将拉曼光谱法作为一种替代性快速微生物生物负载测试方法,用于连续、自动检测生物制药药物生产过程中的污染。

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Erin M Masucci, James E Hauschild, Helena M Gisler, Erin M Lester, Karin M Balss
{"title":"将拉曼光谱法作为一种替代性快速微生物生物负载测试方法,用于连续、自动检测生物制药药物生产过程中的污染。","authors":"Erin M Masucci, James E Hauschild, Helena M Gisler, Erin M Lester, Karin M Balss","doi":"10.1093/jambio/lxae188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate an in-line Raman method capable of detecting accidental microbial contamination in pharmaceutical vessels, such as bioreactors producing monoclonal antibodies via cell culture.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The Raman method consists of a multivariate model built from Raman spectra collected in-line during reduced-scale bioreactor batches producing a monoclonal antibody, as well as a reduced-scale process with intentional spiking of representative compendial method microorganisms (n = 4). The orthogonal partial least squares regression discriminant analysis model (OPLS-DA) area under the curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity were 0.96, 0.99, and 0.95, respectively. Furthermore, the model successfully detected contamination in an accidentally contaminated manufacturing-scale batch. In all cases, the time to detection (TTD) for Raman was superior compared to offline, traditional microbiological culturing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Raman OPLS-DA method met acceptance criteria for equivalent decision making to be considered a viable alternative to the compendial method for in-process bioburden testing. The in-line method is automated, non-destructive, and provides a continuous assessment of bioburden compared to an offline compendial method, which is manual, results in loss of product, and in practice is only collected once daily and requires 3-5 days for enumeration.</p>","PeriodicalId":15036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Raman spectroscopy as an alternative rapid microbial bioburden test method for continuous, automated detection of contamination in biopharmaceutical drug substance manufacturing.\",\"authors\":\"Erin M Masucci, James E Hauschild, Helena M Gisler, Erin M Lester, Karin M Balss\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jambio/lxae188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate an in-line Raman method capable of detecting accidental microbial contamination in pharmaceutical vessels, such as bioreactors producing monoclonal antibodies via cell culture.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The Raman method consists of a multivariate model built from Raman spectra collected in-line during reduced-scale bioreactor batches producing a monoclonal antibody, as well as a reduced-scale process with intentional spiking of representative compendial method microorganisms (n = 4). The orthogonal partial least squares regression discriminant analysis model (OPLS-DA) area under the curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity were 0.96, 0.99, and 0.95, respectively. Furthermore, the model successfully detected contamination in an accidentally contaminated manufacturing-scale batch. In all cases, the time to detection (TTD) for Raman was superior compared to offline, traditional microbiological culturing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Raman OPLS-DA method met acceptance criteria for equivalent decision making to be considered a viable alternative to the compendial method for in-process bioburden testing. The in-line method is automated, non-destructive, and provides a continuous assessment of bioburden compared to an offline compendial method, which is manual, results in loss of product, and in practice is only collected once daily and requires 3-5 days for enumeration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxae188\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxae188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究一种能够检测制药容器(如通过细胞培养生产单克隆抗体的生物反应器)中意外微生物污染的在线拉曼方法:拉曼方法由一个多变量模型组成,该模型来自于在生产单克隆抗体的小规模生物反应器批次中在线采集的拉曼光谱,以及在生产小规模过程中有意添加的具有代表性的药典方法微生物(n = 4)。正交偏最小二乘回归判别分析模型(OPLS-DA)的曲线下面积(AUC)、特异性和灵敏度分别为 0.96、0.99 和 0.95。此外,该模型还成功检测出一个意外污染的生产规模批次中的污染。在所有情况下,拉曼检测时间(TTD)都优于离线传统微生物培养法:结论:拉曼 OPLS-DA 方法符合等效决策的验收标准,可替代药典方法用于流程内生物负载测试。与离线药典方法相比,在线方法是自动化的、无损的,可对生物负载进行连续评估,而离线药典方法是手动的,会造成产品损失,而且实际上每天只能收集一次,需要 3-5 天的时间进行计数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Raman spectroscopy as an alternative rapid microbial bioburden test method for continuous, automated detection of contamination in biopharmaceutical drug substance manufacturing.

Aims: To investigate an in-line Raman method capable of detecting accidental microbial contamination in pharmaceutical vessels, such as bioreactors producing monoclonal antibodies via cell culture.

Methods and results: The Raman method consists of a multivariate model built from Raman spectra collected in-line during reduced-scale bioreactor batches producing a monoclonal antibody, as well as a reduced-scale process with intentional spiking of representative compendial method microorganisms (n = 4). The orthogonal partial least squares regression discriminant analysis model (OPLS-DA) area under the curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity were 0.96, 0.99, and 0.95, respectively. Furthermore, the model successfully detected contamination in an accidentally contaminated manufacturing-scale batch. In all cases, the time to detection (TTD) for Raman was superior compared to offline, traditional microbiological culturing.

Conclusions: The Raman OPLS-DA method met acceptance criteria for equivalent decision making to be considered a viable alternative to the compendial method for in-process bioburden testing. The in-line method is automated, non-destructive, and provides a continuous assessment of bioburden compared to an offline compendial method, which is manual, results in loss of product, and in practice is only collected once daily and requires 3-5 days for enumeration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Journal of Applied Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.50%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信