辐射引起的脱毛与介入神经放射学手术的关联。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Deborah Carrick, Vinicius Carraro do Nascimento, Laetitia de Villiers, Henry Rice
{"title":"辐射引起的脱毛与介入神经放射学手术的关联。","authors":"Deborah Carrick,&nbsp;Vinicius Carraro do Nascimento,&nbsp;Laetitia de Villiers,&nbsp;Henry Rice","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study is to quantify the association of temporary epilation following interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures and compare the peak skin dose (<i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub>) threshold to published values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Gold Coast University Hospital (GCUH) is a major centre for INR with over 500 primarily interventional procedures performed every year. <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> is calculated when the reference air kerma (<i>K</i><sub>a,r</sub>) exceeds 3 Gy. If the <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> exceeds 3 Gy, the patient is followed up for any skin effects. An audit was undertaken of these results over a 2-year period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From January 2020 to December 2021, 140 patients who underwent INR procedures had a <i>K</i><sub>a,r</sub> &gt; 3 Gy, 66 resulted in a calculated <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> &gt;3 Gy, and 45 were successfully followed up. Twenty patients (44%) reported no skin effects and 25 (56%) reported skin effects, which were almost exclusively epilation. The mean (range) <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> for patients with no reported skin effects and those with observed skin effects was 4.6 Gy (3.0–11.1 Gy) and 4.2 Gy (3.0–7.0 Gy), respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These results demonstrate that temporary epilation was observed in 56% of patients, in a cohort of 45 patients who underwent an INR procedure with calculated <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> &gt;3 Gy and successful follow-up. The results support evidence in the literature that suggests the approximate threshold for temporary epilation reported by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) may be too high for incidence of this effect, specifically on the scalp, when <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> is calculated from <i>K</i><sub>a,r</sub> (using commonly used corrections and assumptions in the calculation).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 7","pages":"787-795"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of radiation-induced epilation and interventional neuroradiology procedures\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Carrick,&nbsp;Vinicius Carraro do Nascimento,&nbsp;Laetitia de Villiers,&nbsp;Henry Rice\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study is to quantify the association of temporary epilation following interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures and compare the peak skin dose (<i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub>) threshold to published values.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Gold Coast University Hospital (GCUH) is a major centre for INR with over 500 primarily interventional procedures performed every year. <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> is calculated when the reference air kerma (<i>K</i><sub>a,r</sub>) exceeds 3 Gy. If the <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> exceeds 3 Gy, the patient is followed up for any skin effects. An audit was undertaken of these results over a 2-year period.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>From January 2020 to December 2021, 140 patients who underwent INR procedures had a <i>K</i><sub>a,r</sub> &gt; 3 Gy, 66 resulted in a calculated <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> &gt;3 Gy, and 45 were successfully followed up. Twenty patients (44%) reported no skin effects and 25 (56%) reported skin effects, which were almost exclusively epilation. The mean (range) <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> for patients with no reported skin effects and those with observed skin effects was 4.6 Gy (3.0–11.1 Gy) and 4.2 Gy (3.0–7.0 Gy), respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>These results demonstrate that temporary epilation was observed in 56% of patients, in a cohort of 45 patients who underwent an INR procedure with calculated <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> &gt;3 Gy and successful follow-up. The results support evidence in the literature that suggests the approximate threshold for temporary epilation reported by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) may be too high for incidence of this effect, specifically on the scalp, when <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> is calculated from <i>K</i><sub>a,r</sub> (using commonly used corrections and assumptions in the calculation).</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"68 7\",\"pages\":\"787-795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13730\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13730","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究旨在量化介入神经放射学(INR)手术后临时脱毛的相关性,并比较皮肤峰值剂量(Dskin,max)阈值:本研究旨在量化介入神经放射学(INR)手术后临时脱毛的相关性,并将峰值皮肤剂量(Dskin,max)阈值与已公布的数值进行比较:黄金海岸大学医院(GCUH)是主要的介入神经放射中心,每年主要进行 500 多例介入手术。当参考空气切尔马(Ka,r)超过 3 Gy 时,就会计算出 Dskin,max 值。如果 Dskin,max 超过 3 Gy,就会对患者的皮肤影响进行跟踪。对这些结果进行了为期两年的审计:2020年1月至2021年12月,140名接受INR手术的患者的Ka,r>3 Gy,66名患者的计算Dskin,max>3 Gy,45名患者成功接受了随访。20名患者(44%)报告没有皮肤效应,25名患者(56%)报告有皮肤效应,几乎全部是脱毛。未报告皮肤效应的患者和观察到皮肤效应的患者的 Dskin,max 平均值(范围)分别为 4.6 Gy(3.0-11.1 Gy)和 4.2 Gy(3.0-7.0 Gy):这些结果表明,在接受 INR 手术的 45 名患者中,有 56% 的患者观察到了暂时性脱毛,计算出的 Dskin,max >3 Gy,并进行了成功的随访。这些结果支持了文献中的证据,即国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)报告的暂时性脱毛的近似阈值可能过高,无法从 Ka,r 计算出 Dskin,max (在计算中使用常用的校正和假设),特别是对头皮而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of radiation-induced epilation and interventional neuroradiology procedures

Introduction

The aim of this study is to quantify the association of temporary epilation following interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures and compare the peak skin dose (Dskin,max) threshold to published values.

Methods

Gold Coast University Hospital (GCUH) is a major centre for INR with over 500 primarily interventional procedures performed every year. Dskin,max is calculated when the reference air kerma (Ka,r) exceeds 3 Gy. If the Dskin,max exceeds 3 Gy, the patient is followed up for any skin effects. An audit was undertaken of these results over a 2-year period.

Results

From January 2020 to December 2021, 140 patients who underwent INR procedures had a Ka,r > 3 Gy, 66 resulted in a calculated Dskin,max >3 Gy, and 45 were successfully followed up. Twenty patients (44%) reported no skin effects and 25 (56%) reported skin effects, which were almost exclusively epilation. The mean (range) Dskin,max for patients with no reported skin effects and those with observed skin effects was 4.6 Gy (3.0–11.1 Gy) and 4.2 Gy (3.0–7.0 Gy), respectively.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate that temporary epilation was observed in 56% of patients, in a cohort of 45 patients who underwent an INR procedure with calculated Dskin,max >3 Gy and successful follow-up. The results support evidence in the literature that suggests the approximate threshold for temporary epilation reported by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) may be too high for incidence of this effect, specifically on the scalp, when Dskin,max is calculated from Ka,r (using commonly used corrections and assumptions in the calculation).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信