Alicia Cárceles Montoya, Carlos Enrique Monera Lucas, Claudia Patricia Tarazona Jaimes, Daniel Romero Valero, Alejandro Moya Martínez, José Juan Martínez Toldos
{"title":"用于测量眼压的 HNT-1P Huvitz 非接触式眼压计的可比性分析。","authors":"Alicia Cárceles Montoya, Carlos Enrique Monera Lucas, Claudia Patricia Tarazona Jaimes, Daniel Romero Valero, Alejandro Moya Martínez, José Juan Martínez Toldos","doi":"10.1177/11206721241263624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic validity of the HNT-1P non-contact tonometer (Huvitz) as a tool for accurately measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with healthy eyes, compared to the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), which is the Gold Standard method for measurement of IOP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, descriptive, transversal study using 148 eyes of 74 healthy patients without a diagnosis of glaucoma or other ophthalmological diseases. Three measurements of IOP were taken in each eye, using three tonometers: HNT-1P, ICR100, and GAT. The median IOP (quartiles) and mean IOP (SD) its statistical significance were calculated, and comparisons were made between the mean and median IOP values found in three groups: GAT-HNT, GAT-ICR, and HNT-ICR. The difference in mean and median IOP was analyzed in each of the three study groups, and its statistical significance and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median IOP with HNT-1P was statistically significantly lower than the median IOP with GAT, (1.1 mmHg, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The median IOP with HNT-1P was also lower than the median IOP with ICR100. As an additional result, the median IOP with GAT was lower than the median IOP with ICR. The CCC was moderate for HNT-ICR (0.72) and low for GAT-HNT and GAT-ICR (0.43 and 0.38, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HNT-1P (Huvitz) provides statistically significantly lower IOP values than those obtained with GAT. HNT-1P could be used for screening of ocular hypertension in postoperative patients. The IOP measurement obtained with HNT-1P should be confirmed with GAT. HNT-1P yields lower IOP values than those obtained with ICR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"544-550"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparability analysis of the HNT-1P Huvitz non contact tonometer for the measurement of intraocular pressure.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Cárceles Montoya, Carlos Enrique Monera Lucas, Claudia Patricia Tarazona Jaimes, Daniel Romero Valero, Alejandro Moya Martínez, José Juan Martínez Toldos\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11206721241263624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic validity of the HNT-1P non-contact tonometer (Huvitz) as a tool for accurately measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with healthy eyes, compared to the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), which is the Gold Standard method for measurement of IOP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, descriptive, transversal study using 148 eyes of 74 healthy patients without a diagnosis of glaucoma or other ophthalmological diseases. Three measurements of IOP were taken in each eye, using three tonometers: HNT-1P, ICR100, and GAT. The median IOP (quartiles) and mean IOP (SD) its statistical significance were calculated, and comparisons were made between the mean and median IOP values found in three groups: GAT-HNT, GAT-ICR, and HNT-ICR. The difference in mean and median IOP was analyzed in each of the three study groups, and its statistical significance and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median IOP with HNT-1P was statistically significantly lower than the median IOP with GAT, (1.1 mmHg, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The median IOP with HNT-1P was also lower than the median IOP with ICR100. As an additional result, the median IOP with GAT was lower than the median IOP with ICR. The CCC was moderate for HNT-ICR (0.72) and low for GAT-HNT and GAT-ICR (0.43 and 0.38, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HNT-1P (Huvitz) provides statistically significantly lower IOP values than those obtained with GAT. HNT-1P could be used for screening of ocular hypertension in postoperative patients. The IOP measurement obtained with HNT-1P should be confirmed with GAT. HNT-1P yields lower IOP values than those obtained with ICR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"544-550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241263624\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241263624","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估 HNT-1P 非接触式眼压计(Huvitz)作为准确测量健康眼病患者眼压(IOP)的工具,与测量 IOP 的黄金标准方法--戈德曼眼压计(GAT)相比的诊断有效性:观察性、描述性、横向研究,使用了 74 名未确诊青光眼或其他眼科疾病的健康患者的 148 只眼睛。每只眼睛使用三种眼压计测量三次眼压:HNT-1P、ICR100 和 GAT。计算了具有统计学意义的中位眼压(四分位)和平均眼压(标清),并对三组的平均眼压值和中位眼压值进行了比较:GAT-HNT、GAT-ICR 和 HNT-ICR。分析了三个研究组的平均眼压和中位眼压的差异,并计算了其统计学意义和一致性相关系数(CCC):结果:HNT-1P 的中位眼压在统计学上明显低于 GAT 的中位眼压(1.1 mmHg,p 结论:HNT-1P 的中位眼压明显低于 GAT 的中位眼压):从统计学角度看,HNT-1P(Huvitz)的眼压值明显低于 GAT。HNT-1P 可用于筛查术后患者的眼压过高。使用 HNT-1P 测得的眼压值应通过 GAT 加以确认。HNT-1P 得出的眼压值低于 ICR 得出的眼压值。
Comparability analysis of the HNT-1P Huvitz non contact tonometer for the measurement of intraocular pressure.
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic validity of the HNT-1P non-contact tonometer (Huvitz) as a tool for accurately measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with healthy eyes, compared to the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), which is the Gold Standard method for measurement of IOP.
Methods: Observational, descriptive, transversal study using 148 eyes of 74 healthy patients without a diagnosis of glaucoma or other ophthalmological diseases. Three measurements of IOP were taken in each eye, using three tonometers: HNT-1P, ICR100, and GAT. The median IOP (quartiles) and mean IOP (SD) its statistical significance were calculated, and comparisons were made between the mean and median IOP values found in three groups: GAT-HNT, GAT-ICR, and HNT-ICR. The difference in mean and median IOP was analyzed in each of the three study groups, and its statistical significance and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were calculated.
Results: The median IOP with HNT-1P was statistically significantly lower than the median IOP with GAT, (1.1 mmHg, p < 0.001). The median IOP with HNT-1P was also lower than the median IOP with ICR100. As an additional result, the median IOP with GAT was lower than the median IOP with ICR. The CCC was moderate for HNT-ICR (0.72) and low for GAT-HNT and GAT-ICR (0.43 and 0.38, respectively).
Conclusions: HNT-1P (Huvitz) provides statistically significantly lower IOP values than those obtained with GAT. HNT-1P could be used for screening of ocular hypertension in postoperative patients. The IOP measurement obtained with HNT-1P should be confirmed with GAT. HNT-1P yields lower IOP values than those obtained with ICR.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.