需要进一步探讨多动症药物与双相情感障碍的交叉问题。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
U. Volpe
{"title":"需要进一步探讨多动症药物与双相情感障碍的交叉问题。","authors":"U. Volpe","doi":"10.1111/bdi.13467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bipolar disorder (BD) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may copresent and manifest as complex clinical presentations, often accompanied by further comorbidities such as anxiety and substance use disorders. ADHD/BD comorbidity not only relies on a widely reported symptomatological and neurobiological overlap, but it also creates an intricate interplay between ADHD, affective and other psychiatric conditions, requiring a more nuanced understanding of their comorbid nature. Moreover, clinical and nosological perspectives on the nature of the ADHD/BD comorbidity may significantly vary across developmental stages, ranging from an overestimated comorbidity (possibly due to the confound role of greater symptoms' overlap in childhood, adolescence and youth cases) to a prodromal developmental pattern (i.e., from ADHD to BD) or a separate nosological entity (“ADHD-BD”).<span><sup>1</sup></span> In younger patients, in particular, recent literature also suggests a possible specific role of emotional dysregulation, a common key feature of ADHD and bipolar spectrum disorders, acting as a confound variable that may enhance the misconception of ADHD/BD comorbidity and favor the misdiagnosis of ADHD as a BD spectrum disorder.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Clearly, the emphasis on the need to disentangle the complex relationship between juvenile ADHD and BD highlights the challenges in delineating these disorders for better diagnostic characterization and therapeutic indications.</p><p>The systematic review by Miskowiak et al.<span><sup>3</sup></span> addresses a highly relevant clinical topic, reporting on the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of ADHD pharmacotherapies to treat cognitive impairment and ADHD symptoms in juvenile and adult BD. Shared neurobiological dysregulations, particularly involving dopamine and norepinephrine signalling pathways, may significantly contribute to the symptomatic overlap between BD and ADHD. However, pharmacological interventions targeting dopamine and noradrenaline pathways (such as stimulants and alpha-2-adrenergic agonists) long held promise to ameliorate cognitive deficits and ADHD symptoms in individuals with BD. Indeed, the evidence relative to dysfunctions of the dopamine transporter (DAT) gene and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene variants underscores the intricate interplay between these disorders and prompts for therapeutic implications.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Miskowiak et al.<span><sup>3</sup></span> also report preliminary favorable evidence of efficacy of ADHD drugs in treating ADHD symptoms in BD, with a current lack of evidence for psychostimulants to trigger or exacerbate mania and insufficient evidence to conclude on their role in improving cognitive symptoms in BD.</p><p>Also in our previous work,<span><sup>5</sup></span> we underscored the potential benefits of adjunctive therapy in alleviating ADHD symptoms in BD patients. Indeed, while mood stabilization should remain the main target of BD patients (as impulsivity, hyperactivity, and inattention symptoms may recede after stabilization), the presence of “residual” (and particularly cognitive) symptoms may require specific ADHD drugs. We agree that methylphenidate and mixed amphetamine salts represent the most promising options in the treatment of BD, with robust beneficial effects observed particularly in pediatric and adolescent populations. However, the paucity of data concerning atomoxetine, viloxizine, modafinil, armodafinil, and lisdexamfetamine (that, importantly, is the only stimulant marketed for use in ADHD to be studied as an add-on strategy for treatment-resistant bipolar depression) demands for a still cautious and highly individualized approach. On the other hand, we also highlighted a favorable safety profile of ADHD medications with no increased risk of manic episodes, especially when administered alongside mood stabilizers, and this evidence should favor their use in BD.