不同病毒去除过滤器中蛋白质对病毒滞留影响的比较分析

IF 3.3 4区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Mohammad A Afzal, Joshua Peles, Andrew L Zydney
{"title":"不同病毒去除过滤器中蛋白质对病毒滞留影响的比较分析","authors":"Mohammad A Afzal, Joshua Peles, Andrew L Zydney","doi":"10.3390/membranes14070158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The performance of virus filters is often determined by the extent of protein fouling, which can affect both filtrate flux and virus retention. However, the mechanisms governing changes in virus retention in the presence of proteins are still not well understood. The objective of this work was to examine the effect of proteins on virus retention by both asymmetric (Viresolve<sup>®</sup> NFP and Viresolve<sup>®</sup> Pro) and relatively homogeneous (Ultipor<sup>®</sup> DV20 and Pegasus<sup>TM</sup> SV4) virus filtration membranes. Experiments were performed with bacteriophage ϕX174 as a model parvovirus and human serum immunoglobulin G (hIgG) as a model protein. The virus retention in 1 g/L hIgG solutions was consistently less than that in a protein-free buffer solution by between 1 to 3 logs for the different virus filters. The virus retention profiles for the two homogeneous membranes were very similar, with the virus retention being highly correlated with the extent of flux decline. Membranes prefouled with hIgG and then challenged with phages also showed much lower virus retention, demonstrating the importance of membrane fouling; the one exception was the Viresolve<sup>®</sup> Pro membrane, which showed a similar virus retention for the prefouled and pristine membranes. Experiments in which the protein was filtered after the virus challenge demonstrated that hIgG can displace previously captured viruses from within a filter. The magnitude of these effects significantly varied for the different virus filters, likely due to differences in membrane morphology, pore size distribution, and chemistry, providing important insights into the development/application of virus filtration in bioprocessing.</p>","PeriodicalId":18410,"journal":{"name":"Membranes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11278833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Protein on Virus Retention for Different Virus Removal Filters.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad A Afzal, Joshua Peles, Andrew L Zydney\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/membranes14070158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The performance of virus filters is often determined by the extent of protein fouling, which can affect both filtrate flux and virus retention. However, the mechanisms governing changes in virus retention in the presence of proteins are still not well understood. The objective of this work was to examine the effect of proteins on virus retention by both asymmetric (Viresolve<sup>®</sup> NFP and Viresolve<sup>®</sup> Pro) and relatively homogeneous (Ultipor<sup>®</sup> DV20 and Pegasus<sup>TM</sup> SV4) virus filtration membranes. Experiments were performed with bacteriophage ϕX174 as a model parvovirus and human serum immunoglobulin G (hIgG) as a model protein. The virus retention in 1 g/L hIgG solutions was consistently less than that in a protein-free buffer solution by between 1 to 3 logs for the different virus filters. The virus retention profiles for the two homogeneous membranes were very similar, with the virus retention being highly correlated with the extent of flux decline. Membranes prefouled with hIgG and then challenged with phages also showed much lower virus retention, demonstrating the importance of membrane fouling; the one exception was the Viresolve<sup>®</sup> Pro membrane, which showed a similar virus retention for the prefouled and pristine membranes. Experiments in which the protein was filtered after the virus challenge demonstrated that hIgG can displace previously captured viruses from within a filter. The magnitude of these effects significantly varied for the different virus filters, likely due to differences in membrane morphology, pore size distribution, and chemistry, providing important insights into the development/application of virus filtration in bioprocessing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Membranes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11278833/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Membranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14070158\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Membranes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14070158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

病毒过滤器的性能通常取决于蛋白质结垢的程度,蛋白质结垢会影响滤液通量和病毒截留率。然而,人们对蛋白质存在时病毒截留率的变化机制仍不甚了解。这项工作的目的是研究蛋白质对非对称(Viresolve® NFP 和 Viresolve® Pro)和相对均质(Ultipor® DV20 和 PegasusTM SV4)病毒过滤膜截留病毒的影响。实验以噬菌体ϕX174 为 parvovirus 模型,以人血清免疫球蛋白 G (hIgG) 为模型蛋白。对于不同的病毒过滤器,病毒在 1 g/L hIgG 溶液中的滞留率始终比在不含蛋白质的缓冲溶液中低 1 至 3 logs。两种均质膜的病毒滞留曲线非常相似,病毒滞留与通量下降的程度高度相关。用 hIgG 预污后再用噬菌体挑战的膜也显示出更低的病毒截留率,这证明了膜结垢的重要性;Viresolve® Pro 膜是一个例外,它在预污膜和原始膜上显示出相似的病毒截留率。在病毒挑战后过滤蛋白质的实验表明,hIgG 能将先前捕获的病毒从过滤器中置换出来。这些效应的大小在不同的病毒过滤器中存在显著差异,这可能是由于膜的形态、孔径分布和化学性质不同造成的,为生物处理中病毒过滤的开发/应用提供了重要的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Protein on Virus Retention for Different Virus Removal Filters.

The performance of virus filters is often determined by the extent of protein fouling, which can affect both filtrate flux and virus retention. However, the mechanisms governing changes in virus retention in the presence of proteins are still not well understood. The objective of this work was to examine the effect of proteins on virus retention by both asymmetric (Viresolve® NFP and Viresolve® Pro) and relatively homogeneous (Ultipor® DV20 and PegasusTM SV4) virus filtration membranes. Experiments were performed with bacteriophage ϕX174 as a model parvovirus and human serum immunoglobulin G (hIgG) as a model protein. The virus retention in 1 g/L hIgG solutions was consistently less than that in a protein-free buffer solution by between 1 to 3 logs for the different virus filters. The virus retention profiles for the two homogeneous membranes were very similar, with the virus retention being highly correlated with the extent of flux decline. Membranes prefouled with hIgG and then challenged with phages also showed much lower virus retention, demonstrating the importance of membrane fouling; the one exception was the Viresolve® Pro membrane, which showed a similar virus retention for the prefouled and pristine membranes. Experiments in which the protein was filtered after the virus challenge demonstrated that hIgG can displace previously captured viruses from within a filter. The magnitude of these effects significantly varied for the different virus filters, likely due to differences in membrane morphology, pore size distribution, and chemistry, providing important insights into the development/application of virus filtration in bioprocessing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Membranes
Membranes Chemical Engineering-Filtration and Separation
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1071
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Membranes (ISSN 2077-0375) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of separation science and technology. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and technical notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信