人工耳蜗植入手术期间蜗内耳蜗电图随机对照试验中振幅参数对听力保护的预测作用

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004286
Michael S Harris, Kanth Koka, Adam Thompson-Harvey, Erin Harvey, William J Riggs, Shaza Saleh, Jordan T Holder, Robert T Dwyer, Sandra M Prentiss, Shannon M Lefler, Kristin Kozlowski, Meghan M Hiss, Amanda J Ortmann, Erin R Nelson-Bakkum, Andreas Büchner, Rolf Salcher, Steven A Harvey, Michael E Hoffer, Jorge E Bohorquez, Farid Alzhrani, Rana Alshihri, Fida Almuhawas, Christopher J Danner, David R Friedland, Michael D Seidman, Thomas Lenarz, Fred F Telischi, Robert F Labadie, Craig A Buchman, Oliver F Adunka
{"title":"人工耳蜗植入手术期间蜗内耳蜗电图随机对照试验中振幅参数对听力保护的预测作用","authors":"Michael S Harris, Kanth Koka, Adam Thompson-Harvey, Erin Harvey, William J Riggs, Shaza Saleh, Jordan T Holder, Robert T Dwyer, Sandra M Prentiss, Shannon M Lefler, Kristin Kozlowski, Meghan M Hiss, Amanda J Ortmann, Erin R Nelson-Bakkum, Andreas Büchner, Rolf Salcher, Steven A Harvey, Michael E Hoffer, Jorge E Bohorquez, Farid Alzhrani, Rana Alshihri, Fida Almuhawas, Christopher J Danner, David R Friedland, Michael D Seidman, Thomas Lenarz, Fred F Telischi, Robert F Labadie, Craig A Buchman, Oliver F Adunka","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To prospectively evaluate the association between hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CI) and intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) amplitude parameters.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Multi-institutional, prospective randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ten high-volume, tertiary care CI centers.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults (n = 87) with sensorineural hearing loss meeting CI criteria (2018-2021) with audiometric thresholds of ≤80 dB HL at 500 Hz.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomized to CI surgery with or without audible ECochG monitoring. Electrode arrays were inserted to the full-depth marker. Hearing preservation was determined by comparing pre-CI, unaided low-frequency (125-, 250-, and 500-Hz) pure-tone average (LF-PTA) to LF-PTA at CI activation. Three ECochG amplitude parameters were analyzed: 1) insertion track patterns, 2) magnitude of ECochG amplitude change, and 3) total number of ECochG amplitude drops.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Type CC insertion track pattern, representing corrected drops in ECochG amplitude, was seen in 76% of cases with ECochG \"on,\" compared with 24% of cases with ECochG \"off\" ( p = 0.003). The magnitude of ECochG signal drop was significantly correlated with the amount of LF-PTA change pre-CI and post-CI ( p < 0.05). The mean number of amplitude drops during electrode insertion was significantly correlated with change in LF-PTA at activation and 3 months post-CI ( p ≤ 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECochG amplitude parameters during CI surgery have important prognostic utility. Higher incidence of Type CC in ECochG \"on\" suggests that monitoring may be useful for surgeons in order to recover the ECochG signal and preventing potentially traumatic electrode-cochlear interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amplitude Parameters Are Predictive of Hearing Preservation in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implant Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Michael S Harris, Kanth Koka, Adam Thompson-Harvey, Erin Harvey, William J Riggs, Shaza Saleh, Jordan T Holder, Robert T Dwyer, Sandra M Prentiss, Shannon M Lefler, Kristin Kozlowski, Meghan M Hiss, Amanda J Ortmann, Erin R Nelson-Bakkum, Andreas Büchner, Rolf Salcher, Steven A Harvey, Michael E Hoffer, Jorge E Bohorquez, Farid Alzhrani, Rana Alshihri, Fida Almuhawas, Christopher J Danner, David R Friedland, Michael D Seidman, Thomas Lenarz, Fred F Telischi, Robert F Labadie, Craig A Buchman, Oliver F Adunka\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To prospectively evaluate the association between hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CI) and intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) amplitude parameters.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Multi-institutional, prospective randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ten high-volume, tertiary care CI centers.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults (n = 87) with sensorineural hearing loss meeting CI criteria (2018-2021) with audiometric thresholds of ≤80 dB HL at 500 Hz.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomized to CI surgery with or without audible ECochG monitoring. Electrode arrays were inserted to the full-depth marker. Hearing preservation was determined by comparing pre-CI, unaided low-frequency (125-, 250-, and 500-Hz) pure-tone average (LF-PTA) to LF-PTA at CI activation. Three ECochG amplitude parameters were analyzed: 1) insertion track patterns, 2) magnitude of ECochG amplitude change, and 3) total number of ECochG amplitude drops.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Type CC insertion track pattern, representing corrected drops in ECochG amplitude, was seen in 76% of cases with ECochG \\\"on,\\\" compared with 24% of cases with ECochG \\\"off\\\" ( p = 0.003). The magnitude of ECochG signal drop was significantly correlated with the amount of LF-PTA change pre-CI and post-CI ( p < 0.05). The mean number of amplitude drops during electrode insertion was significantly correlated with change in LF-PTA at activation and 3 months post-CI ( p ≤ 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECochG amplitude parameters during CI surgery have important prognostic utility. Higher incidence of Type CC in ECochG \\\"on\\\" suggests that monitoring may be useful for surgeons in order to recover the ECochG signal and preventing potentially traumatic electrode-cochlear interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004286\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的前瞻性评估人工耳蜗植入术(CI)后听力保护与蜗内耳蜗电图(ECochG)振幅参数之间的关系:多机构、前瞻性随机临床试验:患者:成人(n = 87):符合 CI 标准(2018-2021 年)、听阈在 500 Hz 时≤80 dB HL 的感音神经性听力损失成人(n = 87):参试者被随机分配接受带或不带可听心电图监测的 CI 手术。电极阵列插入到全深度标记处。听力保护是通过比较植入 CI 前的无助低频(125、250 和 500 赫兹)纯音平均值(LF-PTA)和 CI 激活时的 LF-PTA 来确定的。分析了三个心电图振幅参数:1)插入轨迹模式;2)心电图振幅变化幅度;3)心电图振幅下降总数:结果:在心电图 "开 "的病例中,有 76% 出现了 CC 型插入轨迹模式,代表心电图振幅的校正下降,而在心电图 "关 "的病例中,只有 24% 出现这种模式(p = 0.003)。心电图信号下降的幅度与 LF-PTA 在 CI 前和 CI 后的变化量显著相关(p < 0.05)。电极插入时振幅下降的平均次数与 LF-PTA 在激活时和 CI 后 3 个月的变化显著相关(p ≤ 0.01):结论:CI手术期间的心电图振幅参数具有重要的预后作用。结论:CI手术期间的ECochG振幅参数对预后有重要作用。ECochG "开启 "时CC型的发生率较高,这表明监测可能对外科医生恢复ECochG信号和防止潜在的电极-耳蜗相互作用创伤有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Amplitude Parameters Are Predictive of Hearing Preservation in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Objective: To prospectively evaluate the association between hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CI) and intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) amplitude parameters.