</p><p>A more recent examination of comorbidities in youth with BD explored both clinical characteristics and pharmacological treatment approaches.<span><sup>6</sup></span> This review underscores the relevance of customized interventions to effectively address the diverse needs of this patient cohort. However, it also highlights a notable gap in research concerning pharmacological interventions for BD and its concurrent conditions, particularly in the pediatric and adolescent age groups.</p><p>Despite the promising efficacy and safety profile of ADHD medications, significant gaps remain in our understanding of their cognitive effects and long-term outcomes in BD patients. Future research endeavors should prioritize comprehensive cognitive assessments, individual characterization of patients and larger sample sizes to elucidate the potential cognitive benefits of these medications. Also, specific attention should be devoted to develop controlled clinical trials sensitive to emotional dysregulation along different developmental stages, in order to really improve the prognosis of these highly complex patients, that require finely characterized diagnostic processes and highly personalized therapies. Indeed, tailored interventions addressing comorbidities and developmental nuances are imperative to optimize treatment outcomes and enhance the quality of life for individuals with BD and ADHD features.</p><p>In conclusion, a multifaceted approach encompassing neurobiological insights, clinical complexity, and treatment implications is essential in navigating at the intersection of ADHD medications and BD. By integrating findings from different clinical perspectives, we can advance personalized care paradigms, tailored to the unique needs of individuals within the BD spectrum. Embracing interdisciplinary collaboration and prioritizing specific research endeavors are crucial steps toward optimizing treatment outcomes and improving the quality of life for this complex patient population.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":8959,"journal":{"name":"Bipolar Disorders","volume":"26 6","pages":"622-623"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bdi.13467","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Need for further exploring at the intersection of ADHD medications and bipolar disorder\",\"authors\":\"U. Volpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bdi.13467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bipolar disorder (BD) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may copresent and manifest as complex clinical presentations, often accompanied by further comorbidities such as anxiety and substance use disorders. ADHD/BD comorbidity not only relies on a widely reported symptomatological and neurobiological overlap, but it also creates an intricate interplay between ADHD, affective and other psychiatric conditions, requiring a more nuanced understanding of their comorbid nature. Moreover, clinical and nosological perspectives on the nature of the ADHD/BD comorbidity may significantly vary across developmental stages, ranging from an overestimated comorbidity (possibly due to the confound role of greater symptoms' overlap in childhood, adolescence and youth cases) to a prodromal developmental pattern (i.e., from ADHD to BD) or a separate nosological entity (“ADHD-BD”).<span><sup>1</sup></span> In younger patients, in particular, recent literature also suggests a possible specific role of emotional dysregulation, a common key feature of ADHD and bipolar spectrum disorders, acting as a confound variable that may enhance the misconception of ADHD/BD comorbidity and favor the misdiagnosis of ADHD as a BD spectrum disorder.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Clearly, the emphasis on the need to disentangle the complex relationship between juvenile ADHD and BD highlights the challenges in delineating these disorders for better diagnostic characterization and therapeutic indications.