人奶瓶与社区环境中婴幼儿测试体重的比较。

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Anita L Esquerra-Zwiers, Madeline Heter, Anastasia Perecki, Olivia Jackson, D Addam Jongekryg, Brian Yurk
{"title":"人奶瓶与社区环境中婴幼儿测试体重的比较。","authors":"Anita L Esquerra-Zwiers, Madeline Heter, Anastasia Perecki, Olivia Jackson, D Addam Jongekryg, Brian Yurk","doi":"10.1186/s40795-024-00911-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accuracy of infant intake using test weights (TWs), the change in weight before and after an infant feeds, has only been validated in hospitalized premature infants. This study's primary aim was to identify how accurate parent infants/toddler (< 2 years old) TWs are at measuring infant intake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 101 paired bottle and infant/toddler TWs with 31 participants. Parents participated in the feeding sessions by completing infant/toddler TWs blinded to the researcher. Research assistants completed human milk bottle TWs. Infants were fed previously expressed human milk, initially 30 g, but volumes were increased to not exceed the scale's capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference between the bottle TWs measured using the Tanita and OHAUS scales was not significantly different from zero (95% CI (Tanita - OHAUS): (-0.251, 0.108) g). The mean difference between infant/toddler and bottle TWs was significantly different from 0 (95% CI (infant-bottle): (-3.45, -0.915 g or -3.57, -0.95 mL). Infant/toddler and bottle TWs were in agreement with a difference of 2.18 g (SD = 6.63) or 2.25 mL within the scale stated accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Tanita infant digital scale accurately measures bottle TWs. The differences in parent infant/toddler TWs are within a clinically acceptable range.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"10 1","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of human milk bottle with infant/toddler test weights in the community setting.\",\"authors\":\"Anita L Esquerra-Zwiers, Madeline Heter, Anastasia Perecki, Olivia Jackson, D Addam Jongekryg, Brian Yurk\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40795-024-00911-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accuracy of infant intake using test weights (TWs), the change in weight before and after an infant feeds, has only been validated in hospitalized premature infants. This study's primary aim was to identify how accurate parent infants/toddler (< 2 years old) TWs are at measuring infant intake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 101 paired bottle and infant/toddler TWs with 31 participants. Parents participated in the feeding sessions by completing infant/toddler TWs blinded to the researcher. Research assistants completed human milk bottle TWs. Infants were fed previously expressed human milk, initially 30 g, but volumes were increased to not exceed the scale's capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference between the bottle TWs measured using the Tanita and OHAUS scales was not significantly different from zero (95% CI (Tanita - OHAUS): (-0.251, 0.108) g). The mean difference between infant/toddler and bottle TWs was significantly different from 0 (95% CI (infant-bottle): (-3.45, -0.915 g or -3.57, -0.95 mL). Infant/toddler and bottle TWs were in agreement with a difference of 2.18 g (SD = 6.63) or 2.25 mL within the scale stated accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Tanita infant digital scale accurately measures bottle TWs. The differences in parent infant/toddler TWs are within a clinically acceptable range.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270915/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00911-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00911-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用测试体重(TWs)(即婴儿进食前后的体重变化)来测定婴儿摄入量的准确性仅在住院早产儿中得到过验证。本研究的主要目的是确定父母婴儿/学步期婴儿(方法:从 101 个配对的奶瓶和学步期婴儿中收集数据:从 101 个配对奶瓶和婴儿/学步期 TW 中收集数据,共有 31 人参与。参加喂养课程的父母在研究人员的盲法监护下完成婴儿/学步儿童 TWs。研究助理完成人奶瓶 TW。给婴儿喂食的是之前表达过的人奶,最初为 30 克,但奶量不断增加,以不超过量表的容量:使用 Tanita 和奥豪斯量表测量的奶瓶 TW 平均值与零无显著差异(95% CI (Tanita - OHAUS):(-0.251, 0.108) g)。婴儿/学步儿童和奶瓶 TWs 之间的平均差异与 0 有显著差异(95% CI(婴儿-奶瓶):(-3.45,-0.10 克):(-3.45, -0.915 g 或 -3.57, -0.95 mL)。婴儿/学步期宝宝和奶瓶的总重量一致,差值为2.18克(SD = 6.63)或2.25毫升,在衡器规定的准确度范围内:结论:谷田婴儿电子秤能准确测量奶瓶TW值。结论:谷田婴儿电子秤能准确测量奶瓶重量,父母婴儿/学步儿童的奶瓶重量差异在临床可接受的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of human milk bottle with infant/toddler test weights in the community setting.

Background: The accuracy of infant intake using test weights (TWs), the change in weight before and after an infant feeds, has only been validated in hospitalized premature infants. This study's primary aim was to identify how accurate parent infants/toddler (< 2 years old) TWs are at measuring infant intake.

Methods: Data were collected from 101 paired bottle and infant/toddler TWs with 31 participants. Parents participated in the feeding sessions by completing infant/toddler TWs blinded to the researcher. Research assistants completed human milk bottle TWs. Infants were fed previously expressed human milk, initially 30 g, but volumes were increased to not exceed the scale's capacity.

Results: The mean difference between the bottle TWs measured using the Tanita and OHAUS scales was not significantly different from zero (95% CI (Tanita - OHAUS): (-0.251, 0.108) g). The mean difference between infant/toddler and bottle TWs was significantly different from 0 (95% CI (infant-bottle): (-3.45, -0.915 g or -3.57, -0.95 mL). Infant/toddler and bottle TWs were in agreement with a difference of 2.18 g (SD = 6.63) or 2.25 mL within the scale stated accuracy.

Conclusions: The Tanita infant digital scale accurately measures bottle TWs. The differences in parent infant/toddler TWs are within a clinically acceptable range.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信