朗伯格试验重温:纯感觉神经病变患者经典和高级摇摆指标的变化。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Evangelos Anagnostou , Maria Kouvli , Evangelia Karagianni , Anastasia Gamvroula , Theodosis Kalamatianos , George Stranjalis , Maria Skoularidou
{"title":"朗伯格试验重温:纯感觉神经病变患者经典和高级摇摆指标的变化。","authors":"Evangelos Anagnostou ,&nbsp;Maria Kouvli ,&nbsp;Evangelia Karagianni ,&nbsp;Anastasia Gamvroula ,&nbsp;Theodosis Kalamatianos ,&nbsp;George Stranjalis ,&nbsp;Maria Skoularidou","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2024.102999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The Romberg test, undoubtedly a classical and well-established method in physical neurological assessment of patients with sensory ataxia, has long been suspected to be prone to several limitations. Here, we quantified upright stance before and after visual deprivation in a selected cohort of patients with pure sensory neuropathy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Static balance was assessed in sensory neuropathy patients during quiet stance on a force platform under different visual and proprioceptive feedback conditions. Sural nerve neurography was employed to evaluate the severity of peripheral neuropathy. Conventional and advanced postural sway metrics were investigated to draw a quantitative analogy to the clinical Romberg test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Posturographic analyses showed that patients displayed Romberg and vestibular Romberg quotient values around 2, indicating an approximately twofold increase in body sway in the absence of vision. However, the diagnostic discrimination ability between patients and controls was only modest. Even less impactful were the diagnostic contributions of frequency domain and non-linear sway analyses. This was primarily attributed to the heightened body sway exhibited by patients with sensory neuropathy under 'eyes open' conditions, diminishing the contrast with the 'eyes closed' condition as assessed in the classical Romberg test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We conclude that the Romberg test, even in its quantitative form with the aid of an apparatus, had an unsatisfactory classification value in terms of distinguishing patients from healthy controls. Instead, it should be interpreted within the comprehensive context of the broader neurological examination and the electrodiagnosis of peripheral nerve function.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"54 5","pages":"Article 102999"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Romberg's test revisited: Changes in classical and advanced sway metrics in patients with pure sensory neuropathy\",\"authors\":\"Evangelos Anagnostou ,&nbsp;Maria Kouvli ,&nbsp;Evangelia Karagianni ,&nbsp;Anastasia Gamvroula ,&nbsp;Theodosis Kalamatianos ,&nbsp;George Stranjalis ,&nbsp;Maria Skoularidou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neucli.2024.102999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The Romberg test, undoubtedly a classical and well-established method in physical neurological assessment of patients with sensory ataxia, has long been suspected to be prone to several limitations. Here, we quantified upright stance before and after visual deprivation in a selected cohort of patients with pure sensory neuropathy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Static balance was assessed in sensory neuropathy patients during quiet stance on a force platform under different visual and proprioceptive feedback conditions. Sural nerve neurography was employed to evaluate the severity of peripheral neuropathy. Conventional and advanced postural sway metrics were investigated to draw a quantitative analogy to the clinical Romberg test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Posturographic analyses showed that patients displayed Romberg and vestibular Romberg quotient values around 2, indicating an approximately twofold increase in body sway in the absence of vision. However, the diagnostic discrimination ability between patients and controls was only modest. Even less impactful were the diagnostic contributions of frequency domain and non-linear sway analyses. This was primarily attributed to the heightened body sway exhibited by patients with sensory neuropathy under 'eyes open' conditions, diminishing the contrast with the 'eyes closed' condition as assessed in the classical Romberg test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We conclude that the Romberg test, even in its quantitative form with the aid of an apparatus, had an unsatisfactory classification value in terms of distinguishing patients from healthy controls. Instead, it should be interpreted within the comprehensive context of the broader neurological examination and the electrodiagnosis of peripheral nerve function.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102999\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705324000571\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705324000571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:朗伯格试验无疑是对感觉共济失调患者进行物理神经学评估的一种经典且行之有效的方法,但长期以来,人们一直怀疑这种方法存在一些局限性。在此,我们对一组精选的纯感觉神经病患者在视觉剥夺前后的直立姿态进行了量化:方法:在不同的视觉和本体感觉反馈条件下,评估感觉神经病患者在力平台上安静站立时的静态平衡。采用耳神经造影术评估周围神经病变的严重程度。研究了常规和高级姿势摇摆指标,以便与临床朗伯格试验进行定量类比:结果:体位摇摆分析表明,患者的朗伯格和前庭朗伯格商值约为 2,表明在没有视觉的情况下身体摇摆增加了约两倍。然而,患者与对照组之间的诊断分辨能力并不高。频域和非线性摇摆分析对诊断的影响更小。这主要是由于感觉神经病变患者在 "睁眼 "状态下表现出更强的身体摇摆,从而减弱了与经典朗伯格测试中评估的 "闭眼 "状态的对比:我们的结论是,罗姆伯格试验即使是借助仪器的定量形式,在区分患者和健康对照组方面的分类价值也不能令人满意。相反,应该在更广泛的神经系统检查和周围神经功能电诊断的综合背景下对其进行解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Romberg's test revisited: Changes in classical and advanced sway metrics in patients with pure sensory neuropathy

Objectives

The Romberg test, undoubtedly a classical and well-established method in physical neurological assessment of patients with sensory ataxia, has long been suspected to be prone to several limitations. Here, we quantified upright stance before and after visual deprivation in a selected cohort of patients with pure sensory neuropathy.

Methods

Static balance was assessed in sensory neuropathy patients during quiet stance on a force platform under different visual and proprioceptive feedback conditions. Sural nerve neurography was employed to evaluate the severity of peripheral neuropathy. Conventional and advanced postural sway metrics were investigated to draw a quantitative analogy to the clinical Romberg test.

Results

Posturographic analyses showed that patients displayed Romberg and vestibular Romberg quotient values around 2, indicating an approximately twofold increase in body sway in the absence of vision. However, the diagnostic discrimination ability between patients and controls was only modest. Even less impactful were the diagnostic contributions of frequency domain and non-linear sway analyses. This was primarily attributed to the heightened body sway exhibited by patients with sensory neuropathy under 'eyes open' conditions, diminishing the contrast with the 'eyes closed' condition as assessed in the classical Romberg test.

Conclusion

We conclude that the Romberg test, even in its quantitative form with the aid of an apparatus, had an unsatisfactory classification value in terms of distinguishing patients from healthy controls. Instead, it should be interpreted within the comprehensive context of the broader neurological examination and the electrodiagnosis of peripheral nerve function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信