根据奥马哈问题分类系统,制定了老年肝移植患者家庭护理的敏感性结果指标体系。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Bin Wang, Xia Huang, Guofang Liu, Taohua Zheng, Hui Lin, Yue Qiao, Wenjuan Sun
{"title":"根据奥马哈问题分类系统,制定了老年肝移植患者家庭护理的敏感性结果指标体系。","authors":"Bin Wang, Xia Huang, Guofang Liu, Taohua Zheng, Hui Lin, Yue Qiao, Wenjuan Sun","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02617-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Based on the Omaha problem classification system, a sensitivity outcome index system for home nursing of elderly liver transplant patients was established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a comprehensive literature review and rigorous application of the Delphi method, a panel of 20 experts completed two rounds of effective letter consultation to obtain expert consensus opinions. The contents of indicators were determined based on this process, and the analytic hierarchy process was employed to confirm the weightage assigned to each indicator. Consequently, we established a sensitivity outcome index system for home care in elderly liver transplant patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effective recovery rate of the questionnaire in two rounds of expert consultation was 100%, and the proportion of experts who gave opinions was 55% and 15%, respectively, indicating that the experts were highly active. The expert authority coefficients were calculated as 0.904 and 0.905, respectively, indicating a high degree of expert authority. In the second round, Kendall's coordination coefficients for primary, secondary, and tertiary indicators were determined to be 0.419, 0.418, and 0.394 (P < 0.001), indicating that expert opinions tended to be consistent. Finally, we established a comprehensive sensitivity outcome index system comprising 4 first-level indexes, 20 s-level indexes, and 72 third-level indexes specifically designed for elderly liver transplantation patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sensitivity outcome index system of home nursing for elderly liver transplant patients can provide theoretical basis for nursing staff to build accurate individualized continuous nursing model.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The sensitivity outcome index system for home care of elderly liver transplant patients was developed based on the Omaha problem classification system.\",\"authors\":\"Bin Wang, Xia Huang, Guofang Liu, Taohua Zheng, Hui Lin, Yue Qiao, Wenjuan Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12911-024-02617-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Based on the Omaha problem classification system, a sensitivity outcome index system for home nursing of elderly liver transplant patients was established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through a comprehensive literature review and rigorous application of the Delphi method, a panel of 20 experts completed two rounds of effective letter consultation to obtain expert consensus opinions. The contents of indicators were determined based on this process, and the analytic hierarchy process was employed to confirm the weightage assigned to each indicator. Consequently, we established a sensitivity outcome index system for home care in elderly liver transplant patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effective recovery rate of the questionnaire in two rounds of expert consultation was 100%, and the proportion of experts who gave opinions was 55% and 15%, respectively, indicating that the experts were highly active. The expert authority coefficients were calculated as 0.904 and 0.905, respectively, indicating a high degree of expert authority. In the second round, Kendall's coordination coefficients for primary, secondary, and tertiary indicators were determined to be 0.419, 0.418, and 0.394 (P < 0.001), indicating that expert opinions tended to be consistent. Finally, we established a comprehensive sensitivity outcome index system comprising 4 first-level indexes, 20 s-level indexes, and 72 third-level indexes specifically designed for elderly liver transplantation patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sensitivity outcome index system of home nursing for elderly liver transplant patients can provide theoretical basis for nursing staff to build accurate individualized continuous nursing model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270964/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02617-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02617-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基于奥马哈问题分类系统,建立老年肝移植患者家庭护理的敏感性结果指标体系:基于奥马哈问题分类系统,建立老年肝移植患者家庭护理的敏感性结果指标体系:方法:通过全面的文献综述和德尔菲法的严格应用,由 20 位专家组成的专家组完成了两轮有效的信件咨询,以获得专家的一致意见。在此基础上确定指标内容,并采用层次分析法确认各指标的权重。最终,我们建立了老年肝移植患者家庭护理的敏感性结果指标体系:两轮专家咨询问卷的有效回收率为 100%,提出意见的专家比例分别为 55%和 15%,专家积极性较高。经计算,专家权威系数分别为 0.904 和 0.905,表明专家权威性较高。在第二轮中,一级指标、二级指标和三级指标的 Kendall 协调系数分别确定为 0.419、0.418 和 0.394(P 结论:一级指标、二级指标和三级指标的 Kendall 协调系数分别为 0.419、0.418 和 0.394:老年肝移植患者居家护理敏感性结果指标体系可为护理人员构建精准的个体化连续护理模式提供理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The sensitivity outcome index system for home care of elderly liver transplant patients was developed based on the Omaha problem classification system.

Objective: Based on the Omaha problem classification system, a sensitivity outcome index system for home nursing of elderly liver transplant patients was established.

Methods: Through a comprehensive literature review and rigorous application of the Delphi method, a panel of 20 experts completed two rounds of effective letter consultation to obtain expert consensus opinions. The contents of indicators were determined based on this process, and the analytic hierarchy process was employed to confirm the weightage assigned to each indicator. Consequently, we established a sensitivity outcome index system for home care in elderly liver transplant patients.

Results: The effective recovery rate of the questionnaire in two rounds of expert consultation was 100%, and the proportion of experts who gave opinions was 55% and 15%, respectively, indicating that the experts were highly active. The expert authority coefficients were calculated as 0.904 and 0.905, respectively, indicating a high degree of expert authority. In the second round, Kendall's coordination coefficients for primary, secondary, and tertiary indicators were determined to be 0.419, 0.418, and 0.394 (P < 0.001), indicating that expert opinions tended to be consistent. Finally, we established a comprehensive sensitivity outcome index system comprising 4 first-level indexes, 20 s-level indexes, and 72 third-level indexes specifically designed for elderly liver transplantation patients.

Conclusion: The sensitivity outcome index system of home nursing for elderly liver transplant patients can provide theoretical basis for nursing staff to build accurate individualized continuous nursing model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信