你会帮助谁?性侵犯中施暴者和受害者性别对旁观者行为的影响》。

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q1 WOMENS STUDIES
Violence Against Women Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1177/10778012241263104
Anne Lippert, Dylan Baker, Gregory Hawk, Nissa Gongora, Jonathan Golding
{"title":"你会帮助谁?性侵犯中施暴者和受害者性别对旁观者行为的影响》。","authors":"Anne Lippert, Dylan Baker, Gregory Hawk, Nissa Gongora, Jonathan Golding","doi":"10.1177/10778012241263104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the impact of perpetrator and victim gender on bystander helping choices and assault perceptions. Participants (32 females, 37 males) read about two simultaneously occurring sexual assaults, indicated which victim they would help, and gave their perceptions of the assaults. We used a within-participants design that fully manipulated the perpetrator and victim gender for both assaults. Results showed female victims of male perpetrators and male victims of female perpetrators were most and least likely to be chosen for help, respectively. Cognitive networks derived from open-ended responses provided insight into the rationale used by participants to make helping decisions in ways that differed by perpetrator and victim gender.</p>","PeriodicalId":23606,"journal":{"name":"Violence Against Women","volume":" ","pages":"3000-3023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whom Would You Help? The Impact of Perpetrator and Victim Gender on Bystander Behavior During a Sexual Assault.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Lippert, Dylan Baker, Gregory Hawk, Nissa Gongora, Jonathan Golding\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10778012241263104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We examined the impact of perpetrator and victim gender on bystander helping choices and assault perceptions. Participants (32 females, 37 males) read about two simultaneously occurring sexual assaults, indicated which victim they would help, and gave their perceptions of the assaults. We used a within-participants design that fully manipulated the perpetrator and victim gender for both assaults. Results showed female victims of male perpetrators and male victims of female perpetrators were most and least likely to be chosen for help, respectively. Cognitive networks derived from open-ended responses provided insight into the rationale used by participants to make helping decisions in ways that differed by perpetrator and victim gender.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Violence Against Women\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3000-3023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Violence Against Women\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241263104\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Violence Against Women","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241263104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了施暴者和受害者的性别对旁观者帮助选择和对攻击行为看法的影响。参与者(32 名女性和 37 名男性)阅读了两起同时发生的性侵犯事件,表示他们会帮助哪位受害者,并给出了他们对侵犯事件的看法。我们采用了参与者内部设计,完全操纵了两起性侵犯事件中施暴者和受害者的性别。结果显示,男性施暴者的女性受害者和女性施暴者的男性受害者被选择帮助的可能性分别最大和最小。从开放式回答中得出的认知网络让我们深入了解了参与者在做出帮助决定时所使用的理由,这些理由因施暴者和受害者的性别而有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whom Would You Help? The Impact of Perpetrator and Victim Gender on Bystander Behavior During a Sexual Assault.

We examined the impact of perpetrator and victim gender on bystander helping choices and assault perceptions. Participants (32 females, 37 males) read about two simultaneously occurring sexual assaults, indicated which victim they would help, and gave their perceptions of the assaults. We used a within-participants design that fully manipulated the perpetrator and victim gender for both assaults. Results showed female victims of male perpetrators and male victims of female perpetrators were most and least likely to be chosen for help, respectively. Cognitive networks derived from open-ended responses provided insight into the rationale used by participants to make helping decisions in ways that differed by perpetrator and victim gender.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Violence Against Women
Violence Against Women WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: Violence against Women is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of research and information on all aspects of the problem of violence against women. The journal assumes a broad definition of violence; topics to be covered include, but are not limited to, domestic violence, sexual assault, incest, sexual harassment, female infantcide, female circumcision, and female sexual slavery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信