利用患者反馈预测质量改进措施的效果。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sirou Han, Zhanming Liang
{"title":"利用患者反馈预测质量改进措施的效果。","authors":"Sirou Han,&nbsp;Zhanming Liang","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Internationally, continuous efforts have been put into developing patient complaint channels to understand patients' experience and expectation of care, which can guide the improvement of health service quality. Despite agreement among the value of patient feedback, limited attention has been paid to using patient feedback to predict and promote the actual quality improvement initiatives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To determine whether patient feedback collected from a public feedback hotline can be used to predict the effect of hospital quality service improvement initiatives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis of patient complaint data of a tertiary hospital from 2018 to 2021 was performed. Patient complaints were first coded by the standard classification method of the Australian Hospital Patient Experience Question Set. The characteristics of patients' complaints were then analysed by frequency and contingency table analysis. Finally, through Nonparametric Mann-Kendall test and Joinpoint regression model, the trends of each complaint characteristics were tested.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Amongst the 771 complaints received against clinicians, approximately 75% of them were concerning doctors. ‘Harm and distress’ was the key reason of complaints, followed by ‘not cared for’, ‘lack of confidence’, ‘needs unmet’ and ‘not informed’. In 2021, the number of complaints received in relation to moderate ‘harm and distress’ caused by doctors increased by 667% from 2020. The categories of ‘not informed’, ‘not cared for’ and ‘harm and distress’ were also on the rise with statistical significance. In addition, complaints related to the lack of respect, bad attitude and unprofessional behaviour demonstrated by nurses (<i>n</i> = 83) and doctors (<i>n</i> = 121) were also recorded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patient feedbacks collected via a public feedback hotline provides a useful platform to gain insight into patient experience of care which are valuable to guide quality care improvement. To improve the care quality, clinicians need to participate in quality improvement strategies development at an early stage. Efforts in improving communication and interaction between doctors and patients are needed to improve patients' experience of care and developing patients' trust in both of the clinicians and the medical services. The study highlights the value of using public feedback hotline to generate evidence that can guide hospital service improvement.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpm.3827","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using patient feedback to predict effects of quality improvement initiatives\",\"authors\":\"Sirou Han,&nbsp;Zhanming Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpm.3827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Internationally, continuous efforts have been put into developing patient complaint channels to understand patients' experience and expectation of care, which can guide the improvement of health service quality. Despite agreement among the value of patient feedback, limited attention has been paid to using patient feedback to predict and promote the actual quality improvement initiatives.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine whether patient feedback collected from a public feedback hotline can be used to predict the effect of hospital quality service improvement initiatives.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective analysis of patient complaint data of a tertiary hospital from 2018 to 2021 was performed. Patient complaints were first coded by the standard classification method of the Australian Hospital Patient Experience Question Set. The characteristics of patients' complaints were then analysed by frequency and contingency table analysis. Finally, through Nonparametric Mann-Kendall test and Joinpoint regression model, the trends of each complaint characteristics were tested.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Amongst the 771 complaints received against clinicians, approximately 75% of them were concerning doctors. ‘Harm and distress’ was the key reason of complaints, followed by ‘not cared for’, ‘lack of confidence’, ‘needs unmet’ and ‘not informed’. In 2021, the number of complaints received in relation to moderate ‘harm and distress’ caused by doctors increased by 667% from 2020. The categories of ‘not informed’, ‘not cared for’ and ‘harm and distress’ were also on the rise with statistical significance. In addition, complaints related to the lack of respect, bad attitude and unprofessional behaviour demonstrated by nurses (<i>n</i> = 83) and doctors (<i>n</i> = 121) were also recorded.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patient feedbacks collected via a public feedback hotline provides a useful platform to gain insight into patient experience of care which are valuable to guide quality care improvement. To improve the care quality, clinicians need to participate in quality improvement strategies development at an early stage. Efforts in improving communication and interaction between doctors and patients are needed to improve patients' experience of care and developing patients' trust in both of the clinicians and the medical services. The study highlights the value of using public feedback hotline to generate evidence that can guide hospital service improvement.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpm.3827\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.3827\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.3827","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际上一直在努力开发患者投诉渠道,以了解患者对医疗服务的体验和期望,从而指导医疗服务质量的改善。尽管人们对患者反馈的价值达成了共识,但对利用患者反馈来预测和促进实际质量改进措施的关注却很有限:目的:确定从公众反馈热线收集到的患者反馈是否可用于预测医院优质服务改进措施的效果:对某三甲医院 2018 年至 2021 年的患者投诉数据进行回顾性分析。首先根据澳大利亚医院患者体验问题集的标准分类方法对患者投诉进行编码。然后通过频数分析和或然率表分析患者投诉的特征。最后,通过非参数 Mann-Kendall 检验和 Joinpoint 回归模型,检验了各投诉特征的变化趋势:在收到的 771 份针对临床医生的投诉中,约 75% 涉及医生。伤害和痛苦 "是投诉的主要原因,其次是 "未得到照顾"、"缺乏信心"、"需求未得到满足 "和 "未被告知"。与 2020 年相比,2021 年收到的与医生造成的中度 "伤害和痛苦 "有关的投诉增加了 667%。未被告知"、"未被照顾 "和 "伤害和痛苦 "等类别的投诉量也呈上升趋势,且具有统计学意义。此外,还记录了有关护士(83 人)和医生(121 人)缺乏尊重、态度恶劣和不专业行为的投诉:通过公众反馈热线收集的病人反馈意见为深入了解病人的护理体验提供了一个有用的平台,对改善护理质量具有重要的指导意义。为提高护理质量,临床医生需要尽早参与质量改进策略的制定。需要努力改善医生与患者之间的沟通和互动,以改善患者的护理体验,增强患者对临床医生和医疗服务的信任。这项研究强调了利用公众反馈热线生成证据以指导医院改善服务的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using patient feedback to predict effects of quality improvement initiatives

