使用新型三维(3D)打印器械清除肠袋珠子的技术。

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1111/vsu.14141
Guillermo C Cardona, Linda A Dahlgren, Christopher R Byron, Harold C McKenzie, Stephen R Werre, Sophie H Bogers
{"title":"使用新型三维(3D)打印器械清除肠袋珠子的技术。","authors":"Guillermo C Cardona, Linda A Dahlgren, Christopher R Byron, Harold C McKenzie, Stephen R Werre, Sophie H Bogers","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to determine if a three-dimensional (3D)-printed instrument technique would improve lavage removal of plastic beads (guttural pouch [GP] chondroid mimics) through a dorsal pharyngeal recess (DPR) fenestration. We hypothesized that using a 3D-printed instrument placed through the DPR fenestration would remove more beads, reduce lavage time and incur less soft tissue damage than using a lavage tube control or instrument placement through the salpingopharyngeal ostium (SPO).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Experimental cadaveric study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>A total of 30 cadaveric equine heads.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DPR fenestration was performed using transendoscopic laser and 50 plastic 12 mm beads were placed into one GP of horse heads. Four removal procedures using a 3D-printed instrument or lavage tube control placed through the DPR fenestration or the SPO were compared. Number of beads removed and number of 2-min lavage cycles to recover ≥96% of beads or three consecutive no-yield cycles were recorded. Endoscopic soft tissue damage was graded. Data were compared by generalized estimating equations (GEE) model and Fisher's exact test (p < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More beads (median 48 beads; range 0-49) were removed faster (median 24 beads/cycle; range 12-50) using the 3D-printed instrument compared to control (median 6 beads; range 0-29, 0.66 beads/cycle, range 0-49). There was no difference between total beads removed or removal speed between placement sites. There was no difference in soft tissue damage between procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our 3D-printed instrument enabled efficient plastic bead removal.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>DPR fenestration and use of our 3D-printed instrument represents an alternative to current chondroid removal techniques, warranting investigation in clinical cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1219-1230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technique for guttural pouch bead removal using a novel three-dimensional (3D)-printed instrument.\",\"authors\":\"Guillermo C Cardona, Linda A Dahlgren, Christopher R Byron, Harold C McKenzie, Stephen R Werre, Sophie H Bogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vsu.14141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to determine if a three-dimensional (3D)-printed instrument technique would improve lavage removal of plastic beads (guttural pouch [GP] chondroid mimics) through a dorsal pharyngeal recess (DPR) fenestration. We hypothesized that using a 3D-printed instrument placed through the DPR fenestration would remove more beads, reduce lavage time and incur less soft tissue damage than using a lavage tube control or instrument placement through the salpingopharyngeal ostium (SPO).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Experimental cadaveric study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>A total of 30 cadaveric equine heads.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DPR fenestration was performed using transendoscopic laser and 50 plastic 12 mm beads were placed into one GP of horse heads. Four removal procedures using a 3D-printed instrument or lavage tube control placed through the DPR fenestration or the SPO were compared. Number of beads removed and number of 2-min lavage cycles to recover ≥96% of beads or three consecutive no-yield cycles were recorded. Endoscopic soft tissue damage was graded. Data were compared by generalized estimating equations (GEE) model and Fisher's exact test (p < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More beads (median 48 beads; range 0-49) were removed faster (median 24 beads/cycle; range 12-50) using the 3D-printed instrument compared to control (median 6 beads; range 0-29, 0.66 beads/cycle, range 0-49). There was no difference between total beads removed or removal speed between placement sites. There was no difference in soft tissue damage between procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our 3D-printed instrument enabled efficient plastic bead removal.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>DPR fenestration and use of our 3D-printed instrument represents an alternative to current chondroid removal techniques, warranting investigation in clinical cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1219-1230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14141\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究的目的是确定三维(3D)打印器械技术是否能改善通过咽背凹(DPR)栅栏对塑料珠(仿胃囊软骨)的灌洗清除效果。我们假设,与使用灌洗管控制或通过咽喉骨膜(SPO)置入器械相比,通过 DPR 开孔置入 3D 打印器械可以取出更多的珠子、缩短灌洗时间并减少软组织损伤:研究设计:尸体实验研究:研究设计:实验性尸体研究:方法:使用经内窥镜激光进行 DPR 开孔,并将 50 个 12 毫米塑料珠放入马头的一个 GP 中。比较了使用 3D 打印器械或通过 DPR 开孔或 SPO 置入的灌洗管控制的四种移除程序。记录了取出的珠子数量和回收≥96%珠子的 2 分钟灌洗循环次数或连续三次无产率循环次数。对内镜下软组织损伤进行分级。通过广义估计方程(GEE)模型和费雪精确检验(P 结果)对数据进行比较:与对照组(中位数为 6 个珠子;范围为 0-29,0.66 个珠子/周期,范围为 0-49)相比,使用 3D 打印器械能更快地取出更多珠子(中位数为 48 个珠子;范围为 0-49)(中位数为 24 个珠子/周期;范围为 12-50)。不同置放部位的微珠移除总量和移除速度没有差异。结论:结论:我们的 3D 打印器械能高效去除塑料微珠:临床意义:DPR开孔和使用我们的3D打印器械是目前软骨取出技术的一种替代方法,值得在临床病例中进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technique for guttural pouch bead removal using a novel three-dimensional (3D)-printed instrument.

Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine if a three-dimensional (3D)-printed instrument technique would improve lavage removal of plastic beads (guttural pouch [GP] chondroid mimics) through a dorsal pharyngeal recess (DPR) fenestration. We hypothesized that using a 3D-printed instrument placed through the DPR fenestration would remove more beads, reduce lavage time and incur less soft tissue damage than using a lavage tube control or instrument placement through the salpingopharyngeal ostium (SPO).

Study design: Experimental cadaveric study.

Sample population: A total of 30 cadaveric equine heads.

Methods: DPR fenestration was performed using transendoscopic laser and 50 plastic 12 mm beads were placed into one GP of horse heads. Four removal procedures using a 3D-printed instrument or lavage tube control placed through the DPR fenestration or the SPO were compared. Number of beads removed and number of 2-min lavage cycles to recover ≥96% of beads or three consecutive no-yield cycles were recorded. Endoscopic soft tissue damage was graded. Data were compared by generalized estimating equations (GEE) model and Fisher's exact test (p < .05).

Results: More beads (median 48 beads; range 0-49) were removed faster (median 24 beads/cycle; range 12-50) using the 3D-printed instrument compared to control (median 6 beads; range 0-29, 0.66 beads/cycle, range 0-49). There was no difference between total beads removed or removal speed between placement sites. There was no difference in soft tissue damage between procedures.

Conclusion: Our 3D-printed instrument enabled efficient plastic bead removal.

Clinical significance: DPR fenestration and use of our 3D-printed instrument represents an alternative to current chondroid removal techniques, warranting investigation in clinical cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信