利用基于全外显子组测序的单一方法确定子宫内膜癌分子亚型。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Alexander Mustea, Damian J Ralser, Eva K Egger, Ulrike Ziehm, Sonia Vivas, Stephan Brock, David Jackson, Mateja Condic, Marc-A Rauschendorf, Patrick Würfel, Frank Dombrowski, Lucia A Otten, Pengming Sun, Anna Laib, Miguel Cubas Cordova, Rahel Hartmann, Martin A Stein, Dominique Koensgen, Matthias B Stope
{"title":"利用基于全外显子组测序的单一方法确定子宫内膜癌分子亚型。","authors":"Alexander Mustea, Damian J Ralser, Eva K Egger, Ulrike Ziehm, Sonia Vivas, Stephan Brock, David Jackson, Mateja Condic, Marc-A Rauschendorf, Patrick Würfel, Frank Dombrowski, Lucia A Otten, Pengming Sun, Anna Laib, Miguel Cubas Cordova, Rahel Hartmann, Martin A Stein, Dominique Koensgen, Matthias B Stope","doi":"10.1007/s00432-024-05901-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Endometrial cancer (EC) is heterogeneous with respect to epidemiology, clinical course, histopathology and tumor biology. Recently, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) network has identified four molecular subtypes with distinct clinical courses by an integrated multi-omics approach. These subtypes are of critical importance in the clinical management of EC. However, determination of TCGA molecular subtypes requires a complex methodological approach that is resource intensive and difficult to implement in diagnostic routine procedures. In this context, Talhouk et al. reported the precise determination of modified subtypes based on molecular surrogates obtained by a two-method approach comprising immunohistochemistry and DNA-sequence analysis (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer; ProMisE). In this study, we aimed to identify EC molecular subtypes in analogy to TCGA and ProMisE applying an innovative whole exome-sequencing (WES) based single-method approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>WES was performed in a cohort comprising N = 114 EC patients. WES data were analyzed using the oncology treatment decision support software MH Guide (Molecular Health, Heidelberg, Germany) and EC molecular subtypes in analogy to TCGA and ProMisE were determined. Results from both classifications were compared regarding their prognostic values using overall survival and progression-free survival analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applying a single-method WES-approach, EC molecular subtypes analogue to TCGA and ProMisE were identified in the study cohort. The surrogate marker-analogue classification precisely identified high-risk and low-risk EC, whereas the TCGA-analogue classification failed to obtain significant prognostic values in this regard.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data demonstrate that determination of EC molecular subtypes analogue to TCGA and ProMisE is feasible by using a single-method WES approach. Within our EC cohort, prognostic implications were only reliably provided by applying the surrogate marker-analogue approach. Designation of molecular subtypes in EC will be increasingly important in routine clinical practice. Thus, the single-method WES approach provides an important simple tool to tailor therapeutic decisions in EC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of endometrial cancer molecular subtypes using a whole exome-sequencing based single-method approach.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Mustea, Damian J Ralser, Eva K Egger, Ulrike Ziehm, Sonia Vivas, Stephan Brock, David Jackson, Mateja Condic, Marc-A Rauschendorf, Patrick Würfel, Frank Dombrowski, Lucia A Otten, Pengming Sun, Anna Laib, Miguel Cubas Cordova, Rahel Hartmann, Martin A Stein, Dominique Koensgen, Matthias B Stope\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-024-05901-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Endometrial cancer (EC) is heterogeneous with respect to epidemiology, clinical course, histopathology and tumor biology. Recently, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) network has identified four molecular subtypes with distinct clinical courses by an integrated multi-omics approach. These subtypes are of critical importance in the clinical management of EC. However, determination of TCGA molecular subtypes requires a complex methodological approach that is resource intensive and difficult to implement in diagnostic routine procedures. In this context, Talhouk et al. reported the precise determination of modified subtypes based on molecular surrogates obtained by a two-method approach comprising immunohistochemistry and DNA-sequence analysis (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer; ProMisE). In this study, we aimed to identify EC molecular subtypes in analogy to TCGA and ProMisE applying an innovative whole exome-sequencing (WES) based single-method approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>WES was performed in a cohort comprising N = 114 EC patients. WES data were analyzed using the oncology treatment decision support software MH Guide (Molecular Health, Heidelberg, Germany) and EC molecular subtypes in analogy to TCGA and ProMisE were determined. Results from both classifications were compared regarding their prognostic values using overall survival and progression-free survival analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applying a single-method WES-approach, EC molecular subtypes analogue to TCGA and ProMisE were identified in the study cohort. The surrogate marker-analogue classification precisely identified high-risk and low-risk EC, whereas the TCGA-analogue classification failed to obtain significant prognostic values in this regard.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data demonstrate that determination of EC molecular subtypes analogue to TCGA and ProMisE is feasible by using a single-method WES approach. Within our EC cohort, prognostic implications were only reliably provided by applying the surrogate marker-analogue approach. Designation of molecular subtypes in EC will be increasingly important in routine clinical practice. Thus, the single-method WES approach provides an important simple tool to tailor therapeutic decisions in EC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272736/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05901-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05901-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:子宫内膜癌(EC)在流行病学、临床病程、组织病理学和肿瘤生物学方面具有异质性。最近,癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)网络通过综合多组学方法确定了四种具有不同临床过程的分子亚型。这些亚型对EC的临床治疗至关重要。然而,TCGA分子亚型的确定需要复杂的方法学,资源密集且难以在常规诊断程序中实施。在这种情况下,Talhouk 等人报道了基于免疫组化和 DNA 序列分析(Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer;ProMisE)两种方法获得的分子代用品精确确定改良亚型的方法。在本研究中,我们采用创新的基于全外显子组测序(WES)的单一方法,旨在确定与TCGA和ProMisE类似的EC分子亚型:方法:在由N = 114名EC患者组成的队列中进行WES分析。使用肿瘤治疗决策支持软件 MH Guide(Molecular Health,德国海德堡)分析了 WES 数据,并确定了与 TCGA 和 ProMisE 类似的欧共体分子亚型。使用总生存期和无进展生存期分析比较了两种分类的预后价值:结果:采用单一方法 WES 方法,在研究队列中确定了与 TCGA 和 ProMisE 类似的心肌梗死分子亚型。代用标记物-类似物分类能准确识别高危和低危EC,而TCGA-类似物分类在这方面未能获得显著的预后价值:我们的数据表明,使用单一方法 WES 可以确定类似 TCGA 和 ProMisE 的 EC 分子亚型。在我们的心血管疾病队列中,只有应用替代标记物类似方法才能可靠地提供预后影响。在常规临床实践中,EC 分子亚型的确定将越来越重要。因此,单一方法WES方法为制定EC治疗决策提供了一个重要的简单工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Determination of endometrial cancer molecular subtypes using a whole exome-sequencing based single-method approach.

