Payush Chatta, Brian Diep, Jakrin Kewcharoen, Daniel Rossie, Cory Toomasian, Purvi Parwani, Dmitry Abramov
{"title":"抗凝患者的计算机断层扫描肺血管造影诊断率。","authors":"Payush Chatta, Brian Diep, Jakrin Kewcharoen, Daniel Rossie, Cory Toomasian, Purvi Parwani, Dmitry Abramov","doi":"10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients who present to the emergency department (ED) for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) are often on active oral anticoagulation (AC). However, the diagnostic yield of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in screening for PE in patients who present on AC has not been well characterized. We aim to investigate the diagnostic yield of CTPA in diagnosing PE depending on AC status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed and analyzed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent CTPA for PE at a university hospital ED from June 1, 2019, to March 25, 2022. Primary outcome was the incidence of PE on CTPA depending on baseline AC status and indication for AC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,846 patients, 242 were on AC for a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), 210 were on AC for other indications, and 2,394 were not on AC. The incidence of PE on CTPA was significantly lower in patients on AC for other indications (5.7%) when compared to patients on AC for prior VTE (24.3%) and patients not on AC at presentation (9.8%) (<i>P</i><0.001). In multivariable analysis among the whole cohort, AC was associated with a positive CTPA (odds ratio [<i>OR</i>] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [<i>CI</i>]: 0.15-0.45, <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of PE among patients undergoing CTPA in the ED is lower in patients previously on AC for indications other than VTE when compared to those not on AC or those on AC for history of VTE. AC status and indication for AC may affect pre-test probability of a positive CTPA, and AC status therefore warrants consideration as part of future diagnostic algorithms among patients with suspected PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":23685,"journal":{"name":"World journal of emergency medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic yield for computed tomography pulmonary angiography in patients with anticoagulation.\",\"authors\":\"Payush Chatta, Brian Diep, Jakrin Kewcharoen, Daniel Rossie, Cory Toomasian, Purvi Parwani, Dmitry Abramov\",\"doi\":\"10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients who present to the emergency department (ED) for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) are often on active oral anticoagulation (AC). However, the diagnostic yield of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in screening for PE in patients who present on AC has not been well characterized. We aim to investigate the diagnostic yield of CTPA in diagnosing PE depending on AC status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed and analyzed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent CTPA for PE at a university hospital ED from June 1, 2019, to March 25, 2022. Primary outcome was the incidence of PE on CTPA depending on baseline AC status and indication for AC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,846 patients, 242 were on AC for a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), 210 were on AC for other indications, and 2,394 were not on AC. The incidence of PE on CTPA was significantly lower in patients on AC for other indications (5.7%) when compared to patients on AC for prior VTE (24.3%) and patients not on AC at presentation (9.8%) (<i>P</i><0.001). In multivariable analysis among the whole cohort, AC was associated with a positive CTPA (odds ratio [<i>OR</i>] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [<i>CI</i>]: 0.15-0.45, <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of PE among patients undergoing CTPA in the ED is lower in patients previously on AC for indications other than VTE when compared to those not on AC or those on AC for history of VTE. AC status and indication for AC may affect pre-test probability of a positive CTPA, and AC status therefore warrants consideration as part of future diagnostic algorithms among patients with suspected PE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of emergency medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265635/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.042\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:因疑似肺栓塞(PE)而到急诊科(ED)就诊的患者通常都在服用积极的口服抗凝药(AC)。然而,计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影术(CTPA)在筛查服用抗凝药患者肺栓塞方面的诊断率还没有得到很好的描述。我们旨在研究 CTPA 诊断 PE 的诊断率取决于 AC 状态:我们回顾并分析了一家大学医院急诊室自 2019 年 6 月 1 日至 2022 年 3 月 25 日期间因 PE 而接受 CTPA 患者的电子病历。主要结果是根据基线 AC 状态和 AC 适应症的 CTPA PE 发生率:在2846名患者中,242名患者因静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)病史而接受AC治疗,210名患者因其他适应症而接受AC治疗,2394名患者未接受AC治疗。与因既往 VTE 而使用 AC 的患者(24.3%)和就诊时未使用 AC 的患者(9.8%)相比,因其他适应症而使用 AC 的患者 CTPA PE 发生率(5.7%)明显较低(POR]0.26,95% 置信区间)。0.26,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.15-0.45,PC结论:与未使用 AC 或因 VTE 病史使用 AC 的患者相比,因 VTE 以外的适应症而使用 AC 的患者在急诊室接受 CTPA 的 PE 发生率较低。AC 状态和 AC 适应症可能会影响 CTPA 阳性的检测前概率,因此 AC 状态值得作为疑似 PE 患者未来诊断算法的一部分加以考虑。
The diagnostic yield for computed tomography pulmonary angiography in patients with anticoagulation.
Background: Patients who present to the emergency department (ED) for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) are often on active oral anticoagulation (AC). However, the diagnostic yield of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in screening for PE in patients who present on AC has not been well characterized. We aim to investigate the diagnostic yield of CTPA in diagnosing PE depending on AC status.
Methods: We reviewed and analyzed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent CTPA for PE at a university hospital ED from June 1, 2019, to March 25, 2022. Primary outcome was the incidence of PE on CTPA depending on baseline AC status and indication for AC.
Results: Of 2,846 patients, 242 were on AC for a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), 210 were on AC for other indications, and 2,394 were not on AC. The incidence of PE on CTPA was significantly lower in patients on AC for other indications (5.7%) when compared to patients on AC for prior VTE (24.3%) and patients not on AC at presentation (9.8%) (P<0.001). In multivariable analysis among the whole cohort, AC was associated with a positive CTPA (odds ratio [OR] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.45, P<0.001).
Conclusion: The incidence of PE among patients undergoing CTPA in the ED is lower in patients previously on AC for indications other than VTE when compared to those not on AC or those on AC for history of VTE. AC status and indication for AC may affect pre-test probability of a positive CTPA, and AC status therefore warrants consideration as part of future diagnostic algorithms among patients with suspected PE.
期刊介绍:
The journal will cover technical, clinical and bioengineering studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of emergency medicine, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, acute injury, out-of-hospital emergency medical service, intensive care, injury and disease prevention, disaster management, healthy policy and ethics, toxicology, and sudden illness, including cardiology, internal medicine, anesthesiology, orthopedics, and trauma care, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review questions, and more. Editorials and communications to the editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with emergency medicine.