晚期胸腺癌患者免疫耐受后的再挑战免疫疗法

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Clinical & Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s12094-024-03597-z
Keda Shao, Xiaohong Zeng, Yue Hao, Yanhua Wang, Chunwei Xu, Zhengbo Song
{"title":"晚期胸腺癌患者免疫耐受后的再挑战免疫疗法","authors":"Keda Shao, Xiaohong Zeng, Yue Hao, Yanhua Wang, Chunwei Xu, Zhengbo Song","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03597-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Immunotherapy is effective for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma (TC). However, the effectiveness of rechallenge immunotherapy in patients who are resistant to immunotherapy has not been investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five patients with advanced TC using immunotherapy between 2016 and 2023 at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, and Fujian Cancer Hospital were evaluated in this study. Tumor response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 patients were included in this study. The median PFS (mPFS) for all patients was 5.43 months and the median OS (mOS) was 16 months. After rechallenge immunotherapy, only three patients achieved partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 16.7%, and nine patients attained stable disease, resulting in a disease control rate of 66.7%. Patients who underwent rechallenge immunotherapy had shorter mPFS compared to chemotherapy (3.53 months vs. 6.00 months, P = 0.041). In addition, the incidence of Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in these patients was 22.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rechallenge immunotherapy has poor efficacy in immunotolerant TC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"534-541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rechallenge immunotherapy after immune resistance in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Keda Shao, Xiaohong Zeng, Yue Hao, Yanhua Wang, Chunwei Xu, Zhengbo Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12094-024-03597-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Immunotherapy is effective for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma (TC). However, the effectiveness of rechallenge immunotherapy in patients who are resistant to immunotherapy has not been investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five patients with advanced TC using immunotherapy between 2016 and 2023 at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, and Fujian Cancer Hospital were evaluated in this study. Tumor response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 patients were included in this study. The median PFS (mPFS) for all patients was 5.43 months and the median OS (mOS) was 16 months. After rechallenge immunotherapy, only three patients achieved partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 16.7%, and nine patients attained stable disease, resulting in a disease control rate of 66.7%. Patients who underwent rechallenge immunotherapy had shorter mPFS compared to chemotherapy (3.53 months vs. 6.00 months, P = 0.041). In addition, the incidence of Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in these patients was 22.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rechallenge immunotherapy has poor efficacy in immunotolerant TC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical & Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"534-541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical & Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03597-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03597-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫疗法对晚期胸腺癌(TC)患者有效。然而,对于免疫治疗耐药的患者,重新挑战免疫治疗的有效性尚未得到研究:本研究评估了浙江省肿瘤医院、南昌大学附属第二医院和福建省肿瘤医院在2016年至2023年间使用免疫疗法的35例晚期TC患者。肿瘤反应根据实体瘤反应评估标准1.1版进行评估。无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)采用Kaplan-Meier法计算:本研究共纳入 35 例患者。所有患者的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为5.43个月,中位总生存期(mOS)为16个月。接受再挑战免疫疗法后,只有 3 名患者获得部分应答,总应答率为 16.7%,9 名患者病情稳定,疾病控制率为 66.7%。与化疗相比,接受再挑战免疫疗法的患者的 mPFS 较短(3.53 个月对 6.00 个月,P = 0.041)。此外,这些患者中3-4级治疗相关不良事件的发生率为22.2%:结论:再挑战免疫疗法对免疫耐受TC患者疗效不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Rechallenge immunotherapy after immune resistance in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma.

Rechallenge immunotherapy after immune resistance in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma.

Backgrounds: Immunotherapy is effective for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma (TC). However, the effectiveness of rechallenge immunotherapy in patients who are resistant to immunotherapy has not been investigated.

Methods: Thirty-five patients with advanced TC using immunotherapy between 2016 and 2023 at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, and Fujian Cancer Hospital were evaluated in this study. Tumor response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: A total of 35 patients were included in this study. The median PFS (mPFS) for all patients was 5.43 months and the median OS (mOS) was 16 months. After rechallenge immunotherapy, only three patients achieved partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 16.7%, and nine patients attained stable disease, resulting in a disease control rate of 66.7%. Patients who underwent rechallenge immunotherapy had shorter mPFS compared to chemotherapy (3.53 months vs. 6.00 months, P = 0.041). In addition, the incidence of Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in these patients was 22.2%.

Conclusion: Rechallenge immunotherapy has poor efficacy in immunotolerant TC patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Oncology is an international journal devoted to fostering interaction between experimental and clinical oncology. It covers all aspects of research on cancer, from the more basic discoveries dealing with both cell and molecular biology of tumour cells, to the most advanced clinical assays of conventional and new drugs. In addition, the journal has a strong commitment to facilitating the transfer of knowledge from the basic laboratory to the clinical practice, with the publication of educational series devoted to closing the gap between molecular and clinical oncologists. Molecular biology of tumours, identification of new targets for cancer therapy, and new technologies for research and treatment of cancer are the major themes covered by the educational series. Full research articles on a broad spectrum of subjects, including the molecular and cellular bases of disease, aetiology, pathophysiology, pathology, epidemiology, clinical features, and the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信