Determination of endometrial cancer molecular subtypes using a whole exome-sequencing based single-method approach.

Aim: Endometrial cancer (EC) is heterogeneous with respect to epidemiology, clinical course, histopathology and tumor biology. Recently, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) network has identified four molecular subtypes with distinct clinical courses by an integrated multi-omics approach. These subtypes are of critical importance in the clinical management of EC. However, determination of TCGA molecular subtypes requires a complex methodological approach that is resource intensive and difficult to implement in diagnostic routine procedures. In this context, Talhouk et al. reported the precise determination of modified subtypes based on molecular surrogates obtained by a two-method approach comprising immunohistochemistry and DNA-sequence analysis (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer; ProMisE). In this study, we aimed to identify EC molecular subtypes in analogy to TCGA and ProMisE applying an innovative whole exome-sequencing (WES) based single-method approach.

Methods: WES was performed in a cohort comprising N = 114 EC patients. WES data were analyzed using the oncology treatment decision support software MH Guide (Molecular Health, Heidelberg, Germany) and EC molecular subtypes in analogy to TCGA and ProMisE were determined. Results from both classifications were compared regarding their prognostic values using overall survival and progression-free survival analyses.

Results: Applying a single-method WES-approach, EC molecular subtypes analogue to TCGA and ProMisE were identified in the study cohort. The surrogate marker-analogue classification precisely identified high-risk and low-risk EC, whereas the TCGA-analogue classification failed to obtain significant prognostic values in this regard.

Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that determination of EC molecular subtypes analogue to TCGA and ProMisE is feasible by using a single-method WES approach. Within our EC cohort, prognostic implications were only reliably provided by applying the surrogate marker-analogue approach. Designation of molecular subtypes in EC will be increasingly important in routine clinical practice. Thus, the single-method WES approach provides an important simple tool to tailor therapeutic decisions in EC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信