Study design: Multi-institutional, prospective randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Ten high-volume, tertiary care CI centers.

Patients: Adults (n = 87) with sensorineural hearing loss meeting CI criteria (2018-2021) with audiometric thresholds of ≤80 dB HL at 500 Hz.

Methods: Participants were randomized to CI surgery with or without audible ECochG monitoring. Electrode arrays were inserted to the full-depth marker. Hearing preservation was determined by comparing pre-CI, unaided low-frequency (125-, 250-, and 500-Hz) pure-tone average (LF-PTA) to LF-PTA at CI activation. Three ECochG amplitude parameters were analyzed: 1) insertion track patterns, 2) magnitude of ECochG amplitude change, and 3) total number of ECochG amplitude drops.

Results: The Type CC insertion track pattern, representing corrected drops in ECochG amplitude, was seen in 76% of cases with ECochG "on," compared with 24% of cases with ECochG "off" ( p = 0.003). The magnitude of ECochG signal drop was significantly correlated with the amount of LF-PTA change pre-CI and post-CI ( p < 0.05). The mean number of amplitude drops during electrode insertion was significantly correlated with change in LF-PTA at activation and 3 months post-CI ( p ≤ 0.01).

Conclusions: ECochG amplitude parameters during CI surgery have important prognostic utility. Higher incidence of Type CC in ECochG "on" suggests that monitoring may be useful for surgeons in order to recover the ECochG signal and preventing potentially traumatic electrode-cochlear interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信