Jan Versijpt, Christina Deligianni, Muizz Hussain, Faisal Amin, Uwe Reuter, Margarita Sanchez-Del-Rio, Derya Uluduz, Deirdre Boucherie, Dena Zeraatkar, Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink, Simona Sacco, Christian Lampl, Raquel Gil-Gouveia
{"title":"欧洲头痛联合会(EHF)对预防偏头痛的口服药物的重要再评估和荟萃分析--第 4 部分:普萘洛尔。","authors":"Jan Versijpt, Christina Deligianni, Muizz Hussain, Faisal Amin, Uwe Reuter, Margarita Sanchez-Del-Rio, Derya Uluduz, Deirdre Boucherie, Dena Zeraatkar, Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink, Simona Sacco, Christian Lampl, Raquel Gil-Gouveia","doi":"10.1186/s10194-024-01826-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this paper is to critically re-appraise the published trials assessing propranolol for migraine prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report methods and results following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA), by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized trials of pharmacologic treatments for migraine prophylaxis. We included randomized trials that compared propranolol with placebo for migraine prophylaxis in adults. The outcomes of interest were informed by the Core outcome set for preventive intervention trials in chronic and episodic migraine (COSMIG) and include the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, the reduction of monthly migraine days, and the number of adverse events leading to discontinuation. We assessed risk of bias by using a modified Cochrane RoB (risk of bias) 2.0 tool and the certainty of evidence by using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded twenty trials (n = 1291 patients) eligible for data synthesis and analysis. The analysis revealed a moderate certainty evidence that propranolol leads to a reduction in monthly migraine days versus placebo (-1.27; 95% CI: -2.25 to -0.3). We found moderate certainty evidence that propranolol increases the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo with a relative risk of 1.65 (95% CI 1.41 to 1.93); absolute risk difference: 179 more per 1,000 (95% CI 113 to 256). We found high certainty evidence that propranolol increases the proportion of patients who discontinue due to adverse events compared to placebo with a risk difference of 0.02 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.03); absolute risk difference: 20 more per 1,000 (95% CI 0 to 30).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present meta-analysis shows that propranolol has a prophylactic role in migraine, with an overall acceptable tolerability profile. Combining these results with its long-standing use and its global availability at a low cost confirms its role as a first line agent in the prophylaxis of migraine.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention - part 4: propranolol.\",\"authors\":\"Jan Versijpt, Christina Deligianni, Muizz Hussain, Faisal Amin, Uwe Reuter, Margarita Sanchez-Del-Rio, Derya Uluduz, Deirdre Boucherie, Dena Zeraatkar, Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink, Simona Sacco, Christian Lampl, Raquel Gil-Gouveia\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10194-024-01826-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this paper is to critically re-appraise the published trials assessing propranolol for migraine prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report methods and results following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA), by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized trials of pharmacologic treatments for migraine prophylaxis. We included randomized trials that compared propranolol with placebo for migraine prophylaxis in adults. The outcomes of interest were informed by the Core outcome set for preventive intervention trials in chronic and episodic migraine (COSMIG) and include the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, the reduction of monthly migraine days, and the number of adverse events leading to discontinuation. We assessed risk of bias by using a modified Cochrane RoB (risk of bias) 2.0 tool and the certainty of evidence by using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded twenty trials (n = 1291 patients) eligible for data synthesis and analysis. The analysis revealed a moderate certainty evidence that propranolol leads to a reduction in monthly migraine days versus placebo (-1.27; 95% CI: -2.25 to -0.3). We found moderate certainty evidence that propranolol increases the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo with a relative risk of 1.65 (95% CI 1.41 to 1.93); absolute risk difference: 179 more per 1,000 (95% CI 113 to 256). We found high certainty evidence that propranolol increases the proportion of patients who discontinue due to adverse events compared to placebo with a risk difference of 0.02 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.03); absolute risk difference: 20 more per 1,000 (95% CI 0 to 30).