include the Total Nasal Symptom Score, the Total Ocular Symptom Score, and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. We will assess the methodological quality of included primary studies by using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. If appropriate, we will perform a pairwise random-effects meta-analysis for each pair of assessed medication classes and outcomes, as well as a network meta-analysis to assess the comparative efficacy of intranasal medications among each other. Heterogeneity will be explored by sensitivity and subgroup analyses. This set of systematic reviews will allow for a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological interventions for AR and inform recommendations in the context of the ARIA guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信