</p><p>The systematic review by Miskowiak et al.<span><sup>3</sup></span> addresses a highly relevant clinical topic, reporting on the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of ADHD pharmacotherapies to treat cognitive impairment and ADHD symptoms in juvenile and adult BD. Shared neurobiological dysregulations, particularly involving dopamine and norepinephrine signalling pathways, may significantly contribute to the symptomatic overlap between BD and ADHD. However, pharmacological interventions targeting dopamine and noradrenaline pathways (such as stimulants and alpha-2-adrenergic agonists) long held promise to ameliorate cognitive deficits and ADHD symptoms in individuals with BD. Indeed, the evidence relative to dysfunctions of the dopamine transporter (DAT) gene and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene variants underscores the intricate interplay between these disorders and prompts for therapeutic implications.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Miskowiak et al.<span><sup>3</sup></span> also report preliminary favorable evidence of efficacy of ADHD drugs in treating ADHD symptoms in BD, with a current lack of evidence for psychostimulants to trigger or exacerbate mania and insufficient evidence to conclude on their role in improving cognitive symptoms in BD.</p><p>Also in our previous work,<span><sup>5</sup></span> we underscored the potential benefits of adjunctive therapy in alleviating ADHD symptoms in BD patients. Indeed, while mood stabilization should remain the main target of BD patients (as impulsivity, hyperactivity, and inattention symptoms may recede after stabilization), the presence of “residual” (and particularly cognitive) symptoms may require specific ADHD drugs. We agree that methylphenidate and mixed amphetamine salts represent the most promising options in the treatment of BD, with robust beneficial effects observed particularly in pediatric and adolescent populations. However, the paucity of data concerning atomoxetine, viloxizine, modafinil, armodafinil, and lisdexamfetamine (that, importantly, is the only stimulant marketed for use in ADHD to be studied as an add-on strategy for treatment-resistant bipolar depression) demands for a still cautious and highly individualized approach. On the other hand, we also highlighted a favorable safety profile of ADHD medications with no increased risk of manic episodes, especially when administered alongside mood stabilizers, and this evidence should favor their use in BD.</p><p>A more recent examination of comorbidities in youth with BD explored both clinical characteristics and pharmacological treatment approaches.<span><sup>6</sup></span> This review underscores the relevance of customized interventions to effectively address the diverse needs of this patient cohort. However, it also highlights a notable gap in research concerning pharmacological interventions for BD and its concurrent conditions, particularly in the pediatric and adolescent age groups.</p><p>Despite the promising efficacy and safety profile of ADHD medications, significant gaps remain in our understanding of their cognitive effects and long-term outcomes in BD patients. Future research endeavors should prioritize comprehensive cognitive assessments, individual characterization of patients and larger sample sizes to elucidate the potential cognitive benefits of these medications. Also, specific attention should be devoted to develop controlled clinical trials sensitive to emotional dysregulation along different developmental stages, in order to really improve the prognosis of these highly complex patients, that require finely characterized diagnostic processes and highly personalized therapies. Indeed, tailored interventions addressing comorbidities and developmental nuances are imperative to optimize treatment outcomes and enhance the quality of life for individuals with BD and ADHD features.