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present meta-analysis shows that propranolol has a prophylactic role in migraine, with an overall acceptable tolerability profile. Combining these results with its long-standing use and its global availability at a low cost confirms its role as a first line agent in the prophylaxis of migraine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267726/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01826-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01826-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本文旨在对已发表的评估普萘洛尔用于偏头痛预防的试验进行重新评估:本文旨在对已发表的评估普萘洛尔用于偏头痛预防的试验进行批判性再评估:我们按照系统综述首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews,PRISMA)的要求,通过检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane CENTRAL和ClinicalTrials.gov,报告了偏头痛预防药物治疗的随机试验的方法和结果。我们纳入了比较普萘洛尔与安慰剂用于成人偏头痛预防的随机试验。相关结果参考了慢性和发作性偏头痛预防性干预试验(COSMIG)的核心结果集,包括每月偏头痛天数减少50%或以上的患者比例、每月偏头痛天数减少情况以及导致停药的不良事件数量。我们使用修改后的 Cochrane RoB(偏倚风险)2.0 工具评估了偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 方法评估了证据的确定性:我们的搜索结果显示有 20 项试验(n = 1291 例患者)符合数据综合与分析的条件。分析结果显示,普萘洛尔与安慰剂相比可减少每月偏头痛天数(-1.27;95% CI:-2.25 至 -0.3),这属于中度确定性证据。我们发现中度确定性证据表明,与安慰剂相比,普萘洛尔可使每月偏头痛天数减少 50%或更多的患者比例增加,相对风险为 1.65 (95% CI 1.41 至 1.93);绝对风险差异为:每 1,000 人中多 179 人(95% CI 1.41 至 1.93):每 1000 人中多 179 人(95% CI 113 至 256)。我们发现高度确定的证据表明,与安慰剂相比,普萘洛尔会增加因不良事件而停药的患者比例,风险差异为0.02(95% CI 0.00至0.03);绝对风险差异:每1,000人中增加20人(95% CI 0至30):本荟萃分析表明,普萘洛尔对偏头痛有预防作用,且总体耐受性可接受。将这些结果与普萘洛尔的长期使用及其在全球范围内的低成本供应相结合,证实了其作为偏头痛预防性治疗一线药物的作用。
European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention - part 4: propranolol.
Objective: The aim of this paper is to critically re-appraise the published trials assessing propranolol for migraine prophylaxis.
Methods: We report methods and results following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA), by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized trials of pharmacologic treatments for migraine prophylaxis. We included randomized trials that compared propranolol with placebo for migraine prophylaxis in adults. The outcomes of interest were informed by the Core outcome set for preventive intervention trials in chronic and episodic migraine (COSMIG) and include the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, the reduction of monthly migraine days, and the number of adverse events leading to discontinuation. We assessed risk of bias by using a modified Cochrane RoB (risk of bias) 2.0 tool and the certainty of evidence by using the GRADE approach.
Results: Our search yielded twenty trials (n = 1291 patients) eligible for data synthesis and analysis. The analysis revealed a moderate certainty evidence that propranolol leads to a reduction in monthly migraine days versus placebo (-1.27; 95% CI: -2.25 to -0.3). We found moderate certainty evidence that propranolol increases the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo with a relative risk of 1.65 (95% CI 1.41 to 1.93); absolute risk difference: 179 more per 1,000 (95% CI 113 to 256). We found high certainty evidence that propranolol increases the proportion of patients who discontinue due to adverse events compared to placebo with a risk difference of 0.02 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.03); absolute risk difference: 20 more per 1,000 (95% CI 0 to 30).
Conclusions: The present meta-analysis shows that propranolol has a prophylactic role in migraine, with an overall acceptable tolerability profile. Combining these results with its long-standing use and its global availability at a low cost confirms its role as a first line agent in the prophylaxis of migraine.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data.
With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.