为未分化型搏动性耳鸣制定诊断成像算法。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004254
Caitlin Cavarocchi, Kevin Wong, Austin C Cao, Tiffany P Hwa, Alexandra E Quimby, Steven J Eliades, Michael J Ruckenstein, Douglas C Bigelow, Omar A Choudhri, Jason A Brant
{"title":"为未分化型搏动性耳鸣制定诊断成像算法。","authors":"Caitlin Cavarocchi, Kevin Wong, Austin C Cao, Tiffany P Hwa, Alexandra E Quimby, Steven J Eliades, Michael J Ruckenstein, Douglas C Bigelow, Omar A Choudhri, Jason A Brant","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Decisions around the diagnostic evaluation for pulsatile tinnitus (PT) remain challenging. We describe the usage patterns and diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities and propose an evidence-based diagnostic approach for undifferentiated PT.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single otology/neurotology clinic.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Patients with PT presenting between 2009 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic yield, and diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 315 subjects met inclusion criteria (74% female, mean ± SD age = 52 ± 17 years). Subjects were divided into four cohorts based on exam findings: normal (n = 229), venous cohort (n = 34), arterial cohort (n = 16), and outer/middle ear pathology cohort (n = 40). In total, 53% of patients received a nonidiopathic diagnosis for PT. The most common identifiable cause was sigmoid sinus dehiscence (78%) in the venous cohort, carotid stenosis (36%) in the arterial cohort, and glomus tumor (56%) in the outer/middle ear pathology cohort. There was a higher diagnostic rate among patients with positive exam findings compared to those with unrevealing exams ( p = 0.04). Imaging studies with the highest diagnostic yield were computed tomography (CT) venography (44%), formal angiography (42%), and magnetic resonance venography (40%); studies with the highest specificity were formal angiography (0.82), CT angiography (0.67), and CT venography (0.67). A diagnostic algorithm is proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reaching a diagnosis in patients with PT requires a systematic approach, taking into account both clinical and radiographic information. Physical examination is a key first step for differentiating patients into venous, arterial, and other cohorts to narrow down the likely pathology and determine which radiographic studies have the highest yield and accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Diagnostic Imaging Algorithm for Undifferentiated Pulsatile Tinnitus.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin Cavarocchi, Kevin Wong, Austin C Cao, Tiffany P Hwa, Alexandra E Quimby, Steven J Eliades, Michael J Ruckenstein, Douglas C Bigelow, Omar A Choudhri, Jason A Brant\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Decisions around the diagnostic evaluation for pulsatile tinnitus (PT) remain challenging. We describe the usage patterns and diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities and propose an evidence-based diagnostic approach for undifferentiated PT.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single otology/neurotology clinic.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Patients with PT presenting between 2009 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic yield, and diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 315 subjects met inclusion criteria (74% female, mean ± SD age = 52 ± 17 years). Subjects were divided into four cohorts based on exam findings: normal (n = 229), venous cohort (n = 34), arterial cohort (n = 16), and outer/middle ear pathology cohort (n = 40). In total, 53% of patients received a nonidiopathic diagnosis for PT. The most common identifiable cause was sigmoid sinus dehiscence (78%) in the venous cohort, carotid stenosis (36%) in the arterial cohort, and glomus tumor (56%) in the outer/middle ear pathology cohort. There was a higher diagnostic rate among patients with positive exam findings compared to those with unrevealing exams ( p = 0.04). Imaging studies with the highest diagnostic yield were computed tomography (CT) venography (44%), formal angiography (42%), and magnetic resonance venography (40%); studies with the highest specificity were formal angiography (0.82), CT angiography (0.67), and CT venography (0.67). A diagnostic algorithm is proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reaching a diagnosis in patients with PT requires a systematic approach, taking into account both clinical and radiographic information. Physical examination is a key first step for differentiating patients into venous, arterial, and other cohorts to narrow down the likely pathology and determine which radiographic studies have the highest yield and accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004254\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004254","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:围绕搏动性耳鸣(PT)诊断评估的决策仍具有挑战性。我们描述了成像方式的使用模式和诊断准确性,并提出了一种基于证据的未分化搏动性耳鸣诊断方法:研究设计:回顾性:研究对象:2009 年至 2010 年期间就诊的 PT 患者:主要结果测量:主要结果指标:敏感性、特异性、诊断率和诊断准确性:共有 315 名受试者符合纳入标准(74% 为女性,平均 ± SD 年龄 = 52 ± 17 岁)。根据检查结果将受试者分为四组:正常组(229 人)、静脉组(34 人)、动脉组(16 人)和外耳/中耳病变组(40 人)。总共有 53% 的患者被诊断为非病因性 PT。最常见的可确定病因是静脉组中的乙状窦开裂(78%)、动脉组中的颈动脉狭窄(36%)和外耳/中耳病理组中的神经胶质瘤(56%)。与检查结果不明确的患者相比,检查结果呈阳性的患者诊断率更高(P = 0.04)。诊断率最高的成像检查是计算机断层扫描(CT)静脉造影(44%)、正规血管造影(42%)和磁共振静脉造影(40%);特异性最高的检查是正规血管造影(0.82)、CT 血管造影(0.67)和 CT 静脉造影(0.67)。本文提出了一种诊断算法:结论:PT 患者的诊断需要系统的方法,同时考虑临床和放射学信息。体格检查是关键的第一步,可将患者区分为静脉、动脉和其他组群,从而缩小可能的病理范围,并确定哪些放射学检查具有最高的收益和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a Diagnostic Imaging Algorithm for Undifferentiated Pulsatile Tinnitus.

Objective: Decisions around the diagnostic evaluation for pulsatile tinnitus (PT) remain challenging. We describe the usage patterns and diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities and propose an evidence-based diagnostic approach for undifferentiated PT.

Study design: Retrospective.

Setting: Single otology/neurotology clinic.

Subjects: Patients with PT presenting between 2009 and 2020.

Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic yield, and diagnostic accuracy.

Results: A total of 315 subjects met inclusion criteria (74% female, mean ± SD age = 52 ± 17 years). Subjects were divided into four cohorts based on exam findings: normal (n = 229), venous cohort (n = 34), arterial cohort (n = 16), and outer/middle ear pathology cohort (n = 40). In total, 53% of patients received a nonidiopathic diagnosis for PT. The most common identifiable cause was sigmoid sinus dehiscence (78%) in the venous cohort, carotid stenosis (36%) in the arterial cohort, and glomus tumor (56%) in the outer/middle ear pathology cohort. There was a higher diagnostic rate among patients with positive exam findings compared to those with unrevealing exams ( p = 0.04). Imaging studies with the highest diagnostic yield were computed tomography (CT) venography (44%), formal angiography (42%), and magnetic resonance venography (40%); studies with the highest specificity were formal angiography (0.82), CT angiography (0.67), and CT venography (0.67). A diagnostic algorithm is proposed.

Conclusions: Reaching a diagnosis in patients with PT requires a systematic approach, taking into account both clinical and radiographic information. Physical examination is a key first step for differentiating patients into venous, arterial, and other cohorts to narrow down the likely pathology and determine which radiographic studies have the highest yield and accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信