{"title":"一项随机前瞻性研究,比较低容量肠道制剂在中国结肠镜检查准备中的效果。","authors":"Jianwei Shen, Hong Sheng, Hui He, Changbo Sun, Xufeng Han, Xianjie Zhu, Chunwei Wang, Ruiwei Shen, Qunqun Ye, Xiaogang Yuan, Qiang Zhao, Nuonan Yang, Jiaqi Wang, Ting Lu, Dahua Chen, Dawei Chen, Jieqiong Lin, Xiaona Shao","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2383276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) and 3 L split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) with or without dimethicone on bowel preparation before colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted from April 2021 to December 2021, consecutive adult patients scheduled for colonoscopy were prospectively randomized into four groups: SPMC, SPMC plus dimethicone, 3 L PEG, and 3 L PEG plus dimethicone. Primary endpoint was colon cleansing based on Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary endpoints were bubble score, time to cecal intubation, adenoma detection rate (ADR), patient safety and compliance, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 223 and 291 patients in SPMC and 3 L PEG group, respectively. The proportion with acceptable bowel cleansing, total BBPS score and cecal intubation time were similar in all four subgroups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Patient-reported acceptability and tolerability was significantly greater in SPMC than 3 L PEG group (<i>p</i> < 0.001); adverse events were significantly lower in SPMC than latter group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). ADR in both groups was greater than 30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPMC had significantly higher acceptability and tolerability than 3 L PEG, however, was similar in terms of bowel-cleansing effect and cecal intubation time and hence can be used before colonoscopy preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1112-1119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized prospective study comparing the effect of low-volume bowel preparations for colonoscopy preparation in China.\",\"authors\":\"Jianwei Shen, Hong Sheng, Hui He, Changbo Sun, Xufeng Han, Xianjie Zhu, Chunwei Wang, Ruiwei Shen, Qunqun Ye, Xiaogang Yuan, Qiang Zhao, Nuonan Yang, Jiaqi Wang, Ting Lu, Dahua Chen, Dawei Chen, Jieqiong Lin, Xiaona Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365521.2024.2383276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) and 3 L split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) with or without dimethicone on bowel preparation before colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted from April 2021 to December 2021, consecutive adult patients scheduled for colonoscopy were prospectively randomized into four groups: SPMC, SPMC plus dimethicone, 3 L PEG, and 3 L PEG plus dimethicone. Primary endpoint was colon cleansing based on Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary endpoints were bubble score, time to cecal intubation, adenoma detection rate (ADR), patient safety and compliance, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 223 and 291 patients in SPMC and 3 L PEG group, respectively. The proportion with acceptable bowel cleansing, total BBPS score and cecal intubation time were similar in all four subgroups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Patient-reported acceptability and tolerability was significantly greater in SPMC than 3 L PEG group (<i>p</i> < 0.001); adverse events were significantly lower in SPMC than latter group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). ADR in both groups was greater than 30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPMC had significantly higher acceptability and tolerability than 3 L PEG, however, was similar in terms of bowel-cleansing effect and cecal intubation time and hence can be used before colonoscopy preparation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1112-1119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2383276\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2383276","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估皮磷酸钠/枸橼酸镁(SPMC)和3升分剂量聚乙二醇(PEG)加或不加二甲基硅氧烷对结肠镜检查前肠道准备的影响:在这项于2021年4月至2021年12月进行的多中心、前瞻性、随机对照研究中,预定接受结肠镜检查的连续成年患者被前瞻性地随机分为四组:SPMC组、SPMC加二甲基硅氧烷组、3升PEG组和3升PEG加二甲基硅氧烷组。主要终点是根据波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)得出的结肠清洁度。次要终点为气泡评分、盲肠插管时间、腺瘤检出率(ADR)、患者安全性和依从性以及不良事件:SPMC 组和 3 L PEG 组分别有 223 名和 291 名患者。四个亚组中可接受肠道清洁的比例、BBPS 总分和盲肠插管时间相似(P > 0.05)。患者报告的可接受性和耐受性方面,SPMC 组明显高于 3 L PEG 组(p p 结论:SPMC 组的可接受性和耐受性明显高于 3 L PEG 组:SPMC 的可接受性和耐受性明显高于 3 L PEG,但在肠道清洁效果和盲肠插管时间方面相似,因此可用于结肠镜检查前的准备工作。
A randomized prospective study comparing the effect of low-volume bowel preparations for colonoscopy preparation in China.
Aim: To evaluate the effect of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) and 3 L split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) with or without dimethicone on bowel preparation before colonoscopy.
Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted from April 2021 to December 2021, consecutive adult patients scheduled for colonoscopy were prospectively randomized into four groups: SPMC, SPMC plus dimethicone, 3 L PEG, and 3 L PEG plus dimethicone. Primary endpoint was colon cleansing based on Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary endpoints were bubble score, time to cecal intubation, adenoma detection rate (ADR), patient safety and compliance, and adverse events.
Results: We enrolled 223 and 291 patients in SPMC and 3 L PEG group, respectively. The proportion with acceptable bowel cleansing, total BBPS score and cecal intubation time were similar in all four subgroups (p > 0.05). Patient-reported acceptability and tolerability was significantly greater in SPMC than 3 L PEG group (p < 0.001); adverse events were significantly lower in SPMC than latter group (p < 0.001). ADR in both groups was greater than 30%.
Conclusion: SPMC had significantly higher acceptability and tolerability than 3 L PEG, however, was similar in terms of bowel-cleansing effect and cecal intubation time and hence can be used before colonoscopy preparation.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution