植入式帽状张力环对术后屈光偏移的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Su Xu, Yuhang Zhang, Xintong Li, Wei Si, Gengqi Tian, Yifan Yang, Yizhuo Hu, Fengyan Zhang
{"title":"植入式帽状张力环对术后屈光偏移的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Su Xu, Yuhang Zhang, Xintong Li, Wei Si, Gengqi Tian, Yifan Yang, Yizhuo Hu, Fengyan Zhang","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2024.2381770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The capsular tension ring is a novel assistant tool for cataract surgery; however, controversy exists in its co-implantation. The potential for hyperopic or myopic shift resulting from the co-implantation of the capsular tension ring and intraocular lens remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the postoperative refractive prediction error and the direction of refractive shift in cataract patients who underwent capsular tension ring co-implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis,searching electronic databases for studies of individuals diagnosed with cataracts receiving surgery with or without capsular tension ring implantation. Systematic searches were performed based on five databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The primary outcome was the mean arithmetic refractive prediction error. Secondary outcomes were mean absolute refractive prediction error and the number of eyes within a certain refractive prediction error range. We applied a fixed-effectsmodel to pool effect sizes across trials using weighted mean differences (WMD) and risk ratios (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Statistical heterogeneity scores were assessed with the I<sup>2</sup>statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 407 affected eyes were included in eight independent clinical studies. Meta-analysis suggested significant differences both in short-term (≤1 month) co-implantation (WMD = 0.16, <i>p</i> < .001, 95% CI: -0.13 ~ 0.19) and long-term (≥3 months) co-implantation between the capsular tension ring co-implantation group and the control group (WMD = 0.19, <i>p</i> < .001, 95% CI: 0.15 ~ 0.23). However, no significant difference was observed in the high myopia subgroup whether capsular tension ring co-implantation (WMD = 0.03, <i>p</i> = .083, 95% CI: -0.27 ~ 0.34). Heterogeneity was not found among the studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to simple intraocular lens implantation, capsular tension ring co-implantation is more susceptible to developing hyperopic shifts in non-myopic cataract patients, probably related to anterior chamber depth. It requires careful consideration by clinicians when determining the target diopter preoperatively. However, interpretation is limited, because there is a lack of studies available for analysis. There still needs to be additional studies to expand the evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Implanted Capsular Tension Ring on Postoperative Refractive Shift: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Su Xu, Yuhang Zhang, Xintong Li, Wei Si, Gengqi Tian, Yifan Yang, Yizhuo Hu, Fengyan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08820538.2024.2381770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The capsular tension ring is a novel assistant tool for cataract surgery; however, controversy exists in its co-implantation. The potential for hyperopic or myopic shift resulting from the co-implantation of the capsular tension ring and intraocular lens remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the postoperative refractive prediction error and the direction of refractive shift in cataract patients who underwent capsular tension ring co-implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis,searching electronic databases for studies of individuals diagnosed with cataracts receiving surgery with or without capsular tension ring implantation. Systematic searches were performed based on five databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The primary outcome was the mean arithmetic refractive prediction error. Secondary outcomes were mean absolute refractive prediction error and the number of eyes within a certain refractive prediction error range. We applied a fixed-effectsmodel to pool effect sizes across trials using weighted mean differences (WMD) and risk ratios (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Statistical heterogeneity scores were assessed with the I<sup>2</sup>statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 407 affected eyes were included in eight independent clinical studies. Meta-analysis suggested significant differences both in short-term (≤1 month) co-implantation (WMD = 0.16, <i>p</i> < .001, 95% CI: -0.13 ~ 0.19) and long-term (≥3 months) co-implantation between the capsular tension ring co-implantation group and the control group (WMD = 0.19, <i>p</i> < .001, 95% CI: 0.15 ~ 0.23). However, no significant difference was observed in the high myopia subgroup whether capsular tension ring co-implantation (WMD = 0.03, <i>p</i> = .083, 95% CI: -0.27 ~ 0.34). Heterogeneity was not found among the studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to simple intraocular lens implantation, capsular tension ring co-implantation is more susceptible to developing hyperopic shifts in non-myopic cataract patients, probably related to anterior chamber depth. It requires careful consideration by clinicians when determining the target diopter preoperatively. However, interpretation is limited, because there is a lack of studies available for analysis. There still needs to be additional studies to expand the evidence base.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2381770\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2381770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:囊袋拉力环是白内障手术的一种新型辅助工具,但在联合植入方面存在争议。同时植入囊袋拉力环和眼内透镜可能导致的远视或近视偏移仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定接受囊袋拉力环联合植入术的白内障患者术后屈光预测误差和屈光偏移的方向:我们进行了一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,在电子数据库中搜索了关于白内障患者接受囊袋拉力环植入手术或未接受囊袋拉力环植入手术的研究。系统性检索基于五个数据库:PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Medline 和中国国家知识基础设施。主要结果是平均算术屈光预测误差。次要结果为平均绝对屈光预测误差和屈光预测误差在一定范围内的眼数。我们采用固定效应模型,使用加权平均差(WMD)和风险比(RR)及其 95% 置信区间(95% CI)来汇总各试验的效应大小。用 I2 统计量评估统计异质性得分:八项独立的临床研究共纳入了 407 只受影响的眼睛。Meta 分析表明,短期(≤1 个月)共同植入均存在显著差异(WMD = 0.16,p p = .083,95% CI:-0.27 ~ 0.34)。各研究之间未发现异质性:结论:与单纯的眼内晶状体植入术相比,囊袋拉力环联合植入术更容易使非近视白内障患者发生远视偏移,这可能与前房深度有关。临床医生在术前确定目标屈光度时需要慎重考虑。然而,由于缺乏可用于分析的研究,对该问题的解释还很有限。还需要更多的研究来扩大证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Implanted Capsular Tension Ring on Postoperative Refractive Shift: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The capsular tension ring is a novel assistant tool for cataract surgery; however, controversy exists in its co-implantation. The potential for hyperopic or myopic shift resulting from the co-implantation of the capsular tension ring and intraocular lens remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the postoperative refractive prediction error and the direction of refractive shift in cataract patients who underwent capsular tension ring co-implantation.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis,searching electronic databases for studies of individuals diagnosed with cataracts receiving surgery with or without capsular tension ring implantation. Systematic searches were performed based on five databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The primary outcome was the mean arithmetic refractive prediction error. Secondary outcomes were mean absolute refractive prediction error and the number of eyes within a certain refractive prediction error range. We applied a fixed-effectsmodel to pool effect sizes across trials using weighted mean differences (WMD) and risk ratios (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Statistical heterogeneity scores were assessed with the I2statistic.

Results: A total of 407 affected eyes were included in eight independent clinical studies. Meta-analysis suggested significant differences both in short-term (≤1 month) co-implantation (WMD = 0.16, p < .001, 95% CI: -0.13 ~ 0.19) and long-term (≥3 months) co-implantation between the capsular tension ring co-implantation group and the control group (WMD = 0.19, p < .001, 95% CI: 0.15 ~ 0.23). However, no significant difference was observed in the high myopia subgroup whether capsular tension ring co-implantation (WMD = 0.03, p = .083, 95% CI: -0.27 ~ 0.34). Heterogeneity was not found among the studies.

Conclusion: Compared to simple intraocular lens implantation, capsular tension ring co-implantation is more susceptible to developing hyperopic shifts in non-myopic cataract patients, probably related to anterior chamber depth. It requires careful consideration by clinicians when determining the target diopter preoperatively. However, interpretation is limited, because there is a lack of studies available for analysis. There still needs to be additional studies to expand the evidence base.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Seminars in Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信