Rupak Singla, Amitesh Gupta, Vikas Kumar, Chandrasekaran Padmapriyadarsini, Devika Tayal, Shweta Anand, Abhishek Faye, Ak Hemanth Kumar, Madhumita Paul Choudhary
{"title":"抗结核药物血浆水平低导致临床无应答患者的风险因素和临床管理研究。","authors":"Rupak Singla, Amitesh Gupta, Vikas Kumar, Chandrasekaran Padmapriyadarsini, Devika Tayal, Shweta Anand, Abhishek Faye, Ak Hemanth Kumar, Madhumita Paul Choudhary","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was carried out to assess the role of therapeutic drug monitoring of crucial first-line anti-tubercular drugs: rifampicin (R) and isoniazid (H) among 75 non-responding proven drug-sensitive tuberculosis patients on treatment followed by intervention in field conditions. The intervention was done in the form of either an increase in the dosage of R and H in patients with minimally low drug levels or a modification of the regimen in a certain group of patients with significantly low drug levels by augmenting it with three or four second-line drugs in addition to standard first-line drugs. This study also aimed to determine the relationship between the measured plasma concentration of anti-tubercular drugs and various demographic, microbiological, radiological, and malabsorption factors and the presence of co-morbidities affecting them. The study also focused on the clinical impact of the intervention for low plasma levels of anti-TB drugs on TB treatment outcomes. In our study overall, 85.5% of patients had low levels of any drug. In 85.3% of patients, R levels were low, and in 39.1%, H levels were low. On univariate analysis, low body mass index (BMI), hypoalbuminemia, bilateral disease on chest X-rays, and the presence of cavities were found to be significantly associated with low drug levels, while none of the factors were independently significantly associated. Low BMI, pulmonary tuberculosis and disseminated tuberculosis, far-advanced disease and bilateral disease on chest X-ray, presence of cavities, and only low R levels were associated with unfavorable outcomes, with none of the factors found to be significant on multivariate analysis. In our study, it was seen that the treatment outcome was favorable in 59.6% of patients in whom this intervention was done by augmenting the treatment regimen with three/four second-line drugs along with increasing the dose of R and H. To conclude, various factors may be associated with low plasma levels of anti-tubercular drugs. If such patients show clinical non-response after >6 months of treatment and have significantly low drug levels, with an absence of drug resistance, their treatment regimen may need augmentation with three/four second-line drugs along with an increase in the dose of R and H, which may lead to a favorable outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of risk factors and clinical management of patients with clinical non-response due to low plasma levels of anti-tubercular drugs.\",\"authors\":\"Rupak Singla, Amitesh Gupta, Vikas Kumar, Chandrasekaran Padmapriyadarsini, Devika Tayal, Shweta Anand, Abhishek Faye, Ak Hemanth Kumar, Madhumita Paul Choudhary\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/monaldi.2024.3036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was carried out to assess the role of therapeutic drug monitoring of crucial first-line anti-tubercular drugs: rifampicin (R) and isoniazid (H) among 75 non-responding proven drug-sensitive tuberculosis patients on treatment followed by intervention in field conditions. The intervention was done in the form of either an increase in the dosage of R and H in patients with minimally low drug levels or a modification of the regimen in a certain group of patients with significantly low drug levels by augmenting it with three or four second-line drugs in addition to standard first-line drugs. This study also aimed to determine the relationship between the measured plasma concentration of anti-tubercular drugs and various demographic, microbiological, radiological, and malabsorption factors and the presence of co-morbidities affecting them. The study also focused on the clinical impact of the intervention for low plasma levels of anti-TB drugs on TB treatment outcomes. In our study overall, 85.5% of patients had low levels of any drug. In 85.3% of patients, R levels were low, and in 39.1%, H levels were low. On univariate analysis, low body