对英国电子烟包装正面尼古丁描述的内容分析。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Allison Ford, Anne Marie MacKintosh, Amber Morgan, Daniel Jones, Crawford Moodie, Kate Hunt, Kathryn Angus
{"title":"对英国电子烟包装正面尼古丁描述的内容分析。","authors":"Allison Ford, Anne Marie MacKintosh, Amber Morgan, Daniel Jones, Crawford Moodie, Kate Hunt, Kathryn Angus","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Tobacco and Related Products Regulations (TRPR) 2016 require consumers in the United Kingdom to be informed about the presence of nicotine in vaping products. However, there is misunderstanding among some young people and adults around the strength of products. We examined how nicotine content is displayed on the front of vape packaging in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Between August and December 2022, we systematically analyzed a representative, stratified selection of vapes and refill packs (n = 156) on the UK market to assess TRPR compliance. This paper presents an analysis of free-text responses collected to indicate the presence of nicotine information on the front-of-pack including metric, percentage, graphic, and text indicators. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics produced for the sample as a whole and for five product categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most packs (n = 126, 81%) displayed at least one front-of-pack nicotine descriptor, including the majority of disposables (n = 43, 90%), e-liquid (n = 42, 88%) and refill pods (n = 36, 100%). Many packs (n = 107, 69%) contained a nicotine-related metric (eg mg/ml), a quarter (n = 37, 24%) included a percentage indicator and most (n = 126, 81%) displayed at least one of these. Almost two-fifths (n = 57, 37%) mentioned nicotine beyond the warning. Less observed indicators included graphic and textual depictions of strength, dosage information, and an equivalent number of cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The front of vape packaging communicates important product information to consumers. There is inconsistency in how nicotine content is currently displayed. Future research should examine how best to display nicotine content to promote consumer understanding and informed decision making.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This pack analysis of a representative sample of UK vape packaging highlights the varied ways in which nicotine content and strength are currently communicated to consumers on the front of vape packaging. The inconsistent presentation of nicotine content on the front of packs may contribute to misperceptions around product strength. A consistent and easily understood way of communicating nicotine content on the front of vape packaging may help consumers make more informed choices about vape products.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"152-156"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Content Analysis of Nicotine Descriptors on the Front of Vape Packaging in the United Kingdom.\",\"authors\":\"Allison Ford, Anne Marie MacKintosh, Amber Morgan, Daniel Jones, Crawford Moodie, Kate Hunt, Kathryn Angus\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Tobacco and Related Products Regulations (TRPR) 2016 require consumers in the United Kingdom to be informed about the presence of nicotine in vaping products. However, there is misunderstanding among some young people and adults around the strength of products. We examined how nicotine content is displayed on the front of vape packaging in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Between August and December 2022, we systematically analyzed a representative, stratified selection of vapes and refill packs (n = 156) on the UK market to assess TRPR compliance. This paper presents an analysis of free-text responses collected to indicate the presence of nicotine information on the front-of-pack including metric, percentage, graphic, and text indicators. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics produced for the sample as a whole and for five product categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most packs (n = 126, 81%) displayed at least one front-of-pack nicotine descriptor, including the majority of disposables (n = 43, 90%), e-liquid (n = 42, 88%) and refill pods (n = 36, 100%). Many packs (n = 107, 69%) contained a nicotine-related metric (eg mg/ml), a quarter (n = 37, 24%) included a percentage indicator and most (n = 126, 81%) displayed at least one of these. Almost two-fifths (n = 57, 37%) mentioned nicotine beyond the warning. Less observed indicators included graphic and textual depictions of strength, dosage information, and an equivalent number of cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The front of vape packaging communicates important product information to consumers. There is inconsistency in how nicotine content is currently displayed. Future research should examine how best to display nicotine content to promote consumer understanding and informed decision making.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This pack analysis of a representative sample of UK vape packaging highlights the varied ways in which nicotine content and strength are currently communicated to consumers on the front of vape packaging. The inconsistent presentation of nicotine content on the front of packs may contribute to misperceptions around product strength. A consistent and easily understood way of communicating nicotine content on the front of vape packaging may help consumers make more informed choices about vape products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"152-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663797/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae168\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:2016 年烟草及相关产品法规》(TRPR)要求英国消费者了解电子烟产品中尼古丁的含量。然而,一些年轻人和成年人对产品的尼古丁含量存在误解。我们研究了英国电子烟包装正面如何显示尼古丁含量:2022 年 8 月至 12 月期间,我们系统分析了英国市场上具有代表性、分层选择的吸食器和补充装(n=156),以评估 TRPR 合规性。本文分析了收集到的自由文本回复,以说明包装正面是否有尼古丁信息,包括公制、百分比、图形和文本指标。数据分析采用了针对整个样本和五个产品类别的描述性统计方法:大多数包装(样本数=126,81%)在包装正面至少显示了一个尼古丁描述,包括大多数一次性产品(样本数=43,90%)、电子烟油(样本数=42,88%)和补充装(样本数=36,100%)。许多包装(n=107,69%)包含尼古丁相关指标(如毫克/毫升),四分之一的包装(n=37,24%)包含百分比指标,大多数包装(n=126,81%)至少显示了其中一个指标。近五分之二(n=57,37%)在警告之外提到尼古丁。观察较少的指标包括强度、剂量信息和等量香烟的图形和文字描述:结论:汽水包装正面向消费者传达了重要的产品信息。目前尼古丁含量的显示方式并不一致。未来的研究应探讨如何以最佳方式显示尼古丁含量,以促进消费者理解并做出明智决策:对具有代表性的英国汽水包装样本进行的包装分析突出表明,目前在汽水包装正面向消费者传达尼古丁含量和强度的方式多种多样。包装正面对尼古丁含量的不一致表述可能会造成对产品强度的误解。在vape包装正面以一致且易于理解的方式传达尼古丁含量,可能有助于消费者对vape产品做出更明智的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Content Analysis of Nicotine Descriptors on the Front of Vape Packaging in the United Kingdom.