</p><p>In conclusion, a multifaceted approach encompassing neurobiological insights, clinical complexity, and treatment implications is essential in navigating at the intersection of ADHD medications and BD. By integrating findings from different clinical perspectives, we can advance personalized care paradigms, tailored to the unique needs of individuals within the BD spectrum. Embracing interdisciplinary collaboration and prioritizing specific research endeavors are crucial steps toward optimizing treatment outcomes and improving the quality of life for this complex patient population.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bipolar Disorders\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"622-623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bdi.13467\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bipolar Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bdi.13467\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bdi.13467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双相情感障碍(BD)和注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)可能共同出现并表现为复杂的临床表现,通常还伴有其他合并症,如焦虑症和药物使用障碍。注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)/注意力缺陷多动障碍(BD)合并症不仅在症状学和神经生物学方面存在广泛报道的重叠,而且还在注意力缺陷多动障碍、情感障碍和其他精神疾病之间产生了错综复杂的相互作用,因此需要对其合并症的性质有更细致的了解。此外,关于多动症/BD 合并症性质的临床和命名学观点在不同发育阶段可能会有很大不同,从高估合并症(可能是由于童年、少年和青年病例中更多症状重叠的混淆作用)到前驱发展模式(即从多动症到 BD),不一而足、1 尤其是在年轻患者中,最近的文献还表明,情绪调节障碍(ADHD 和躁狂症谱系障碍的共同主要特征)可能起着特殊作用,它是一个混淆变量,可能会加深对 ADHD/BD 合并症的误解,并有利于将 ADHD 误诊为躁狂症谱系障碍。Miskowiak 等人3 的系统综述探讨了一个高度相关的临床课题,报告了现有证据显示 ADHD 药物疗法治疗青少年和成人 BD 认知障碍和 ADHD 症状的有效性和安全性。共同的神经生物学失调,尤其是涉及多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素信号通路的失调,可能是导致BD和ADHD症状重叠的重要原因。然而,长期以来,针对多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素通路的药物干预(如兴奋剂和α-2-肾上腺素能激动剂)有望改善 BD 患者的认知缺陷和 ADHD 症状。事实上,与多巴胺转运体(DAT)基因和儿茶酚-O-甲基转移酶(COMT)基因变体功能障碍有关的证据强调了这些疾病之间错综复杂的相互作用,并提示了治疗意义。4 Miskowiak 等人3 也报告了 ADHD 药物治疗 BD 患者 ADHD 症状疗效的初步有利证据,目前缺乏精神刺激剂引发或加剧躁狂症的证据,也没有足够的证据证明其在改善 BD 认知症状方面的作用。事实上,尽管情绪稳定仍应是 BD 患者的主要治疗目标(因为冲动、多动和注意力不集中症状在情绪稳定后可能会消退),但 "残余"(尤其是认知)症状的存在可能需要特定的 ADHD 药物。我们一致认为,哌醋甲酯和混合苯丙胺盐是治疗多动症最有前景的选择,尤其是在儿童和青少年群体中观察到了显著的疗效。然而,由于有关阿托西汀、维洛西汀、莫达非尼、阿莫达非尼和利司地辛(重要的是,利司地辛是市场上唯一一种用于治疗多动症的兴奋剂,也是唯一一种被研究用于治疗耐药双相抑郁症的附加策略)的数据较少,因此仍需采取谨慎和高度个体化的方法。另一方面,我们也强调了ADHD药物具有良好的安全性,不会增加躁狂发作的风险,尤其是在与情绪稳定剂同时使用的情况下,这一证据应有利于它们在双相抑郁症中的应用。6 这篇综述强调了定制干预措施的相关性,以有效满足这一患者群体的不同需求。尽管 ADHD 药物具有良好的疗效和安全性,但我们对这些药物对 BD 患者的认知影响和长期疗效的认识仍存在很大差距。未来的研究工作应优先考虑全面的认知评估、患者的个体特征和更大的样本量,以阐明这些药物对认知的潜在益处。此外,还应特别关注针对不同发育阶段的情绪失调开展对照临床试验,以真正改善这些高度复杂的患者的预后,这些患者需要精细的诊断过程和高度个性化的疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Need for further exploring at the intersection of ADHD medications and bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder (BD) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may copresent and manifest as complex clinical presentations, often accompanied by further comorbidities such as anxiety and substance use disorders. ADHD/BD comorbidity not only relies on a widely reported symptomatological and neurobiological overlap, but it also creates an intricate interplay between ADHD, affective and other psychiatric conditions, requiring a more nuanced understanding of their comorbid nature. Moreover, clinical and nosological perspectives on the nature of the ADHD/BD comorbidity may significantly vary across developmental stages, ranging from an overestimated comorbidity (possibly due to the confound role of greater symptoms' overlap in childhood, adolescence and youth cases) to a prodromal developmental pattern (i.e., from ADHD to BD) or a separate nosological entity (“ADHD-BD”).1 In younger patients, in particular, recent literature also suggests a possible specific role of emotional dysregulation, a common key feature of ADHD and bipolar spectrum disorders, acting as a confound variable that may enhance the misconception of ADHD/BD comorbidity and favor the misdiagnosis of ADHD as a BD spectrum disorder.2 Clearly, the emphasis on the need to disentangle the complex relationship between juvenile ADHD and BD highlights the challenges in delineating these disorders for better diagnostic characterization and therapeutic indications.