mass index (BMI), hypoalbuminemia, bilateral disease on chest X-rays, and the presence of cavities were found to be significantly associated with low drug levels, while none of the factors were independently significantly associated. Low BMI, pulmonary tuberculosis and disseminated tuberculosis, far-advanced disease and bilateral disease on chest X-ray, presence of cavities, and only low R levels were associated with unfavorable outcomes, with none of the factors found to be significant on multivariate analysis. In our study, it was seen that the treatment outcome was favorable in 59.6% of patients in whom this intervention was done by augmenting the treatment regimen with three/four second-line drugs along with increasing the dose of R and H. To conclude, various factors may be associated with low plasma levels of anti-tubercular drugs. If such patients show clinical non-response after >6 months of treatment and have significantly low drug levels, with an absence of drug resistance, their treatment regimen may need augmentation with three/four second-line drugs along with an increase in the dose of R and H, which may lead to a favorable outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.3036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2024.3036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项研究旨在评估对 75 名经证实对药物敏感的肺结核病人进行治疗后,在实地条件下对关键的一线抗结核药物利福平(R)和异烟肼(H)进行治疗药物监测的作用。干预的形式是,对药物水平极低的患者增加 R 和 H 的用量,或对药物水平明显偏低的某组患者修改治疗方案,在标准一线药物的基础上增加三到四种二线药物。这项研究还旨在确定抗结核药物的测定血浆浓度与各种人口学、微生物学、放射学和吸收不良因素之间的关系,以及是否存在影响这些因素的并发症。研究还重点关注了抗结核药物血浆浓度过低干预措施对结核病治疗效果的临床影响。在我们的研究中,85.5%的患者任何药物的血浆浓度都偏低。85.3%的患者 R 药物水平偏低,39.1%的患者 H 药物水平偏低。通过单变量分析发现,低体重指数(BMI)、低白蛋白血症、胸部 X 射线双侧疾病和龋齿的存在与药物水平低显著相关,而这些因素都不是独立显著相关的。低体重指数、肺结核和播散性肺结核、胸部 X 光片上的远期疾病和双侧疾病、龋齿的存在以及只有低 R 水平与不利的结果有关,而在多变量分析中没有发现任何因素具有显著性。总之,抗结核药物血浆水平低可能与多种因素有关。如果这些患者在治疗超过 6 个月后仍未出现临床反应,且药物水平明显偏低,同时又不存在耐药性,则可能需要在增加 R 和 H 剂量的同时,增加三/四种二线药物的治疗方案,从而获得良好的疗效。
Study of risk factors and clinical management of patients with clinical non-response due to low plasma levels of anti-tubercular drugs.
This study was carried out to assess the role of therapeutic drug monitoring of crucial first-line anti-tubercular drugs: rifampicin (R) and isoniazid (H) among 75 non-responding proven drug-sensitive tuberculosis patients on treatment followed by intervention in field conditions. The intervention was done in the form of either an increase in the dosage of R and H in patients with minimally low drug levels or a modification of the regimen in a certain group of patients with significantly low drug levels by augmenting it with three or four second-line drugs in addition to standard first-line drugs. This study also aimed to determine the relationship between the measured plasma concentration of anti-tubercular drugs and various demographic, microbiological, radiological, and malabsorption factors and the presence of co-morbidities affecting them. The study also focused on the clinical impact of the intervention for low plasma levels of anti-TB drugs on TB treatment outcomes. In our study overall, 85.5% of patients had low levels of any drug. In 85.3% of patients, R levels were low, and in 39.1%, H levels were low. On univariate analysis, low body mass index (BMI), hypoalbuminemia, bilateral disease on chest X-rays, and the presence of cavities were found to be significantly associated with low drug levels, while none of the factors were independently significantly associated. Low BMI, pulmonary tuberculosis and disseminated tuberculosis, far-advanced disease and bilateral disease on chest X-ray, presence of cavities, and only low R levels were associated with unfavorable outcomes, with none of the factors found to be significant on multivariate analysis. In our study, it was seen that the treatment outcome was favorable in 59.6% of patients in whom this intervention was done by augmenting the treatment regimen with three/four second-line drugs along with increasing the dose of R and H. To conclude, various factors may be associated with low plasma levels of anti-tubercular drugs. If such patients show clinical non-response after >6 months of treatment and have significantly low drug levels, with an absence of drug resistance, their treatment regimen may need augmentation with three/four second-line drugs along with an increase in the dose of R and H, which may lead to a favorable outcome.