{"title":"使用 CAD/CAM 折弯机制作的舌侧固定保持器的精度。","authors":"Fu Ping Cui, Jung-Jin Park, Seong-Hun Kim","doi":"10.4041/kjod24.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lingual fixed retainers, made from 0.0175-inch 3-strand twisted stainless steel wire (TW) and 0.016 × 0.022-inch straight rectangular wire (RW), are generally used in clinical practice. This study aimed to calculate their accuracy by comparing the discrepancy between computer-aided customized retainers made from these two types of wires.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven orthodontic patients were selected, resulting in 22 maxillary and mandibular three-dimensional printing dental models. Two types of lingual fixed retainers were bonded from canine to canine. To determine the accuracy, five points were chosen for each model, resulting in 110 selected points. The absolute values of the distances on the x-, y-, and z-axes were measured to compare the accuracy of the two types of computer-aided retainers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of the two types of retainers did not differ significantly in the x- and z-axes, but only in the y-axis (<i>P</i> < 0.01), where RW-fixed retainers exhibited a slightly but significantly increased distance compared to the TW.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both types of retainers showed high accuracy; however, RW had a slight but statistically significant difference along the y-axis compared with TW. This type of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing bending machine is limited to two dimensions, and the dental arch is curved. Therefore, RW may require slight manual adjustment by the practitioner after manufacturing.</p>","PeriodicalId":51260,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"54 4","pages":"257-263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of lingual fixed retainers fabricated using a CAD/CAM bending machine.\",\"authors\":\"Fu Ping Cui, Jung-Jin Park, Seong-Hun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4041/kjod24.078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lingual fixed retainers, made from 0.0175-inch 3-strand twisted stainless steel wire (TW) and 0.016 × 0.022-inch straight rectangular wire (RW), are generally used in clinical practice. This study aimed to calculate their accuracy by comparing the discrepancy between computer-aided customized retainers made from these two types of wires.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven orthodontic patients were selected, resulting in 22 maxillary and mandibular three-dimensional printing dental models. Two types of lingual fixed retainers were bonded from canine to canine. To determine the accuracy, five points were chosen for each model, resulting in 110 selected points. The absolute values of the distances on the x-, y-, and z-axes were measured to compare the accuracy of the two types of computer-aided retainers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of the two types of retainers did not differ significantly in the x- and z-axes, but only in the y-axis (<i>P</i> < 0.01), where RW-fixed retainers exhibited a slightly but significantly increased distance compared to the TW.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both types of retainers showed high accuracy; however, RW had a slight but statistically significant difference along the y-axis compared with TW. This type of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing bending machine is limited to two dimensions, and the dental arch is curved. Therefore, RW may require slight manual adjustment by the practitioner after manufacturing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"257-263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270144/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod24.078\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod24.078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:临床上通常使用由 0.0175 英寸三股绞合不锈钢丝(TW)和 0.016 × 0.022 英寸直矩形丝(RW)制成的舌侧固定保持器。本研究旨在通过比较这两种钢丝制成的计算机辅助定制保持器之间的差异来计算其准确性:方法:选取 11 名正畸患者,制作了 22 个上颌和下颌三维打印牙科模型。从犬齿到犬齿粘接两种类型的舌侧固定保持器。为确定精确度,每个模型选取五个点,共选取 110 个点。测量 x 轴、y 轴和 z 轴上距离的绝对值,以比较两种计算机辅助固位体的准确性:结果:两种类型的保持器在 x 轴和 z 轴上的精确度没有显著差异,只有在 y 轴上有差异(P < 0.01),与 TW 相比,RW 固定保持器的距离略有增加,但幅度较大:结论:两种类型的固位体都表现出很高的准确性;但是,RW与TW相比,在Y轴上有轻微但有统计学意义的差异。这种计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造的折弯机仅限于两个维度,而牙弓是弯曲的。因此,RW 在制造后可能需要医师进行轻微的手动调整。
Accuracy of lingual fixed retainers fabricated using a CAD/CAM bending machine.
Objective: Lingual fixed retainers, made from 0.0175-inch 3-strand twisted stainless steel wire (TW) and 0.016 × 0.022-inch straight rectangular wire (RW), are generally used in clinical practice. This study aimed to calculate their accuracy by comparing the discrepancy between computer-aided customized retainers made from these two types of wires.
Methods: Eleven orthodontic patients were selected, resulting in 22 maxillary and mandibular three-dimensional printing dental models. Two types of lingual fixed retainers were bonded from canine to canine. To determine the accuracy, five points were chosen for each model, resulting in 110 selected points. The absolute values of the distances on the x-, y-, and z-axes were measured to compare the accuracy of the two types of computer-aided retainers.
Results: The accuracy of the two types of retainers did not differ significantly in the x- and z-axes, but only in the y-axis (P < 0.01), where RW-fixed retainers exhibited a slightly but significantly increased distance compared to the TW.
Conclusions: Both types of retainers showed high accuracy; however, RW had a slight but statistically significant difference along the y-axis compared with TW. This type of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing bending machine is limited to two dimensions, and the dental arch is curved. Therefore, RW may require slight manual adjustment by the practitioner after manufacturing.
期刊介绍:
The Korean Journal of Orthodontics (KJO) is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal published in January, March, May, July, September, and November each year. It was first launched in 1970 and, as the official scientific publication of Korean Association of Orthodontists, KJO aims to publish high quality clinical and scientific original research papers in all areas related to orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Specifically, its interest focuses on evidence-based investigations of contemporary diagnostic procedures and treatment techniques, expanding to significant clinical reports of diverse treatment approaches.
The scope of KJO covers all areas of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics including successful diagnostic procedures and treatment planning, growth and development of the face and its clinical implications, appliance designs, biomechanics, TMJ disorders and adult treatment. Specifically, its latest interest focuses on skeletal anchorage devices, orthodontic appliance and biomaterials, 3 dimensional imaging techniques utilized for dentofacial diagnosis and treatment planning, and orthognathic surgery to correct skeletal disharmony in association of orthodontic treatment.