Introduction: The Tobacco and Related Products Regulations (TRPR) 2016 require consumers in the United Kingdom to be informed about the presence of nicotine in vaping products. However, there is misunderstanding among some young people and adults around the strength of products. We examined how nicotine content is displayed on the front of vape packaging in the United Kingdom.

Aims and methods: Between August and December 2022, we systematically analyzed a representative, stratified selection of vapes and refill packs (n = 156) on the UK market to assess TRPR compliance. This paper presents an analysis of free-text responses collected to indicate the presence of nicotine information on the front-of-pack including metric, percentage, graphic, and text indicators. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics produced for the sample as a whole and for five product categories.

Results: Most packs (n = 126, 81%) displayed at least one front-of-pack nicotine descriptor, including the majority of disposables (n = 43, 90%), e-liquid (n = 42, 88%) and refill pods (n = 36, 100%). Many packs (n = 107, 69%) contained a nicotine-related metric (eg mg/ml), a quarter (n = 37, 24%) included a percentage indicator and most (n = 126, 81%) displayed at least one of these. Almost two-fifths (n = 57, 37%) mentioned nicotine beyond the warning. Less observed indicators included graphic and textual depictions of strength, dosage information, and an equivalent number of cigarettes.

Conclusions: The front of vape packaging communicates important product information to consumers. There is inconsistency in how nicotine content is currently displayed. Future research should examine how best to display nicotine content to promote consumer understanding and informed decision making.

Implications: This pack analysis of a representative sample of UK vape packaging highlights the varied ways in which nicotine content and strength are currently communicated to consumers on the front of vape packaging. The inconsistent presentation of nicotine content on the front of packs may contribute to misperceptions around product strength. A consistent and easily understood way of communicating nicotine content on the front of vape packaging may help consumers make more informed choices about vape products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信