使用有限元法对各种义齿咬合方案下的吸收嵴进行疼痛相关分析。

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2024-07-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202405798
David Fatola, Ismet Danial Nasution, Muhammad Sabri, Ricca Chairunnisa
{"title":"使用有限元法对各种义齿咬合方案下的吸收嵴进行疼痛相关分析。","authors":"David Fatola, Ismet Danial Nasution, Muhammad Sabri, Ricca Chairunnisa","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202405798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resorbed alveolar ridges, particularly in the lower jaw, have a small denture supporting area, which may cause the stress distribution of mastication load to exceed the pressure-pain threshold (PPT) and induce pain in the mucosa or potentially worsen the ridge resorption. Thus, choosing the ideal occlusal scheme among bilateral balanced (BBO), lingualized (LO), and monoplane (MO) for such conditions becomes crucial. The experiment was conducted using the finite element method on a modeling of a resorbed alveolar ridge in the lower jaw with three dentures placed on top, each of which was given different loading points according to the tooth arrangement of BBO, LO, and MO. The axial load was 100 N, and the resultant oblique loads on BBO and LO were 119 N and 106 N, respectively. The von Mises stresses for BBO, LO, and MO were observed in nine denture-supporting areas, and the results showed that the axial load did not produce stresses that exceeded the PPT value (0.64925 MPa) for BBO, LO, and MO with the highest value on area H, 0.43229 MPa, 0.39715 MPa, and 0.31576 MPa, respectively. However, the oblique load direction showed that the BBO had more areas (area E 0.80778 MPa and area H 0.76256 MPa) that exceeded the PPT than LO (area E 0.64394 MPa). The lingualized occlusal scheme is ideal for patients with resorbed alveolar ridge conditions, especially in terms of limiting interferences when the denture is functioning while maintaining comfort but still providing good masticatory performance and satisfactory esthetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"5798"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain-related analysis on a resorbed ridge with various denture occlusal schemes using finite element method.\",\"authors\":\"David Fatola, Ismet Danial Nasution, Muhammad Sabri, Ricca Chairunnisa\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6440202405798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Resorbed alveolar ridges, particularly in the lower jaw, have a small denture supporting area, which may cause the stress distribution of mastication load to exceed the pressure-pain threshold (PPT) and induce pain in the mucosa or potentially worsen the ridge resorption. Thus, choosing the ideal occlusal scheme among bilateral balanced (BBO), lingualized (LO), and monoplane (MO) for such conditions becomes crucial. The experiment was conducted using the finite element method on a modeling of a resorbed alveolar ridge in the lower jaw with three dentures placed on top, each of which was given different loading points according to the tooth arrangement of BBO, LO, and MO. The axial load was 100 N, and the resultant oblique loads on BBO and LO were 119 N and 106 N, respectively. The von Mises stresses for BBO, LO, and MO were observed in nine denture-supporting areas, and the results showed that the axial load did not produce stresses that exceeded the PPT value (0.64925 MPa) for BBO, LO, and MO with the highest value on area H, 0.43229 MPa, 0.39715 MPa, and 0.31576 MPa, respectively. However, the oblique load direction showed that the BBO had more areas (area E 0.80778 MPa and area H 0.76256 MPa) that exceeded the PPT than LO (area E 0.64394 MPa). The lingualized occlusal scheme is ideal for patients with resorbed alveolar ridge conditions, especially in terms of limiting interferences when the denture is functioning while maintaining comfort but still providing good masticatory performance and satisfactory esthetics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"5798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262769/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202405798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202405798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙槽嵴吸收,尤其是下颌的牙槽嵴吸收,由于义齿支持面积较小,可能会导致咀嚼负荷的应力分布超过压力-疼痛阈值(PPT),引起粘膜疼痛或潜在地加重牙槽嵴吸收。因此,在双侧平衡咬合(BBO)、舌化咬合(LO)和单平面咬合(MO)中选择适合这种情况的理想咬合方案就变得至关重要。实验采用有限元法对下颌吸收的牙槽嵴进行了建模,上面放置了三个假牙,每个假牙根据 BBO、LO 和 MO 的牙齿排列方式被赋予不同的加载点。轴向载荷为 100 N,由此对 BBO 和 LO 产生的斜向载荷分别为 119 N 和 106 N。对 BBO、LO 和 MO 的九个义齿支撑区域的 von Mises 应力进行了观察,结果表明,轴向载荷对 BBO、LO 和 MO 产生的应力未超过 PPT 值(0.64925 MPa),其中 H 区域的应力值最高,分别为 0.43229 MPa、0.39715 MPa 和 0.31576 MPa。然而,斜负荷方向显示,BBO 比 LO(面积 E 0.64394 MPa)有更多的面积(面积 E 0.80778 MPa 和面积 H 0.76256 MPa)超过了 PPT。舌侧咬合方案是牙槽嵴吸收患者的理想选择,尤其是在义齿功能时,既能限制干扰,又能保持舒适,同时还能提供良好的咀嚼功能和令人满意的美观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pain-related analysis on a resorbed ridge with various denture occlusal schemes using finite element method.

Pain-related analysis on a resorbed ridge with various denture occlusal schemes using finite element method.

Pain-related analysis on a resorbed ridge with various denture occlusal schemes using finite element method.

Pain-related analysis on a resorbed ridge with various denture occlusal schemes using finite element method.

Resorbed alveolar ridges, particularly in the lower jaw, have a small denture supporting area, which may cause the stress distribution of mastication load to exceed the pressure-pain threshold (PPT) and induce pain in the mucosa or potentially worsen the ridge resorption. Thus, choosing the ideal occlusal scheme among bilateral balanced (BBO), lingualized (LO), and monoplane (MO) for such conditions becomes crucial. The experiment was conducted using the finite element method on a modeling of a resorbed alveolar ridge in the lower jaw with three dentures placed on top, each of which was given different loading points according to the tooth arrangement of BBO, LO, and MO. The axial load was 100 N, and the resultant oblique loads on BBO and LO were 119 N and 106 N, respectively. The von Mises stresses for BBO, LO, and MO were observed in nine denture-supporting areas, and the results showed that the axial load did not produce stresses that exceeded the PPT value (0.64925 MPa) for BBO, LO, and MO with the highest value on area H, 0.43229 MPa, 0.39715 MPa, and 0.31576 MPa, respectively. However, the oblique load direction showed that the BBO had more areas (area E 0.80778 MPa and area H 0.76256 MPa) that exceeded the PPT than LO (area E 0.64394 MPa). The lingualized occlusal scheme is ideal for patients with resorbed alveolar ridge conditions, especially in terms of limiting interferences when the denture is functioning while maintaining comfort but still providing good masticatory performance and satisfactory esthetics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信