The systematic review by Miskowiak et al.3 addresses a highly relevant clinical topic, reporting on the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of ADHD pharmacotherapies to treat cognitive impairment and ADHD symptoms in juvenile and adult BD. Shared neurobiological dysregulations, particularly involving dopamine and norepinephrine signalling pathways, may significantly contribute to the symptomatic overlap between BD and ADHD. However, pharmacological interventions targeting dopamine and noradrenaline pathways (such as stimulants and alpha-2-adrenergic agonists) long held promise to ameliorate cognitive deficits and ADHD symptoms in individuals with BD. Indeed, the evidence relative to dysfunctions of the dopamine transporter (DAT) gene and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene variants underscores the intricate interplay between these disorders and prompts for therapeutic implications.4 Miskowiak et al.3 also report preliminary favorable evidence of efficacy of ADHD drugs in treating ADHD symptoms in BD, with a current lack of evidence for psychostimulants to trigger or exacerbate mania and insufficient evidence to conclude on their role in improving cognitive symptoms in BD.

Also in our previous work,5 we underscored the potential benefits of adjunctive therapy in alleviating ADHD symptoms in BD patients. Indeed, while mood stabilization should remain the main target of BD patients (as impulsivity, hyperactivity, and inattention symptoms may recede after stabilization), the presence of “residual” (and particularly cognitive) symptoms may require specific ADHD drugs. We agree that methylphenidate and mixed amphetamine salts represent the most promising options in the treatment of BD, with robust beneficial effects observed particularly in pediatric and adolescent populations. However, the paucity of data concerning atomoxetine, viloxizine, modafinil, armodafinil, and lisdexamfetamine (that, importantly, is the only stimulant marketed for use in ADHD to be studied as an add-on strategy for treatment-resistant bipolar depression) demands for a still cautious and highly individualized approach. On the other hand, we also highlighted a favorable safety profile of ADHD medications with no increased risk of manic episodes, especially when administered alongside mood stabilizers, and this evidence should favor their use in BD.

A more recent examination of comorbidities in youth with BD explored both clinical characteristics and pharmacological treatment approaches.6 This review underscores the relevance of customized interventions to effectively address the diverse needs of this patient cohort. However, it also highlights a notable gap in research concerning pharmacological interventions for BD and its concurrent conditions, particularly in the pediatric and adolescent age groups.

Despite the promising efficacy and safety profile of ADHD medications, significant gaps remain in our understanding of their cognitive effects and long-term outcomes in BD patients. Future research endeavors should prioritize comprehensive cognitive assessments, individual characterization of patients and larger sample sizes to elucidate the potential cognitive benefits of these medications. Also, specific attention should be devoted to develop controlled clinical trials sensitive to emotional dysregulation along different developmental stages, in order to really improve the prognosis of these highly complex patients, that require finely characterized diagnostic processes and highly personalized therapies. Indeed, tailored interventions addressing comorbidities and developmental nuances are imperative to optimize treatment outcomes and enhance the quality of life for individuals with BD and ADHD features.

In conclusion, a multifaceted approach encompassing neurobiological insights, clinical complexity, and treatment implications is essential in navigating at the intersection of ADHD medications and BD. By integrating findings from different clinical perspectives, we can advance personalized care paradigms, tailored to the unique needs of individuals within the BD spectrum. Embracing interdisciplinary collaboration and prioritizing specific research endeavors are crucial steps toward optimizing treatment outcomes and improving the quality of life for this complex patient population.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bipolar Disorders
Bipolar Disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bipolar Disorders is an international journal that publishes all research of relevance for the basic mechanisms, clinical aspects, or treatment of bipolar disorders and related illnesses. It intends to provide a single international outlet for new research in this area and covers research in the following areas: biochemistry physiology neuropsychopharmacology neuroanatomy neuropathology genetics brain imaging epidemiology phenomenology clinical aspects and therapeutics of bipolar disorders Bipolar Disorders also contains papers that form the development of new therapeutic strategies for these disorders as well as papers on the topics of schizoaffective disorders, and depressive disorders as these can be cyclic disorders with areas of overlap with bipolar disorders. The journal will consider for publication submissions within the domain of: Perspectives, Research Articles, Correspondence, Clinical Corner, and Reflections. Within these there are a number of types of articles: invited editorials, debates, review articles, original articles, commentaries, letters to the editors, clinical conundrums, clinical curiosities, clinical care, and musings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信