在健康成年人中,任务外静息时的皮层脊髓兴奋性与任务间歇时的皮层脊髓兴奋性并无差异。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06895-8
Kate Bakken, Chris Horton, Mitchell Fisher, Corey G Wadsley, Ian Greenhouse
{"title":"在健康成年人中,任务外静息时的皮层脊髓兴奋性与任务间歇时的皮层脊髓兴奋性并无差异。","authors":"Kate Bakken, Chris Horton, Mitchell Fisher, Corey G Wadsley, Ian Greenhouse","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06895-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human corticospinal excitability (CSE) modulates during movement, when muscles are active, but also at rest, when muscles are not active. These changes in resting motor system excitability can be transient or longer lasting. Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies suggests even relatively short periods of motor learning on the order of minutes can have lasting effects on resting CSE. Whether individuals are able to return CSE to out-of-task resting levels during the intertrial intervals (ITI) of behavioral tasks that do not include an intended motor learning component is an important question. Here, in twenty-five healthy young adults, we used single-pulse TMS and electromyography (EMG) to measure motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during two different resting contexts: (1) prior to engaging in the response task during which participants were instructed only to rest (out-of-task), and (2) ITI of a choice-reaction time task (in-task). In both contexts, five TMS intensities were used to evaluate possible differences in recruitment of corticospinal (CS) output across a range of inputs. We hypothesized resting state CSE would be greater during ITI than out-of-task rest, reflected in larger MEP amplitudes. Contrary to our hypothesis, we observed no significant difference in MEP amplitudes between out-of-task rest and in-task ITI, and instead found evidence of equivalence, indicating that humans are able to return to a stable motor resting state within seconds after a response. These data support the interpretation that rest is a uniform motor state in the healthy nervous system. In the future, our data may be a useful reference for motor disorder populations with an impaired ability to return to rest.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"2263-2270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corticospinal excitability at rest outside of a task does not differ from task intertrial intervals in healthy adults.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Bakken, Chris Horton, Mitchell Fisher, Corey G Wadsley, Ian Greenhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00221-024-06895-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human corticospinal excitability (CSE) modulates during movement, when muscles are active, but also at rest, when muscles are not active. These changes in resting motor system excitability can be transient or longer lasting. Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies suggests even relatively short periods of motor learning on the order of minutes can have lasting effects on resting CSE. Whether individuals are able to return CSE to out-of-task resting levels during the intertrial intervals (ITI) of behavioral tasks that do not include an intended motor learning component is an important question. Here, in twenty-five healthy young adults, we used single-pulse TMS and electromyography (EMG) to measure motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during two different resting contexts: (1) prior to engaging in the response task during which participants were instructed only to rest (out-of-task), and (2) ITI of a choice-reaction time task (in-task). In both contexts, five TMS intensities were used to evaluate possible differences in recruitment of corticospinal (CS) output across a range of inputs. We hypothesized resting state CSE would be greater during ITI than out-of-task rest, reflected in larger MEP amplitudes. Contrary to our hypothesis, we observed no significant difference in MEP amplitudes between out-of-task rest and in-task ITI, and instead found evidence of equivalence, indicating that humans are able to return to a stable motor resting state within seconds after a response. These data support the interpretation that rest is a uniform motor state in the healthy nervous system. In the future, our data may be a useful reference for motor disorder populations with an impaired ability to return to rest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2263-2270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06895-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06895-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人的皮质脊髓兴奋性(CSE)在肌肉活动的运动过程中会发生调节,在肌肉不活动的静止状态下也会发生调节。静息运动系统兴奋性的这些变化可能是短暂的,也可能持续较长时间。经颅磁刺激(TMS)研究的证据表明,即使是几分钟左右的相对较短的运动学习时间,也会对静息 CSE 产生持久的影响。在不包含预期运动学习成分的行为任务的试验间歇(ITI)期间,个体是否能将 CSE 恢复到任务外的静息水平是一个重要的问题。在此,我们以 25 名健康的年轻人为研究对象,使用单脉冲 TMS 和肌电图(EMG)测量了两种不同静息环境下的运动诱发电位(MEPs):(1)在参与反应任务之前,在此期间参与者只被指示休息(任务外);(2)选择反应时间任务的 ITI(任务内)。在这两种情况下,我们都使用了五种 TMS 强度来评估在一系列输入中皮质脊髓(CS)输出招募可能存在的差异。我们假设静息状态下的 CSE 在 ITI 期间比任务外静息状态下更大,反映在更大的 MEP 振幅上。与我们的假设相反,我们观察到任务外静息和任务内 ITI 之间的 MEP 振幅没有显著差异,反而发现了等效的证据,表明人类能够在反应后几秒钟内恢复到稳定的运动静息状态。这些数据支持 "静息是健康神经系统的统一运动状态 "这一解释。未来,我们的数据可能会成为运动障碍人群恢复静息能力受损时的有用参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Corticospinal excitability at rest outside of a task does not differ from task intertrial intervals in healthy adults.

Corticospinal excitability at rest outside of a task does not differ from task intertrial intervals in healthy adults.

Human corticospinal excitability (CSE) modulates during movement, when muscles are active, but also at rest, when muscles are not active. These changes in resting motor system excitability can be transient or longer lasting. Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies suggests even relatively short periods of motor learning on the order of minutes can have lasting effects on resting CSE. Whether individuals are able to return CSE to out-of-task resting levels during the intertrial intervals (ITI) of behavioral tasks that do not include an intended motor learning component is an important question. Here, in twenty-five healthy young adults, we used single-pulse TMS and electromyography (EMG) to measure motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during two different resting contexts: (1) prior to engaging in the response task during which participants were instructed only to rest (out-of-task), and (2) ITI of a choice-reaction time task (in-task). In both contexts, five TMS intensities were used to evaluate possible differences in recruitment of corticospinal (CS) output across a range of inputs. We hypothesized resting state CSE would be greater during ITI than out-of-task rest, reflected in larger MEP amplitudes. Contrary to our hypothesis, we observed no significant difference in MEP amplitudes between out-of-task rest and in-task ITI, and instead found evidence of equivalence, indicating that humans are able to return to a stable motor resting state within seconds after a response. These data support the interpretation that rest is a uniform motor state in the healthy nervous system. In the future, our data may be a useful reference for motor disorder populations with an impaired ability to return to rest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信