Deborah Carrick, Vinicius Carraro do Nascimento, Laetitia de Villiers, Henry Rice
{"title":"辐射引起的脱毛与介入神经放射学手术的关联。","authors":"Deborah Carrick, Vinicius Carraro do Nascimento, Laetitia de Villiers, Henry Rice","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study is to quantify the association of temporary epilation following interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures and compare the peak skin dose (<i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub>) threshold to published values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Gold Coast University Hospital (GCUH) is a major centre for INR with over 500 primarily interventional procedures performed every year. <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> is calculated when the reference air kerma (<i>K</i><sub>a,r</sub>) exceeds 3 Gy. If the <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> exceeds 3 Gy, the patient is followed up for any skin effects. An audit was undertaken of these results over a 2-year period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From January 2020 to December 2021, 140 patients who underwent INR procedures had a <i>K</i><sub>a,r</sub> > 3 Gy, 66 resulted in a calculated <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> >3 Gy, and 45 were successfully followed up. Twenty patients (44%) reported no skin effects and 25 (56%) reported skin effects, which were almost exclusively epilation. The mean (range) <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> for patients with no reported skin effects and those with observed skin effects was 4.6 Gy (3.0–11.1 Gy) and 4.2 Gy (3.0–7.0 Gy), respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These results demonstrate that temporary epilation was observed in 56% of patients, in a cohort of 45 patients who underwent an INR procedure with calculated <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> >3 Gy and successful follow-up. The results support evidence in the literature that suggests the approximate threshold for temporary epilation reported by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) may be too high for incidence of this effect, specifically on the scalp, when <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> is calculated from <i>K</i><sub>a,r</sub> (using commonly used corrections and assumptions in the calculation).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 7","pages":"787-795"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of radiation-induced epilation and interventional neuroradiology procedures\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Carrick, Vinicius Carraro do Nascimento, Laetitia de Villiers, Henry Rice\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study is to quantify the association of temporary epilation following interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures and compare the peak skin dose (<i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub>) threshold to published values.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Gold Coast University Hospital (GCUH) is a major centre for INR with over 500 primarily interventional procedures performed every year. <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> is calculated when the reference air kerma (<i>K</i><sub>a,r</sub>) exceeds 3 Gy. If the <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> exceeds 3 Gy, the patient is followed up for any skin effects. An audit was undertaken of these results over a 2-year period.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>From January 2020 to December 2021, 140 patients who underwent INR procedures had a <i>K</i><sub>a,r</sub> > 3 Gy, 66 resulted in a calculated <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> >3 Gy, and 45 were successfully followed up. Twenty patients (44%) reported no skin effects and 25 (56%) reported skin effects, which were almost exclusively epilation. The mean (range) <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> for patients with no reported skin effects and those with observed skin effects was 4.6 Gy (3.0–11.1 Gy) and 4.2 Gy (3.0–7.0 Gy), respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>These results demonstrate that temporary epilation was observed in 56% of patients, in a cohort of 45 patients who underwent an INR procedure with calculated <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> >3 Gy and successful follow-up. The results support evidence in the literature that suggests the approximate threshold for temporary epilation reported by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) may be too high for incidence of this effect, specifically on the scalp, when <i>D</i><sub>skin,max</sub> is calculated from <i>K</i><sub>a,r</sub> (using commonly used corrections and assumptions in the calculation).</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"68 7\",\"pages\":\"787-795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13730\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13730","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association of radiation-induced epilation and interventional neuroradiology procedures
Introduction
The aim of this study is to quantify the association of temporary epilation following interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures and compare the peak skin dose (Dskin,max) threshold to published values.
Methods
Gold Coast University Hospital (GCUH) is a major centre for INR with over 500 primarily interventional procedures performed every year. Dskin,max is calculated when the reference air kerma (Ka,r) exceeds 3 Gy. If the Dskin,max exceeds 3 Gy, the patient is followed up for any skin effects. An audit was undertaken of these results over a 2-year period.
Results
From January 2020 to December 2021, 140 patients who underwent INR procedures had a Ka,r > 3 Gy, 66 resulted in a calculated Dskin,max >3 Gy, and 45 were successfully followed up. Twenty patients (44%) reported no skin effects and 25 (56%) reported skin effects, which were almost exclusively epilation. The mean (range) Dskin,max for patients with no reported skin effects and those with observed skin effects was 4.6 Gy (3.0–11.1 Gy) and 4.2 Gy (3.0–7.0 Gy), respectively.
Conclusion
These results demonstrate that temporary epilation was observed in 56% of patients, in a cohort of 45 patients who underwent an INR procedure with calculated Dskin,max >3 Gy and successful follow-up. The results support evidence in the literature that suggests the approximate threshold for temporary epilation reported by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) may be too high for incidence of this effect, specifically on the scalp, when Dskin,max is calculated from Ka,r (using commonly used corrections and assumptions in the calculation).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.