通过家长教育提高白喉、百日咳、破伤风三联疫苗第二加强剂量的接种率:群组随机方法。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Indian pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-10-15 Epub Date: 2024-07-23
Rangasai Anirudh Neeli, Amit Kumar Satapathy, Arvind Kumar Singh, Bhagirathi Dwibedi
{"title":"通过家长教育提高白喉、百日咳、破伤风三联疫苗第二加强剂量的接种率:群组随机方法。","authors":"Rangasai Anirudh Neeli, Amit Kumar Satapathy, Arvind Kumar Singh, Bhagirathi Dwibedi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effect of a single clinic-based educational intervention session on parents of children aged 4.5 to 5.5 years on improving the coverage of a second booster dose of the DPT vaccine. The secondary objective was to assess the coverage of second booster dose of the DPT vaccine among children aged > 6 years and to learn about the reasons behind such dropouts, if any.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, a cross-sectional study was conducted among children aged > 6 years who were attending the pediatric OPD or IPD to determine the coverage of the second booster dose of DPT vaccine and possible reasons for dropout.   This was followed by a clustered randomized trial evaluating the effect of an educational intervention (clinic-based, single session) among parents of children aged 4.5 to 5.5 years for improving second DPT booster coverage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 384 children were enrolled in the first phase, of which 233 (60.68%) were vaccinated. Subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the vaccine coverage between children from tribal-dominant and non-tribal-dominant districts (45.10% vs 63.06%, P = 0.01). Educational intervention resulted in higher vaccination coverage (77.24%) compared to 71.43% in the control arm (P = 0.300).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study showed low coverage for second booster of DPT vaccine. With educational intervention, the target immunization coverage could be attained early which has implications for reducing childhood morbidity due to vaccine-preventable diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":13291,"journal":{"name":"Indian pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"953-959"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Coverage of Second Booster Dose of DPT Vaccine Coverage With Parental Education: A Cluster Randomized Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Rangasai Anirudh Neeli, Amit Kumar Satapathy, Arvind Kumar Singh, Bhagirathi Dwibedi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effect of a single clinic-based educational intervention session on parents of children aged 4.5 to 5.5 years on improving the coverage of a second booster dose of the DPT vaccine. The secondary objective was to assess the coverage of second booster dose of the DPT vaccine among children aged > 6 years and to learn about the reasons behind such dropouts, if any.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, a cross-sectional study was conducted among children aged > 6 years who were attending the pediatric OPD or IPD to determine the coverage of the second booster dose of DPT vaccine and possible reasons for dropout.   This was followed by a clustered randomized trial evaluating the effect of an educational intervention (clinic-based, single session) among parents of children aged 4.5 to 5.5 years for improving second DPT booster coverage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 384 children were enrolled in the first phase, of which 233 (60.68%) were vaccinated. Subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the vaccine coverage between children from tribal-dominant and non-tribal-dominant districts (45.10% vs 63.06%, P = 0.01). Educational intervention resulted in higher vaccination coverage (77.24%) compared to 71.43% in the control arm (P = 0.300).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study showed low coverage for second booster of DPT vaccine. With educational intervention, the target immunization coverage could be attained early which has implications for reducing childhood morbidity due to vaccine-preventable diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"953-959\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估对 4.5 至 5.5 岁儿童的家长进行一次诊所教育干预对提高白百破疫苗第二针加强剂接种率的效果。次要目标是评估 6 岁以上儿童接种第二剂白百破疫苗的覆盖率,并了解辍种的原因(如果有的话):研究分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段,对在儿科门诊或综合门诊就诊的 6 岁以上儿童进行了横断面研究,以确定白百破疫苗第二剂加强接种的覆盖率和辍种的可能原因。随后又进行了一项分组随机试验,评估在 4.5 至 5.5 岁儿童的家长中开展教育干预(以门诊为基础,单次课程)的效果,以提供咨询和视听信息,提高白喉、百日咳、破伤风三联疫苗第二次加强接种的覆盖率:第一阶段共有 384 名儿童参加,其中 233 人(60.68%)接种了疫苗。分组分析表明,部落占主导地位的地区和非部落占主导地位的地区的儿童在疫苗接种覆盖率上存在明显差异(45.10% vs 63.06%,P = 0.01)。教育干预的疫苗接种率(77.24%)高于对照组的 71.43%(P = 0.300):本研究显示,白百破疫苗第二加强针的接种率较低。通过教育干预,可以尽早达到目标免疫接种覆盖率,这对降低疫苗可预防疾病导致的儿童发病率具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Coverage of Second Booster Dose of DPT Vaccine Coverage With Parental Education: A Cluster Randomized Approach.

Objective: To assess the effect of a single clinic-based educational intervention session on parents of children aged 4.5 to 5.5 years on improving the coverage of a second booster dose of the DPT vaccine. The secondary objective was to assess the coverage of second booster dose of the DPT vaccine among children aged > 6 years and to learn about the reasons behind such dropouts, if any.

Methods: The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, a cross-sectional study was conducted among children aged > 6 years who were attending the pediatric OPD or IPD to determine the coverage of the second booster dose of DPT vaccine and possible reasons for dropout.   This was followed by a clustered randomized trial evaluating the effect of an educational intervention (clinic-based, single session) among parents of children aged 4.5 to 5.5 years for improving second DPT booster coverage.

Results: A total of 384 children were enrolled in the first phase, of which 233 (60.68%) were vaccinated. Subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the vaccine coverage between children from tribal-dominant and non-tribal-dominant districts (45.10% vs 63.06%, P = 0.01). Educational intervention resulted in higher vaccination coverage (77.24%) compared to 71.43% in the control arm (P = 0.300).

Conclusion: The current study showed low coverage for second booster of DPT vaccine. With educational intervention, the target immunization coverage could be attained early which has implications for reducing childhood morbidity due to vaccine-preventable diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian pediatrics
Indian pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
344
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The general objective of Indian Pediatrics is "To promote the science and practice of Pediatrics." An important guiding principle has been the simultaneous need to inform, educate and entertain the target audience. The specific key objectives are: -To publish original, relevant, well researched peer reviewed articles on issues related to child health. -To provide continuing education to support informed clinical decisions and research. -To foster responsible and balanced debate on controversial issues that affect child health, including non-clinical areas such as medical education, ethics, law, environment and economics. -To achieve the highest level of ethical medical journalism and to produce a publication that is timely, credible and enjoyable to read.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信