光子计数探测器 CT 和双能量 CT 系统放射组学的鲁棒性:纹理模型研究。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10976-1
Lan Zhu, Haipeng Dong, Jing Sun, Lingyun Wang, Yue Xing, Yangfan Hu, Junjie Lu, Jiarui Yang, Jingshen Chu, Chao Yan, Fei Yuan, Jingyu Zhong
{"title":"光子计数探测器 CT 和双能量 CT 系统放射组学的鲁棒性:纹理模型研究。","authors":"Lan Zhu, Haipeng Dong, Jing Sun, Lingyun Wang, Yue Xing, Yangfan Hu, Junjie Lu, Jiarui Yang, Jingshen Chu, Chao Yan, Fei Yuan, Jingyu Zhong","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10976-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the robustness of radiomics features among photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A texture phantom consisting of twenty-eight materials was scanned with one PCD-CT and four DECT systems (dual-source, rapid kV-switching, dual-layer, and sequential scanning) at three dose levels twice. Thirty sets of virtual monochromatic images at 70 keV were reconstructed. Regions of interest were delineated for each material with a rigid registration. Ninety-three radiomics were extracted per PyRadiomics. The test-retest repeatability between repeated scans was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. The intra-system reproducibility between dose levels, and inter-system reproducibility within the same dose level, were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Inter-system variability among five scanners was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test-retest repeatability analysis presented that 97.1% of features were repeatable between scan-rescans. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.945 ± 0.079 and 0.945 ± 0.079 for intra-system reproducibility, respectively, and 86.0% and 85.7% of features were with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90, respectively, between different dose levels. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.157 ± 0.174 and 0.157 ± 0.174 for inter-system reproducibility, respectively, and none of the features were with ICC > 0.90 or CCC > 0.90 within the same dose level. The inter-system variability suggested that 6.5% and 12.8% of features were with CV < 10% and QCD < 10%, respectively, among five CT systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The radiomics features were non-reproducible with significant variability in values among different CT techniques.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Radiomics features are non-reproducible with significant variability in values among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems, necessitating careful attention to improve the cross-system generalizability of radiomic features before implementation of radiomics analysis in clinical routine.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>CT radiomics stability should be guaranteed before the implementation in the clinical routine. Radiomics robustness was on a low level among photon-counting detectors and dual-energy CT techniques. Limited inter-system robustness of radiomic features may impact the generalizability of models.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"871-884"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robustness of radiomics among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems: a texture phantom study.\",\"authors\":\"Lan Zhu, Haipeng Dong, Jing Sun, Lingyun Wang, Yue Xing, Yangfan Hu, Junjie Lu, Jiarui Yang, Jingshen Chu, Chao Yan, Fei Yuan, Jingyu Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-024-10976-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the robustness of radiomics features among photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A texture phantom consisting of twenty-eight materials was scanned with one PCD-CT and four DECT systems (dual-source, rapid kV-switching, dual-layer, and sequential scanning) at three dose levels twice. Thirty sets of virtual monochromatic images at 70 keV were reconstructed. Regions of interest were delineated for each material with a rigid registration. Ninety-three radiomics were extracted per PyRadiomics. The test-retest repeatability between repeated scans was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. The intra-system reproducibility between dose levels, and inter-system reproducibility within the same dose level, were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Inter-system variability among five scanners was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test-retest repeatability analysis presented that 97.1% of features were repeatable between scan-rescans. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.945 ± 0.079 and 0.945 ± 0.079 for intra-system reproducibility, respectively, and 86.0% and 85.7% of features were with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90, respectively, between different dose levels. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.157 ± 0.174 and 0.157 ± 0.174 for inter-system reproducibility, respectively, and none of the features were with ICC > 0.90 or CCC > 0.90 within the same dose level. The inter-system variability suggested that 6.5% and 12.8% of features were with CV < 10% and QCD < 10%, respectively, among five CT systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The radiomics features were non-reproducible with significant variability in values among different CT techniques.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Radiomics features are non-reproducible with significant variability in values among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems, necessitating careful attention to improve the cross-system generalizability of radiomic features before implementation of radiomics analysis in clinical routine.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>CT radiomics stability should be guaranteed before the implementation in the clinical routine. Radiomics robustness was on a low level among photon-counting detectors and dual-energy CT techniques. Limited inter-system robustness of radiomic features may impact the generalizability of models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"871-884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782343/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10976-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10976-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估光子计数探测器 CT(PCD-CT)和双能量 CT(DECT)系统的放射组学特征的稳健性:用一种 PCD-CT 和四种 DECT 系统(双源、快速 kV 切换、双层和顺序扫描)在三种剂量水平下对由 28 种材料组成的纹理模型进行了两次扫描。重建了 30 组 70 千伏的虚拟单色图像。每种材料的感兴趣区都是通过刚性配准来划定的。每个 PyRadiomics 提取了 93 个放射组。通过布兰-阿尔特曼分析评估了重复扫描之间的测试重复性。通过类内相关系数(ICC)和一致性相关系数(CCC)评估了不同剂量水平的系统内重复性和同一剂量水平的系统间重复性。五台扫描仪之间的系统间变异性通过变异系数(CV)和四分位离散系数(QCD)进行评估:结果:测试-重复性分析表明,97.1%的特征在扫描-扫描之间具有重复性。系统内重复性的平均±标准偏差 ICC 和 CCC 分别为 0.945 ± 0.079 和 0.945 ± 0.079,不同剂量水平之间分别有 86.0% 和 85.7% 的特征 ICC > 0.90 和 CCC > 0.90。系统间重现性的 ICC 和 CCC 平均值(± 标准差)分别为 0.157 ± 0.174 和 0.157 ± 0.174,在同一剂量水平内,没有任何特征的 ICC > 0.90 或 CCC > 0.90。系统间变异性表明,分别有 6.5% 和 12.8% 的特征具有 CV:放射组学特征是不可再现的,不同 CT 技术之间的数值存在显著差异:放射组学特征不可再现,不同光子计数探测器 CT 和双能量 CT 系统的特征值差异显著,因此在临床常规实施放射组学分析之前,有必要仔细关注提高放射组学特征的跨系统通用性:要点:在临床常规应用之前,应确保 CT 放射组学的稳定性。光子计数探测器和双能量 CT 技术的放射组学稳健性较低。放射组学特征的系统间稳健性有限,可能会影响模型的通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Robustness of radiomics among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems: a texture phantom study.

