成人的听觉联想词学习:音乐经验和刺激排序的影响

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Samuel H. Cosper , Claudia Männel , Jutta L. Mueller
{"title":"成人的听觉联想词学习:音乐经验和刺激排序的影响","authors":"Samuel H. Cosper ,&nbsp;Claudia Männel ,&nbsp;Jutta L. Mueller","doi":"10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Evidence for sequential associative word learning in the auditory domain has been identified in infants, while adults have shown difficulties. To better understand which factors may facilitate adult auditory associative word learning, we assessed the role of auditory expertise as a learner-related property and stimulus order as a stimulus-related manipulation in the association of auditory objects and novel labels. We tested in the first experiment auditorily-trained musicians versus athletes (high-level control group) and in the second experiment stimulus ordering, contrasting object-label versus label-object presentation. Learning was evaluated from Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) during training and subsequent testing phases using a cluster-based permutation approach, as well as accuracy-judgement responses during test. Results revealed for musicians a late positive component in the ERP during testing, but neither an N400 (400–800 ms) nor behavioral effects were found at test, while athletes did not show any effect of learning. Moreover, the object-label-ordering group only exhibited emerging association effects during training, while the label-object-ordering group showed a trend-level late ERP effect (800–1200 ms) during test as well as above chance accuracy-judgement scores. Thus, our results suggest the learner-related property of auditory expertise and stimulus-related manipulation of stimulus ordering modulate auditory associative word learning in adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55331,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Cognition","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 106207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262624000848/pdfft?md5=8669808949d02bc1ec84c5e6321af715&pid=1-s2.0-S0278262624000848-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditory associative word learning in adults: The effects of musical experience and stimulus ordering\",\"authors\":\"Samuel H. Cosper ,&nbsp;Claudia Männel ,&nbsp;Jutta L. Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Evidence for sequential associative word learning in the auditory domain has been identified in infants, while adults have shown difficulties. To better understand which factors may facilitate adult auditory associative word learning, we assessed the role of auditory expertise as a learner-related property and stimulus order as a stimulus-related manipulation in the association of auditory objects and novel labels. We tested in the first experiment auditorily-trained musicians versus athletes (high-level control group) and in the second experiment stimulus ordering, contrasting object-label versus label-object presentation. Learning was evaluated from Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) during training and subsequent testing phases using a cluster-based permutation approach, as well as accuracy-judgement responses during test. Results revealed for musicians a late positive component in the ERP during testing, but neither an N400 (400–800 ms) nor behavioral effects were found at test, while athletes did not show any effect of learning. Moreover, the object-label-ordering group only exhibited emerging association effects during training, while the label-object-ordering group showed a trend-level late ERP effect (800–1200 ms) during test as well as above chance accuracy-judgement scores. Thus, our results suggest the learner-related property of auditory expertise and stimulus-related manipulation of stimulus ordering modulate auditory associative word learning in adults.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262624000848/pdfft?md5=8669808949d02bc1ec84c5e6321af715&pid=1-s2.0-S0278262624000848-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262624000848\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262624000848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有证据表明,婴儿可以在听觉领域进行顺序联想单词学习,而成人却很难做到。为了更好地了解哪些因素可能会促进成人听觉联想词学习,我们评估了听觉专业知识作为学习者相关属性和刺激顺序作为刺激相关操作在听觉对象和新标签联想中的作用。在第一项实验中,我们测试了受过听觉训练的音乐家与运动员(高水平对照组)的对比;在第二项实验中,我们测试了刺激顺序,即对象-标签与标签-对象的对比。在训练和随后的测试阶段,使用基于聚类的排列方法,通过事件相关电位(ERP)以及测试期间的准确性判断反应来评估学习效果。结果显示,音乐家在测试期间的 ERP 中出现了晚期阳性成分,但在测试中既没有发现 N400(400-800 毫秒),也没有发现行为效应,而运动员则没有表现出任何学习效应。此外,物体-标签-排序组仅在训练中表现出新出现的联想效应,而标签-物体-排序组在测试中表现出趋势水平的晚期ERP效应(800-1200 ms),并且准确性判断得分高于偶然水平。因此,我们的研究结果表明,与学习者相关的听觉专业知识属性和与刺激相关的刺激排序操作会调节成人的听觉联想词学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Auditory associative word learning in adults: The effects of musical experience and stimulus ordering

Evidence for sequential associative word learning in the auditory domain has been identified in infants, while adults have shown difficulties. To better understand which factors may facilitate adult auditory associative word learning, we assessed the role of auditory expertise as a learner-related property and stimulus order as a stimulus-related manipulation in the association of auditory objects and novel labels. We tested in the first experiment auditorily-trained musicians versus athletes (high-level control group) and in the second experiment stimulus ordering, contrasting object-label versus label-object presentation. Learning was evaluated from Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) during training and subsequent testing phases using a cluster-based permutation approach, as well as accuracy-judgement responses during test. Results revealed for musicians a late positive component in the ERP during testing, but neither an N400 (400–800 ms) nor behavioral effects were found at test, while athletes did not show any effect of learning. Moreover, the object-label-ordering group only exhibited emerging association effects during training, while the label-object-ordering group showed a trend-level late ERP effect (800–1200 ms) during test as well as above chance accuracy-judgement scores. Thus, our results suggest the learner-related property of auditory expertise and stimulus-related manipulation of stimulus ordering modulate auditory associative word learning in adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Cognition
Brain and Cognition 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Brain and Cognition is a forum for the integration of the neurosciences and cognitive sciences. B&C publishes peer-reviewed research articles, theoretical papers, case histories that address important theoretical issues, and historical articles into the interaction between cognitive function and brain processes. The focus is on rigorous studies of an empirical or theoretical nature and which make an original contribution to our knowledge about the involvement of the nervous system in cognition. Coverage includes, but is not limited to memory, learning, emotion, perception, movement, music or praxis in relationship to brain structure or function. Published articles will typically address issues relating some aspect of cognitive function to its neurological substrates with clear theoretical import, formulating new hypotheses or refuting previously established hypotheses. Clinical papers are welcome if they raise issues of theoretical importance or concern and shed light on the interaction between brain function and cognitive function. We welcome review articles that clearly contribute a new perspective or integration, beyond summarizing the literature in the field; authors of review articles should make explicit where the contribution lies. We also welcome proposals for special issues on aspects of the relation between cognition and the structure and function of the nervous system. Such proposals can be made directly to the Editor-in-Chief from individuals interested in being guest editors for such collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信