Tomohiro Ueda, Kosuke Yamashita, Retsu Kawazoe, Yuta Sayawaki, Yoshiki Morisawa, Ryosuke Kamezaki, Ryuji Ikeda, Shinya Shiraishi, Yoshikazu Uchiyama, Shigeki Ito
{"title":"利用深度学习直接脑18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层成像衰减和高分辨率校正方法的可行性。","authors":"Tomohiro Ueda, Kosuke Yamashita, Retsu Kawazoe, Yuta Sayawaki, Yoshiki Morisawa, Ryosuke Kamezaki, Ryuji Ikeda, Shinya Shiraishi, Yoshikazu Uchiyama, Shigeki Ito","doi":"10.22038/AOJNMB.2024.74875.1522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop the following three attenuation correction (AC) methods for brain <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET), using deep learning, and to ascertain their precision levels: (i) indirect method; (ii) direct method; and (iii) direct and high-resolution correction (direct+HRC) method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 53 patients who underwent cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) and 27 patients who underwent cranial MRI, CT, and PET. After fusion of the magnetic resonance, CT, and PET images, resampling was performed to standardize the field of view and matrix size and prepare the data set. In the indirect method, synthetic CT (SCT) images were generated, whereas in the direct and direct+HRC methods, a U-net structure was used to generate AC images. In the indirect method, attenuation correction was performed using SCT images generated from MRI findings using U-net instead of CT images. In the direct and direct+HRC methods, AC images were generated directly from non-AC images using U-net, followed by image evaluation. The precision levels of AC images generated using the indirect and direct methods were compared based on the normalized mean squared error (NMSE) and structural similarity (SSIM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual inspection revealed no difference between the AC images prepared using CT-based attenuation correction and those prepared using the three methods. The NMSE increased in the order indirect, direct, and direct+HRC methods, with values of 0.281×10<sup>-3</sup>, 4.62×10<sup>-3</sup>, and 12.7×10<sup>-3</sup>, respectively. Moreover, the SSIM of the direct+HRC method was 0.975.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The direct+HRC method enables accurate attenuation without CT exposure and high-resolution correction without dedicated correction programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8503,"journal":{"name":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","volume":"12 2","pages":"108-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11263769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of direct brain <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography attenuation and high-resolution correction methods using deep learning.\",\"authors\":\"Tomohiro Ueda, Kosuke Yamashita, Retsu Kawazoe, Yuta Sayawaki, Yoshiki Morisawa, Ryosuke Kamezaki, Ryuji Ikeda, Shinya Shiraishi, Yoshikazu Uchiyama, Shigeki Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/AOJNMB.2024.74875.1522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop the following three attenuation correction (AC) methods for brain <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET), using deep learning, and to ascertain their precision levels: (i) indirect method; (ii) direct method; and (iii) direct and high-resolution correction (direct+HRC) method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 53 patients who underwent cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) and 27 patients who underwent cranial MRI, CT, and PET. After fusion of the magnetic resonance, CT, and PET images, resampling was performed to standardize the field of view and matrix size and prepare the data set. In the indirect method, synthetic CT (SCT) images were generated, whereas in the direct and direct+HRC methods, a U-net structure was used to generate AC images. In the indirect method, attenuation correction was performed using SCT images generated from MRI findings using U-net instead of CT images. In the direct and direct+HRC methods, AC images were generated directly from non-AC images using U-net, followed by image evaluation. The precision levels of AC images generated using the indirect and direct methods were compared based on the normalized mean squared error (NMSE) and structural similarity (SSIM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual inspection revealed no difference between the AC images prepared using CT-based attenuation correction and those prepared using the three methods. The NMSE increased in the order indirect, direct, and direct+HRC methods, with values of 0.281×10<sup>-3</sup>, 4.62×10<sup>-3</sup>, and 12.7×10<sup>-3</sup>, respectively. Moreover, the SSIM of the direct+HRC method was 0.975.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The direct+HRC method enables accurate attenuation without CT exposure and high-resolution correction without dedicated correction programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"108-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11263769/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2024.74875.1522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2024.74875.1522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:利用深度学习开发以下三种脑18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层成像(PET)衰减校正(AC)方法,并确定其精确度水平:(i) 间接法;(ii) 直接法;(iii) 直接和高分辨率校正(直接+HRC)法:我们纳入了 53 名接受头颅磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)的患者和 27 名接受头颅磁共振成像、CT 和 PET 的患者。磁共振、CT 和 PET 图像融合后,进行重新采样,以标准化视野和矩阵大小,并准备数据集。在间接法中,生成的是合成 CT(SCT)图像,而在直接法和直接+HRC 法中,使用 U 型网结构生成 AC 图像。在间接法中,衰减校正是通过使用 U-net 的磁共振成像结果生成的 SCT 图像而不是 CT 图像进行的。在直接法和直接+HRC 法中,AC 图像是使用 U-net 从非 AC 图像直接生成的,然后进行图像评估。根据归一化均方误差(NMSE)和结构相似度(SSIM),比较了间接法和直接法生成的交流图像的精确度:肉眼观察发现,使用基于 CT 的衰减校正法生成的 AC 图像与使用上述三种方法生成的图像没有区别。NMSE依次为间接法、直接法和直接+HRC法,分别为0.281×10-3、4.62×10-3和12.7×10-3。此外,直接+HRC 方法的 SSIM 为 0.975:结论:直接+HRC 方法无需 CT 暴露即可实现精确衰减,无需专用校正程序即可实现高分辨率校正。
Feasibility of direct brain 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography attenuation and high-resolution correction methods using deep learning.
Objectives: To develop the following three attenuation correction (AC) methods for brain 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET), using deep learning, and to ascertain their precision levels: (i) indirect method; (ii) direct method; and (iii) direct and high-resolution correction (direct+HRC) method.
Methods: We included 53 patients who underwent cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) and 27 patients who underwent cranial MRI, CT, and PET. After fusion of the magnetic resonance, CT, and PET images, resampling was performed to standardize the field of view and matrix size and prepare the data set. In the indirect method, synthetic CT (SCT) images were generated, whereas in the direct and direct+HRC methods, a U-net structure was used to generate AC images. In the indirect method, attenuation correction was performed using SCT images generated from MRI findings using U-net instead of CT images. In the direct and direct+HRC methods, AC images were generated directly from non-AC images using U-net, followed by image evaluation. The precision levels of AC images generated using the indirect and direct methods were compared based on the normalized mean squared error (NMSE) and structural similarity (SSIM).
Results: Visual inspection revealed no difference between the AC images prepared using CT-based attenuation correction and those prepared using the three methods. The NMSE increased in the order indirect, direct, and direct+HRC methods, with values of 0.281×10-3, 4.62×10-3, and 12.7×10-3, respectively. Moreover, the SSIM of the direct+HRC method was 0.975.
Conclusion: The direct+HRC method enables accurate attenuation without CT exposure and high-resolution correction without dedicated correction programs.