Robustness of radiomics among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems: a texture phantom study.

Objectives: To evaluate the robustness of radiomics features among photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) systems.

Methods: A texture phantom consisting of twenty-eight materials was scanned with one PCD-CT and four DECT systems (dual-source, rapid kV-switching, dual-layer, and sequential scanning) at three dose levels twice. Thirty sets of virtual monochromatic images at 70 keV were reconstructed. Regions of interest were delineated for each material with a rigid registration. Ninety-three radiomics were extracted per PyRadiomics. The test-retest repeatability between repeated scans was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. The intra-system reproducibility between dose levels, and inter-system reproducibility within the same dose level, were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Inter-system variability among five scanners was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD).

Results: The test-retest repeatability analysis presented that 97.1% of features were repeatable between scan-rescans. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.945 ± 0.079 and 0.945 ± 0.079 for intra-system reproducibility, respectively, and 86.0% and 85.7% of features were with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90, respectively, between different dose levels. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.157 ± 0.174 and 0.157 ± 0.174 for inter-system reproducibility, respectively, and none of the features were with ICC > 0.90 or CCC > 0.90 within the same dose level. The inter-system variability suggested that 6.5% and 12.8% of features were with CV < 10% and QCD < 10%, respectively, among five CT systems.

Conclusion: The radiomics features were non-reproducible with significant variability in values among different CT techniques.

Clinical relevance statement: Radiomics features are non-reproducible with significant variability in values among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems, necessitating careful attention to improve the cross-system generalizability of radiomic features before implementation of radiomics analysis in clinical routine.

Key points: CT radiomics stability should be guaranteed before the implementation in the clinical routine. Radiomics robustness was on a low level among photon-counting detectors and dual-energy CT techniques. Limited inter-system robustness of radiomic features may impact the generalizability of models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信