Using patient feedback to predict effects of quality improvement initiatives

Background

Internationally, continuous efforts have been put into developing patient complaint channels to understand patients' experience and expectation of care, which can guide the improvement of health service quality. Despite agreement among the value of patient feedback, limited attention has been paid to using patient feedback to predict and promote the actual quality improvement initiatives.

Objective

To determine whether patient feedback collected from a public feedback hotline can be used to predict the effect of hospital quality service improvement initiatives.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patient complaint data of a tertiary hospital from 2018 to 2021 was performed. Patient complaints were first coded by the standard classification method of the Australian Hospital Patient Experience Question Set. The characteristics of patients' complaints were then analysed by frequency and contingency table analysis. Finally, through Nonparametric Mann-Kendall test and Joinpoint regression model, the trends of each complaint characteristics were tested.

Results

Amongst the 771 complaints received against clinicians, approximately 75% of them were concerning doctors. ‘Harm and distress’ was the key reason of complaints, followed by ‘not cared for’, ‘lack of confidence’, ‘needs unmet’ and ‘not informed’. In 2021, the number of complaints received in relation to moderate ‘harm and distress’ caused by doctors increased by 667% from 2020. The categories of ‘not informed’, ‘not cared for’ and ‘harm and distress’ were also on the rise with statistical significance. In addition, complaints related to the lack of respect, bad attitude and unprofessional behaviour demonstrated by nurses (n = 83) and doctors (n = 121) were also recorded.

Conclusion

Patient feedbacks collected via a public feedback hotline provides a useful platform to gain insight into patient experience of care which are valuable to guide quality care improvement. To improve the care quality, clinicians need to participate in quality improvement strategies development at an early stage. Efforts in improving communication and interaction between doctors and patients are needed to improve patients' experience of care and developing patients' trust in both of the clinicians and the medical services. The study highlights the value of using public feedback hotline to generate evidence that can guide hospital service improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信