Imke Masuy, Wout Verbeure, Emily Ruilova Sosoranga, Julie Tackoen, Hideki Mori, Lukas Van Oudenhove, Jan Tack
{"title":"左旋薄荷醇和胡芦巴油的组合不会影响胃功能,但会增加健康人的饥饿感。","authors":"Imke Masuy, Wout Verbeure, Emily Ruilova Sosoranga, Julie Tackoen, Hideki Mori, Lukas Van Oudenhove, Jan Tack","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The heterogeneous character of functional gastrointestinal disorders, recently renamed into disorders of gut-brain interaction, makes finding effective treatment options challenging. Compared to synthetic drugs, phytotherapy can have broader pharmacological effects and is often better tolerated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of peppermint oil and caraway oil (POCO) on gastric function and symptom levels in 32 healthy subjects in a single-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gastric emptying rate was assessed using a <sup>13</sup>C-breath test. Intragastric pressure was measured using high-resolution manometry in fasted state and during intragastric infusion of a nutrient drink (350 mL or until full satiation). GI symptoms were rated on a 100 mm VAS. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>POCO had no effect on intragastric pressure in fasted or fed state (p > 0.08 for all). No significant differences in gastric emptying rate were observed (p = 0.54). In the fasted state, a stronger increase in hunger and decrease in satiety were observed following POCO (p = 0.016 and p = 0.008, respectively). No differences in hunger and satiety were observed in the fed state (p > 0.31 for all). POCO induced less epigastric burning, bloating, and fullness (p < 0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acute POCO administration did not affect gastric function in healthy subjects, but increased fasted hunger ratings. The effects of POCO on gastric function and hunger sensations in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction, and the contribution to symptom improvement, needs to be elucidated in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e14880"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The combination of L-menthol and caraway oil does not affect gastric function but increases hunger in healthy subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Imke Masuy, Wout Verbeure, Emily Ruilova Sosoranga, Julie Tackoen, Hideki Mori, Lukas Van Oudenhove, Jan Tack\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.14880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The heterogeneous character of functional gastrointestinal disorders, recently renamed into disorders of gut-brain interaction, makes finding effective treatment options challenging. Compared to synthetic drugs, phytotherapy can have broader pharmacological effects and is often better tolerated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of peppermint oil and caraway oil (POCO) on gastric function and symptom levels in 32 healthy subjects in a single-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gastric emptying rate was assessed using a <sup>13</sup>C-breath test. Intragastric pressure was measured using high-resolution manometry in fasted state and during intragastric infusion of a nutrient drink (350 mL or until full satiation). GI symptoms were rated on a 100 mm VAS. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>POCO had no effect on intragastric pressure in fasted or fed state (p > 0.08 for all). No significant differences in gastric emptying rate were observed (p = 0.54). In the fasted state, a stronger increase in hunger and decrease in satiety were observed following POCO (p = 0.016 and p = 0.008, respectively). No differences in hunger and satiety were observed in the fed state (p > 0.31 for all). POCO induced less epigastric burning, bloating, and fullness (p < 0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acute POCO administration did not affect gastric function in healthy subjects, but increased fasted hunger ratings. The effects of POCO on gastric function and hunger sensations in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction, and the contribution to symptom improvement, needs to be elucidated in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14880\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14880\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:功能性胃肠道疾病最近被重新命名为肠道-大脑相互作用疾病,其异质性使得寻找有效的治疗方案充满挑战。与合成药物相比,植物疗法具有更广泛的药理作用,而且通常耐受性更好。本研究旨在通过单盲、安慰剂对照、随机、平行设计的方法,调查薄荷油和胡芦巴油(POCO)对 32 名健康受试者胃功能和症状水平的影响:方法:使用 13C 呼气试验评估胃排空率。在空腹状态和胃内注入营养饮料(350 毫升或直至完全饱腹)期间,使用高分辨率测压法测量胃内压。消化道症状以 100 毫米 VAS 进行评分。数据采用线性混合模型进行分析:主要结果:POCO 对空腹或进食状态下的胃内压没有影响(均 p > 0.08)。胃排空率无明显差异(p = 0.54)。在空腹状态下,观察到 POCO 后饥饿感增强,饱腹感降低(分别为 p = 0.016 和 p = 0.008)。在进食状态下,没有观察到饥饿感和饱腹感的差异(均为 p > 0.31)。POCO 引起的上腹灼热感、腹胀和饱腹感较少(p 结论):急性服用 POCO 不会影响健康受试者的胃功能,但会增加空腹饥饿感。POCO对肠道-大脑相互作用失调患者胃功能和饥饿感的影响以及对症状改善的作用,需要在今后的研究中加以阐明。
The combination of L-menthol and caraway oil does not affect gastric function but increases hunger in healthy subjects.
Background: The heterogeneous character of functional gastrointestinal disorders, recently renamed into disorders of gut-brain interaction, makes finding effective treatment options challenging. Compared to synthetic drugs, phytotherapy can have broader pharmacological effects and is often better tolerated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of peppermint oil and caraway oil (POCO) on gastric function and symptom levels in 32 healthy subjects in a single-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel design.
Methods: Gastric emptying rate was assessed using a 13C-breath test. Intragastric pressure was measured using high-resolution manometry in fasted state and during intragastric infusion of a nutrient drink (350 mL or until full satiation). GI symptoms were rated on a 100 mm VAS. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models.
Key results: POCO had no effect on intragastric pressure in fasted or fed state (p > 0.08 for all). No significant differences in gastric emptying rate were observed (p = 0.54). In the fasted state, a stronger increase in hunger and decrease in satiety were observed following POCO (p = 0.016 and p = 0.008, respectively). No differences in hunger and satiety were observed in the fed state (p > 0.31 for all). POCO induced less epigastric burning, bloating, and fullness (p < 0.05 for all).
Conclusions: Acute POCO administration did not affect gastric function in healthy subjects, but increased fasted hunger ratings. The effects of POCO on gastric function and hunger sensations in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction, and the contribution to symptom improvement, needs to be elucidated in future studies.
期刊介绍:
Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.