根据 2022 年世界卫生组织分类和 2022 年国际共识分类,利用开放源数据对骨髓增生异常肿瘤进行重新分类:聚焦 SF3B1 和 TP53 基因突变的骨髓增生异常肿瘤。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Jiwon Yun, Hye Ryoun Kim
{"title":"根据 2022 年世界卫生组织分类和 2022 年国际共识分类,利用开放源数据对骨髓增生异常肿瘤进行重新分类:聚焦 SF3B1 和 TP53 基因突变的骨髓增生异常肿瘤。","authors":"Jiwon Yun, Hye Ryoun Kim","doi":"10.3343/alm.2024.0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2022, the WHO and International Consensus Classification (ICC) published diagnostic criteria for myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDSs). We examined the influence of the revised diagnostic criteria on classifying MDSs in a large population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved an open-source pre-existing dataset from cBioPortal and included 2,454 patients with MDS in this study. Patients were reclassified based on the new diagnostic 2022 WHO and ICC criteria. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression to validate the new criteria and to assess risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the 2022 WHO criteria, 1.4% of patients were reclassified as having AML. The 2022 WHO criteria provide a superior prognostic/diagnostic model to the 2017 WHO criteria (Akaike information criterion, 14,152 vs. 14,516; concordance index, 0.705 vs. 0.681). For classifying MDS with low blast counts and <i>SF3B1</i> mutation, a variant allele frequency cut-off of 5% (2022 WHO criteria) and the absence of <i>RUNX1</i> co-mutation (2022 ICC criteria) are diagnostically relevant. For classifying MDSs with mutated <i>TP53</i>, a blast count cut-off of 10% (2022 ICC criteria) and multi-hit <i>TP53</i> (2022 WHO criteria) are independent risk factors in cases with ≥10% blasts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the refinements of the new WHO criteria. We recommend the complementary use of the new WHO and ICC criteria in classifying <i>SF3B1-</i> and <i>TP53</i>-mutated MDSs for better survival prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8421,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reclassification of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms According to the 2022 World Health Organization Classification and the 2022 International Consensus Classification Using Open-Source Data: Focus on <i>SF3B1-</i> and <i>TP53</i>-mutated Myelodysplastic Neoplasms.\",\"authors\":\"Jiwon Yun, Hye Ryoun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3343/alm.2024.0079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2022, the WHO and International Consensus Classification (ICC) published diagnostic criteria for myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDSs). We examined the influence of the revised diagnostic criteria on classifying MDSs in a large population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved an open-source pre-existing dataset from cBioPortal and included 2,454 patients with MDS in this study. Patients were reclassified based on the new diagnostic 2022 WHO and ICC criteria. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression to validate the new criteria and to assess risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the 2022 WHO criteria, 1.4% of patients were reclassified as having AML. The 2022 WHO criteria provide a superior prognostic/diagnostic model to the 2017 WHO criteria (Akaike information criterion, 14,152 vs. 14,516; concordance index, 0.705 vs. 0.681). For classifying MDS with low blast counts and <i>SF3B1</i> mutation, a variant allele frequency cut-off of 5% (2022 WHO criteria) and the absence of <i>RUNX1</i> co-mutation (2022 ICC criteria) are diagnostically relevant. For classifying MDSs with mutated <i>TP53</i>, a blast count cut-off of 10% (2022 ICC criteria) and multi-hit <i>TP53</i> (2022 WHO criteria) are independent risk factors in cases with ≥10% blasts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the refinements of the new WHO criteria. We recommend the complementary use of the new WHO and ICC criteria in classifying <i>SF3B1-</i> and <i>TP53</i>-mutated MDSs for better survival prediction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0079\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2022年,世界卫生组织和国际共识分类(ICC)发布了骨髓增生异常肿瘤(MDSs)的诊断标准。我们研究了修订后的诊断标准对大量人群中 MDSs 分类的影响:我们从 cBioPortal 获取了一个开源的已有数据集,并将 2,454 名 MDS 患者纳入本研究。根据新的 2022 年 WHO 和 ICC 诊断标准对患者进行了重新分类。采用Cox回归法进行生存分析,以验证新标准并评估风险因素:根据2022年WHO标准,1.4%的患者被重新分类为急性髓细胞白血病。与2017年WHO标准相比,2022年WHO标准提供了更优越的预后/诊断模型(阿凯克信息标准,14152对14516;一致性指数,0.705对0.681)。对于低出血点和SF3B1突变的MDS分类,5%的变异等位基因频率临界值(2022年WHO标准)和无RUNX1共突变(2022年ICC标准)具有诊断意义。在对TP53突变的MDS进行分类时,囊泡计数10%的临界值(2022年ICC标准)和TP53多重突变(2022年WHO标准)是囊泡≥10%病例的独立风险因素:我们的研究结果支持WHO新标准的改进。我们建议在对 SF3B1 和 TP53 基因突变的 MDS 进行分类时互补使用新的 WHO 和 ICC 标准,以便更好地预测生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reclassification of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms According to the 2022 World Health Organization Classification and the 2022 International Consensus Classification Using Open-Source Data: Focus on SF3B1- and TP53-mutated Myelodysplastic Neoplasms.

Background: In 2022, the WHO and International Consensus Classification (ICC) published diagnostic criteria for myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDSs). We examined the influence of the revised diagnostic criteria on classifying MDSs in a large population.

Methods: We retrieved an open-source pre-existing dataset from cBioPortal and included 2,454 patients with MDS in this study. Patients were reclassified based on the new diagnostic 2022 WHO and ICC criteria. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression to validate the new criteria and to assess risk factors.

Results: Based on the 2022 WHO criteria, 1.4% of patients were reclassified as having AML. The 2022 WHO criteria provide a superior prognostic/diagnostic model to the 2017 WHO criteria (Akaike information criterion, 14,152 vs. 14,516; concordance index, 0.705 vs. 0.681). For classifying MDS with low blast counts and SF3B1 mutation, a variant allele frequency cut-off of 5% (2022 WHO criteria) and the absence of RUNX1 co-mutation (2022 ICC criteria) are diagnostically relevant. For classifying MDSs with mutated TP53, a blast count cut-off of 10% (2022 ICC criteria) and multi-hit TP53 (2022 WHO criteria) are independent risk factors in cases with ≥10% blasts.

Conclusions: Our findings support the refinements of the new WHO criteria. We recommend the complementary use of the new WHO and ICC criteria in classifying SF3B1- and TP53-mutated MDSs for better survival prediction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Annals of Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
12.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Laboratory Medicine is the official journal of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The journal title has been recently changed from the Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (ISSN, 1598-6535) from the January issue of 2012. The JCR 2017 Impact factor of Ann Lab Med was 1.916.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信