人体的静态自动调节

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Olaf B Paulson, Svend Strandgaard, Jes Olesen, Jean-Claude Baron
{"title":"人体的静态自动调节","authors":"Olaf B Paulson, Svend Strandgaard, Jes Olesen, Jean-Claude Baron","doi":"10.1177/0271678X241258701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A recent publication in JCBFM, \"Static autoregulation in humans\" gives rise to critical comments. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow implies that flow is rather constant within a certain blood pressure (BP) range with a lower and an upper pressure limit. The physiology at the two limits is very different, making comparison of the brain's vulnerability at the limits questionable. The recent publication in JCBFM claims a narrow autoregulatory range based on pooling of data from several studies. However, we argue that such pooling blurs the autoregulatory limits. We summarize the classical literature, therefrom we argue for a broad autoregulatory range.</p>","PeriodicalId":15325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Static autoregulation in humans.\",\"authors\":\"Olaf B Paulson, Svend Strandgaard, Jes Olesen, Jean-Claude Baron\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0271678X241258701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A recent publication in JCBFM, \\\"Static autoregulation in humans\\\" gives rise to critical comments. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow implies that flow is rather constant within a certain blood pressure (BP) range with a lower and an upper pressure limit. The physiology at the two limits is very different, making comparison of the brain's vulnerability at the limits questionable. The recent publication in JCBFM claims a narrow autoregulatory range based on pooling of data from several studies. However, we argue that such pooling blurs the autoregulatory limits. We summarize the classical literature, therefrom we argue for a broad autoregulatory range.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X241258701\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X241258701","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

JCBFM 最近发表的一篇题为 "人类的静态自动调节 "的文章引起了批评。脑血流的自动调节意味着,在一定的血压(BP)范围内,血流是相当恒定的,有一个血压下限和一个血压上限。这两个极限的生理学原理截然不同,因此,比较大脑在这两个极限的脆弱性是值得商榷的。JCBFM 上最近发表的一篇文章称,根据对多项研究数据的汇总,自动调节范围较窄。然而,我们认为这种数据汇集模糊了自动调节极限。我们总结了经典文献,并据此提出了宽泛的自动调节范围的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Static autoregulation in humans.

A recent publication in JCBFM, "Static autoregulation in humans" gives rise to critical comments. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow implies that flow is rather constant within a certain blood pressure (BP) range with a lower and an upper pressure limit. The physiology at the two limits is very different, making comparison of the brain's vulnerability at the limits questionable. The recent publication in JCBFM claims a narrow autoregulatory range based on pooling of data from several studies. However, we argue that such pooling blurs the autoregulatory limits. We summarize the classical literature, therefrom we argue for a broad autoregulatory range.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JCBFM is the official journal of the International Society for Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, which is committed to publishing high quality, independently peer-reviewed research and review material. JCBFM stands at the interface between basic and clinical neurovascular research, and features timely and relevant research highlighting experimental, theoretical, and clinical aspects of brain circulation, metabolism and imaging. The journal is relevant to any physician or scientist with an interest in brain function, cerebrovascular disease, cerebral vascular regulation and brain metabolism, including neurologists, neurochemists, physiologists, pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, neuropathologists and neuroscientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信